That's not the true reality, don't listen to anyone saying that bounty hunters are guilty because there's hundreds of hunters who will hold their coins if they think that the project is worth it. In most, the hunters would dump and sell because they came just to earn which is the bad side in the whole story.
We shall let peoples act freely, that what we call freedom.Hunters earned their rewards legally, they are absolutely right and they are free.
Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 5. (Read 24934 times)
Hunters should not take these comments personal. Someone always has to be blamed for failure. I saw many coins were dumped
while the hunters still not getting rewarded. Bounty allocations are ususaaly 1% of total supply so they cannot have a big influence on the coin long term. I am not saying hunters are not dumping, but it cannot have long term effect .
while the hunters still not getting rewarded. Bounty allocations are ususaaly 1% of total supply so they cannot have a big influence on the coin long term. I am not saying hunters are not dumping, but it cannot have long term effect .
Bounty Hunter types of blood sell them cheap on the market value and of course, this makes the coins from the ICO to be quite low and even falling from the ICO expected value. many of the investors who have complained of since ICO wish not far from expected. might as well not completely wrong from a bounty hunter because it is the absolute of the results paid for the job is done bounty hunter.
Because bounty hunters did not invest in the project and it is profitable for them to sell tokens even at a price that was at the ICO or even lower. And investors are waiting for the price to rise, to earn something.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I fully agree with this statement. It will now be wrong to blame bounty hunters for problems. After all, you need to understand - only 1-3% of all tokens stand out for their share. It is unlikely that the sale of such a number of tokens can critically affect the value of the coins.
I agree that it is foolish to blame for the low price of coins bounty hunters. After the end of the ICO and the release of the coin on the exchange, as a rule, the price decreases for some time. But if the project has a good idea and a team, you will soon see a high trading volume and the price of the coin go to the moon.
Bounty hunters are not to be blamed for anything, if a project is good ebouugh, there will always be liquidity and price will always go up. What percentage does bounty hunters get from sold tokens is insignificant. The current market is another factor and not bounty hunters.
Now many ICO projects regulate coin distribution. Some of my ICO projects followed them to send coins through stages. So for Bounty participants, this is usually the last to receive coins and it also goes through a long process. This is done so that there is no significant price reduction.
Bounty Hunter rated much selling coins with large numbers and this makes the price go down. but this system is certainly a freedom to bounty hunter because this is the result of work done. Perhaps many investors who feel that this is the cause of the fall in price but actually that's not entirely true.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I think that totally not right, cause not all bounty participant selling their coins directly after it got listed in the market.Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Some of them keeping their coins as a way of investment just like a regular investors who purchase their coins.
Correct. I hate to break it but some hunters also rely on those campaign and its hurting to know that investors are quite angry when the hunters got paid and blaming them for dump price.
If they think about it, some hunters are also investors minded and they want to earn big. Not only them, but for the case of dumpers, they deserved it since they work for it.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I think that totally not right, cause not all bounty participant selling their coins directly after it got listed in the market.Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Some of them keeping their coins as a way of investment just like a regular investors who purchase their coins.
In my opinion, bounty hunters cannot significantly affect the price of tokens. In the couple of years that I have been watching the market, there were many examples when the project tokens were 100 times more expensive than the cost of the ICO. And look for the causes of failure in someone is the lot of the weak.
There are many factors causing the decline in value in the ICO project. But, I quite believe the statement that "bounty hunter is guilty" whether you got the statement from where. But I agree a little.
I am a bounty hunter in the article/blog. You know right? Usually, there are several managers showing bounty hunter writings in a spreadsheet. and ...... OMG, I read their writings, most of them are not content-quality and either have a significant contribution or not to the project they are reviewing. I feel like those don't. And sadly, a lot of their writing was accepted. I regret that. Indeed there are those who write well and professionally, but there are very few in number.
So, I feel that bounty hunters also have a share in reducing crypto values.
I believe the quote which says that "if we give a job to those who do not have expertise, then wait for destruction".
I am a bounty hunter in the article/blog. You know right? Usually, there are several managers showing bounty hunter writings in a spreadsheet. and ...... OMG, I read their writings, most of them are not content-quality and either have a significant contribution or not to the project they are reviewing. I feel like those don't. And sadly, a lot of their writing was accepted. I regret that. Indeed there are those who write well and professionally, but there are very few in number.
So, I feel that bounty hunters also have a share in reducing crypto values.
I believe the quote which says that "if we give a job to those who do not have expertise, then wait for destruction".
The developer are the one guilty here as they have no option than using bounty hunter to promote their project but thinking they are superior over hunters in other not to reward them on their work in bad thing that need to be correct and every hunters need to fight this , I hate seeing the clause saying they have right to take or change the rules not considering the fact that hunter also have their say but in this situation , hunters are count as fool and it is a bad image that need to be fight.
If what you said was the situation then the developer are not the one to be blame but the whole team in charge with the bounty managers and this is why I usually advice people to join a bounty project which the team are well experience because they will always put their worker feelings into consideration.
It is not the fault of the bounty hunters that the prices are falling after the first exchange listing. It is very easy to blame hunters for that but it is the fault of the team members that they were not able to create enough hype around the project to make people buy their tokens.
This is the wrong view, ICO project development teams usually like bounty hunters. What is really sinful is not the bounty hunter, but the ICO scam team. These talents are truly sinful and they persecute the cryptocurrency market.
Certainly not just the bounty hunters are the main reason for the altcoin's price to go below. There are many things to consider like the usual investors that are dumping the tokens for profit raise. And also the team has a allocation also on the project ico.
The developer are the one guilty here as they have no option than using bounty hunter to promote their project but thinking they are superior over hunters in other not to reward them on their work in bad thing that need to be correct and every hunters need to fight this , I hate seeing the clause saying they have right to take or change the rules not considering the fact that hunter also have their say but in this situation , hunters are count as fool and it is a bad image that need to be fight.
There is nothing to be guilty about for bounty hunters it all depends on the project if its a good one then there are sure to be good rewards and benefits but if not then there is nothing bounty hunters can do about
Bounty teams reacts accordingly on the behaviors of bounty hunters. If there are fraudulent attempts, then expect a hard response to counter such attempts. If I am a bounty manager, it would not be easy for me to handle hundreds or even thousands of applications and I would also be frustrated if I find out that a lot of these entries are frauds.
Jump to: