Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 2. (Read 24859 times)
I am fully convinced that bounty hunters cannot in any way affect the prices of coins. Indeed, in total, they receive literally a few percent of the total budget. I believe that the problem really lies in other circumstances. First of all, you need to take into account the general decline in the market and manipulation.
bounty hunters owned only small amount tokens . investors and whales are the real one to blame here because they are manipulating the price .
The thing is they should anticipate the dump as this is usual and they should have a good plan to reverse the dump, like having a sell support that controlling the sell order not lower than the ico price. That way it can protect its investors, but really you will barely to see this kind of team nowadays.
We really need a good forum software, we are still stuck at 10 year old forum software with no update..
Lol! No one is forcing you to stay here. Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
It's always a blame game for shitty projects out there. If the project has a really good potential then buyers will save the price because I have seen some projects that manage to go 10x after listing even they held a high paying bounty.
Atlanta bounty was a disaster for me..
first they distributed bounty in 18 months period
than after few months, they start asking for KYC and 1 ETH amount to continue receiving bounty.
Bounty Manager should stop asking for KYC.. as this is not required for such small amount bounties
first they distributed bounty in 18 months period
than after few months, they start asking for KYC and 1 ETH amount to continue receiving bounty.
Bounty Manager should stop asking for KYC.. as this is not required for such small amount bounties
Bounty hunters are guilty because they almost instantly sell all of their rewards once it comes to exchange. But I want to tell bounty hunter guilty for promoting a scam campaign. When they promote scam project and investors lose their money, I would say bounty hunters are responsible for this.
Exactly, every bounty hunter will think in positive direction and start promoting the bounty campaign with lot of hopes on their mind. So nobody wants to promote the scam bounty but due to cruel team makes them to scam the investors and bounty hunters after the crowdsale.
We really need a good forum software, we are still stuck at 10 year old forum software with no update..
Bounty hunters are guilty because they almost instantly sell all of their rewards once it comes to exchange. But I want to tell bounty hunter guilty for promoting a scam campaign. When they promote scam project and investors lose their money, I would say bounty hunters are responsible for this.
Exactly, every bounty hunter will think in positive direction and start promoting the bounty campaign with lot of hopes on their mind. So nobody wants to promote the scam bounty but due to cruel team makes them to scam the investors and bounty hunters after the crowdsale.
I think not all bounty hunters make the price of tokens a dump. Moreover, now the payment for bounty hunters is slowed down to maintain price stability.
If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token / coin.
Actually it is a risk that devs/teams must face when he run a project. They must understand something that is always done by bounty hunters when they get tokens from their projects.If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token / coin.
And I think, it's a natural thing that must be understood by teams, because when bounty hunter got the token then it has being a right bounty hunter. They have a exempt to decide to sell or keep hold of the tokens they get.
Bounty hunters are guilty because they almost instantly sell all of their rewards once it comes to exchange.
yes as a bounty hunter i do this all the time and im not guilty . why should i be guilty if i have work hard to earn that tokens ? i did not steal them and those are not came from scamming or from scam projects .
But I want to tell bounty hunter guilty for promoting a scam campaign. When they promote scam project and investors lose their money, I would say bounty hunters are responsible for this.
yes they must be guilty only if they know that the bounty is a scam but if not then its not thier fault but its the fault by the owner or the bounty manager .
bounty hunters owned only small amount tokens . investors and whales are the real one to blame here because they are manipulating the price .
Bounty hunters are guilty because they almost instantly sell all of their rewards once it comes to exchange. But I want to tell bounty hunter guilty for promoting a scam campaign. When they promote scam project and investors lose their money, I would say bounty hunters are responsible for this.
This is not someone problem, this is not happen by any Hunter or project team. If you check Crowdmachine project, there didn't offered bounty token but price is huge dump.
in any case, if we take into account that the total gender for the bounty company is only 1 and 3% of the total amount of a coin, it is very funny to believe that 3% of the tokens that go on sale on the market significantly affect its pricing. 
No, according to my opinion, the bounty share is quite small, they haven't paid at all lately. It's impossible to influence the price drop with so much share
I think not all bounty hunters make the price of tokens a dump. Moreover, now the payment for bounty hunters is slowed down to maintain price stability.
If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token/coin.
If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token/coin.
Yes, you are right companies are allocating very low funds to bounty hunters and finally people are completely blaming the bounty hunters. I hope the price will not affect with the bounty allocation, even most of the people will not dump the coins.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I don't know in what way that bounty hunters became guilty anyway? You need to tell us here the complete details dude. due to I'm not type of a community here that will get easily believe in the hearsay. Actually, in my assessment about in bounty hunters all of them has a big role in every campaign, without them I do believed that the ico project won't succeed for sure.
I think not all bounty hunters make the price of tokens a dump. Moreover, now the payment for bounty hunters is slowed down to maintain price stability.
If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token / coin.
If analyzed this is not true. The ICO project only provides funds of around 1% of the total tokens. And this clearly will not affect the market price of a token / coin.
This is nonsense that the price goes down because of bounty hunters. If you look at what rewards are given to advisers, then our rewards will be a drop in the ocean.The price always falls due to the wrong marketing project. And this is the main reason.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I believe that such accusations against them are a huge mistake. In fact, many projects do not develop and do not rise in price due to the current problems in the crypto market and strong manipulations by various speculators. Investors need to remember that bounty hunters account for only a few percent of the total budget.
It's very convenient to blame bounty hunters for everyone, but the percentage that projects on a payback is insignificant and can only affect the price cut shortly. I do not sell good projects, and even buy additional, that is, I invest. For me, these allegations are simply nonsense.
The title is very confusing, why should the bounty hunters become guilty, they have the right on the token because it is allocated for promoting and exposing the project to all investors and bounty hunters are investors too, some of them are investing their money too, so bounty hunters should not be guilty at all.
If all the projects had set themselves the task of buying back their tokens from the bounty participants, this would probably have a very good effect on the price of the token after it hits the stock exchange, but few do. And I do not know what could be the reason. Maybe it really is very few people really need.
Jump to: