Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 10. (Read 24859 times)
I don't think anyone has blamed the bounty hunters, I think it's something investors usually dump a coin on as soon as it comes out on the exchange, if that's what you mean, like you say, if the project is good, they're going up, because revolutionary technologies always gain a lot of momentum and end up being very productive economically.
Depends on the type, but I can agree.
If its social media campaigns, then I would say yes, they made it into spam.
No added value, just likes/shares/retweets/etc. or comments with broken english. This gives crypto a bad name.
I have done translations on the whitepaper. That seems like the most noble out of all, however, signature usually pays better.
If its social media campaigns, then I would say yes, they made it into spam.
No added value, just likes/shares/retweets/etc. or comments with broken english. This gives crypto a bad name.
I have done translations on the whitepaper. That seems like the most noble out of all, however, signature usually pays better.
I do not know why some people are accusing bounty hunters. I think the hunters make the project successful and only help with a small reward. Usually hunters get coins after they get investors and the project goes to the stock exchange.
Actually, most bounty hunters I have seen usually sell off their tokens when they receive their tokens and this causes massive drop in price of a project and an investor would be on deficit on his invested capital. In my opinion, its not only bounty hunters that are guilty. Also, private sale investors also sell off because they usually receive massive discounts and this makes them be in huge profit when tokens are listed.
Don't know how they are guilty. Bounty hunters are the persons who played the greatest role in spreading about a coin a social media. So, they are doing their little job and getting paid.
Airdrop coins crypto people cannot lower price a long as most people remain scouting for snatching a good amount tokens at then cryptoexchanges. Levels reductions could remain based due to poor marketing for several starting seasons.
I sincerely do not agree with this. How are bounty hunters at fault? The bounty hunters are in my own opinion even helping giving the projects and ICOs more publicity so that more investors can be aware of a particular project. If a project or ICO has got a good use case, it will speak for itself and no investor will ever blame him or herself for investing in such ICO.
A bit annoying the attitude of some bounty managers to the hunter. It's like the hunters are beggars. We don't beg for anything, but we earn honestly, observing the conditions established in the campaign rules. Fortunately, the majority of managers, adequate, and inadequate , usually don't store a lot of campaigns because to him no one comes. 
The blame are always pure on hunter, it is not always true that price got dumped by disparate hunters sometime dashing out too much bonus during ico usually cause dump of price and not hunters.
Come to think of it, percentage allocated to bounty reward are little compared to what investors have control over. I am not totally disproving the fact that bounty hunters dump coin but the blame also fall on investors whose bonuses are more than bounty rewards and can also dump since bonuses are not paid for.
I don't get when you say guilty.. Bounty hunters have nothing to do with price of coins or tokens they are dumping. It's all up to the investors wether they would stick with the tokes or not.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Bounty hunters are not guilty and should not be blamed for everything that happens. Even many investors dump their tokens immediately they receive them, why is it only bounty hunters that will suffer for the blame of others.
yes that is true because most time wen they invest in any ICO, they will all thing the project will moon but in no time wen the token is being disbursed the bounty hunter will go dump it and the price will what no value and it decrease to what they even invest in the initials so that is it's obvious said that they are guilty.
All things considered, Im totally new so Im very befuddled. Nonetheless, I don't concur with that. I have seen a pattern with a few financial specialists who choose to drop the cost keeping in mind the end goal to offer early and move over to another venture.
Bounty hunters are guilty of criminal offense. They earn money by making an Ico ad that they trust. They spend a lot of time and spend their time here.
I think abundance seekers are not to fault, since they are strolling on track, there is definitely no impact or capacity to bring down loan costs particularly that makes token dispersion or coins be hindered, I think the change is because of a framework change that can not be as simple as ruled by abundance seekers, they simply pause and expectation as indicated by the guaranteed part in blessing giving, I think abundance seekers is a section that can help in the achievement of a promoting and deals venture. unique in relation to the investors.n the abundance seekers enthusiastically sit tight calmly for the dispersion of tokens and coins from the organization even they are numerous who until not get paid in light of the fact that the objective isn't an objective.
It is not possible for the bounty hunter that they are the main reason why the coin/tokens rate is low. When you see in the ico percentage, the bounty rewards got the lowest allocation. The whales that are getting good discount in the ico sale is the main reason. They only make the ico as their business, they just buy in lowest rate and sell it hard.
Of course, most bounty hunters sell their coins and prices fall. But it's their decision. They were wasting their time
I think personally if the prize hunters are not problematic unless they scam the project. I see it as a way to promote and support your favorite projects. but if it is used for people who do bad things or commit unlawful acts, but as long as we have a balanced balance between the crypto business and the workers, we do not need to use words of accusation like guilty.
I think the change is because of a framework change that can not be as simple as commanded by abundance seekers, they simply pause and expectation as per the guaranteed part in blessing giving, I think abundance seekers is a section that can help in the achievement of a promoting and deals venture not the same as the investors. In the abundance seekers eagerly sit tight persistently for the conveyance of tokens and coins from the organization even they are numerous who until not get paid in light of the fact that the objective isn't an objective.
Jump to: