Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 11. (Read 24859 times)
It's just a suggestion only. bounty hunter only received small appropriations from the whole crypto. so if it makes price falls then simply make a question. down and rise in the price depends on whether the team could make it to be developed after ICO or not.
this is all untrue, bounty members have a minimum percentage of tokens and it does not affect the course in any way
Bounty hunters are not to blame for the fact that large investors immediately sell their tokens below the ICO price. If ICO projects remove 40% discount for initial investors, then we will see much more successful projects.
You are wrong. Nobody owes anyone. This is the law of life. The coin on the market is falling, but you just have to wait and it will start to grow. This is a long process.
The fact is that the low price of a token is justified by the presence of bounties. And the real reason is the uselessness of the project. Successful development of any platform will always have a good price. That's all.
Suppose a coin raised 10mn dollars and out of that, 1mn was allocated to bounty hunters. Now the day the coin gets listed on any exchange, those bounty hunters will immediately sell those coins and hence causing a dump. By doing that, the price of the token would fall and investors would feel the heat and might panic. Hence, it is observed that every time a coin is listed on any exchange, the price takes a big hit and takes a while to recover.
I agree with you, most of the participants or the bounty hunters always dump their coin if the allocation f a certain program is low, they have no patience in holding their funds,Patience is the key to gain profit in this field.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I think that always when they say something like this - Do not take this seriously. Bounty contract has never had so many tokens to seriously affect the course. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
It is a fair game. Developers pay tokens to bounty hunters for work.
Bounty hunters just help projects to index in search engines and get more viral
Bounty hunters just help projects to index in search engines and get more viral
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why blaming each other instead of driving in one vehicle and ride in one direction for the common good of crypto. Yes it's true that some hunters dispose of their tokens immediately after receiving it, but I know that there are only a few doing that, mostly if a certain project has a good team with a reliable concept, hunters have a vision that after the reward had received, it better to hold than to dumb because they believed a good project comes with a good value. Both hunters and project team must exert all their best to prove that it is worth to invest in this project. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Suppose a coin raised 10mn dollars and out of that, 1mn was allocated to bounty hunters. Now the day the coin gets listed on any exchange, those bounty hunters will immediately sell those coins and hence causing a dump. By doing that, the price of the token would fall and investors would feel the heat and might panic. Hence, it is observed that every time a coin is listed on any exchange, the price takes a big hit and takes a while to recover.
thinking the same as me, the average bounty participant receives only 1%. but there is always news of bounty participants just ruin the market price, really unfair to me. should the project team be able to control prices in the market with attractive programs.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
bounty hunters are not guilty for that matter. the thing is, many bounty hunters are selling immediately after it enters the market, but it doesnt mean that the coin will become trash or a shitcoin after that, there are some developments that the project itself must done, so their coin will increase its value. if there is no development from the developers, then that is when the investors money will put to waste. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Bounty hunters can't affect the price drop, as they have a very small part of the tokens and not all bounty hunters at the same time drain. The price depends only on the admins of the project. If you do not see the development of the project, then what's the point to keep the coins even to investors . The price may rise immediately if before listing a very good article or news is filed.
Who said bounty hunters are guilty? I do not think this is right. Bounty Hunters make their project more known, thus attracting more investors. And the number of coins they hold is nothing compared to the investors.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I don't agree on this, as we bounty hunters had just small amount of shares from the total token being distributed and to think that not all bounty hunters will dumps during first or second month from listing at exchanges. If the project have product and strong team support then this is not the issue. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
maybe it's because the bounty hunters are trying to sell their tokens rewards as soon as possible when the tokens release in the market and this makes the price is getting dump so hard. I think this is not the bounty hunters mistake, they only selling the rewards to get ethereum so they can sell their ethereum to make money. I think if the tokens are really good enough to get survive in the market, then the tokens will stay in the actual price and will increase by slowly or fast.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I don't agree on this, as we bounty hunters had just small amount of shares from the total token being distributed and to think that not all bounty hunters will dumps during first or second month from listing at exchanges. If the project have product and strong team support then this is not the issue. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Some hunters begin to sell their earned tokens after entering the exchange, but the percentage of such people is small. If a project with a good idea and a team that can realize all the ideas, hunters are not a problem for the price of the token.
I do not agree with that. I have noticed a trend with some investors. There are investors, who because of the bonus gotten from their investments in coins or tokens decide to drop the price in order to sell early and move over to another investment.
Investors get their coins of bounty hunters. and investors get from 40 to 80% of the total pool of released tokens, and bounty hunters - 1-2% of the sold. R the above points not a proof of the fact that bounty hunters can`t affect the exchange rate of the coin?
Many people like to shirk these responsibilities to the people around them. Many bounty hunters are rewarding tasks to earn living expenses. Without these bounty hunter promotion projects, how do these projects attract customers? If no one invests in these tokens, how does the tokens generate value? Everyone is trying to survive. Don't blame each other!
Jump to: