Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 8. (Read 24859 times)
Indeed today many blame the bounty hunter for causing the price of the ICO project token to fall far from the opening price. Although not everything is true, but it has made investors accuse it of all. So before we make an investment we must always be prepared with all the risks and not just blame the bounty hunter. Because indeed almost all cryptocurrency prices are experiencing a decline to date. Bitcoin alone takes a long time to get to the current price, so you have to be patient to be able to benefit from cryptocurrency.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
You know, the bounty hunter's share is only a small part of the total token, usually 2%-3%, and the team usually holds 10%-30% of the share, and the share sold to investors is usually It accounts for more than 50%, so if you look at this ratio, you know that the dumping of the bounty hunter is impossible to affect the token market price. In my opinion, it is clear that some project side shirk their responsibilities and shifting the responsibility of the token price drop to the bounty hunter. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
No, they paid token for bounty hunter to marketing their projects. And price drop when bounty hunter flip their token. But if token have good potential, price will up again and make a profit for investors.
Bounty hunters are not guilty in any way. I think bounty has been a way for ICOs to make cheap but effective promotion of their platforms and considering that bounty budgets are always between 1-3% of the total hardcap of projects, Even when bounty hunters sell off for less a good project should be able to withstand it.
I think projects that choose to give a large pool you their bounty hunters should choose to pay in ETH
I think projects that choose to give a large pool you their bounty hunters should choose to pay in ETH
I truly don't concur with this. How are abundance seekers to blame? The abundance seekers are as I would see it notwithstanding helping giving the tasks and ICOs greater attention with the goal that more financial specialists can know about a specific undertaking. In the event that a task or ICO has a decent utilize case, it will justify itself with real evidence and no speculator will ever reprimand him or herself for putting resources into such ICO.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
They usually say that bounty hunters are the once who dumps the value of the coin/token but I don't think it's their fault because that issue of dumping the price of a token must have been taken into consideration by the team of the project. They knew that it might happen or it is actually happening for real and they should've prepared action or solution to prevent dumping. Like this one token where I've read that they have allocated certain fund to buy back those token from bounty hunters because they knew very well that once the bounty reward has been distributed then bounty hunters will sell at once. Bounty reward allocation is just a small percentage from total coin supply so it's not that huge if they would rebuy those tokens from bounty hunters. Just my personal opinion.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Bounty hunters have an impact on altcoin price drppings because many of them sell after ico at a low price. But for those who wait, the rewards are greater.
bounty hunters can never be guilty, any body stipulating so is so dishonest and untruthful, bounty hunters make ICOs so popular, if not for them, the so called investors wouldn't have even known about the project to start with
Rewards supporters would not knock gains when everyone are pursuing obtaining a greater amount of cryptos on the crypto-markets. Gains drops may be facilitated on account of unstable apetite no less than quite too many introductory periods.
Bounty hunters are guilty? Why? Some people think that we are spamming all around the forum, and they want to read qualified posts, etc. But there are lots of interesting posts, lots of information which is gathered by bounty hunters and spread all over the forum. No doubts, lots of posts made by bounty hunters are not very useful, but they are very helpful for the projects. Otherwise, they wouldn't spend money and time on bounty campaigns.
We cannot put the blame on bounty hunters 100% but they also form part of the downturn in the market by dumping their tokens early.
the part of tokens sold by bounty hunters can't dump the market because of small amounts. but tokens sold by developers themselves can dump the coin till zero.
People blamde bounty hunters because they generally dump their coins right after getting them, after all, that means that they are devaluating their previous holdings making it drop in price.
We cannot put the blame on bounty hunters 100% but they also form part of the downturn in the market by dumping their tokens early.
Investors got rekt a bit and start blaming everyone including bounty hunters that have done nothing (perhaps, they blame them in those dumps after tokens distributed)
Abundance seekers can't influence the value drop, as they have a little piece of the tokens and not all abundance seekers in the meantime deplete. The cost depends just on the administrators of the venture. In the event that you don't see the advancement of the venture, at that point what's the point to keep the coins even to speculators . The cost may rise instantly if before posting a decent article or news is documented.
Unarguably, bounty hunters are guilty. In a situation whereby bounty hunters get nothing less than 20k+ token from a particular bounty maybe from article writing and BTT and some other one's. They tends to dump all this token in the market immediately it get listed on an exchanger thereby lowering the prize if not to the ground. But if we see a change of attitude of bounty hunters just like ICO's investors, I think some project whould have been great and will be doing good in the market.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
It varies a lot from bounty programs to bounty programs.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43128217
Check out the link above to find out more bounty programs.
It is not true.
Maximum share of bounty hunters it is around 1% from the project's total supply. I don't think that 1% of holders are able to influence on the market price so crtically. It can happen only if project have problems with the trading volume and liquidity.
Maximum share of bounty hunters it is around 1% from the project's total supply. I don't think that 1% of holders are able to influence on the market price so crtically. It can happen only if project have problems with the trading volume and liquidity.
Actually not the majority of ICO can provide success for investors because the problems are often faced and as investors keep trying when at the end ico has not provided maximum benefits in order to help their economy tend to be helped.
Bounty hunters helps the ICO's to promote their project, even we can get small percentage amount. So why the bounty hunter to get guilty.
Jump to: