Topic: Why are people so eager to pay tax? - page 15. (Read 13657 times)

the act of disposing of it (for fiat or anything else) is what creates the capital gain. it doesn't matter if you sell it for 'fiat' currency, goods, services, land, or anything else.

the mistake people keep making is to assume that a nation's fiat currency has any special place in computing the timing or amount of capital gains, except as the denomination of value in which the tax is paid. the way the tax laws work is much simpler: if you buy something for something worth $X and trade it away for something worth $Y, you owe $(Y-X) in (capital gains) taxes.  (modulo, of course, the exceptions you mentioned, like bands of tax-free income for small amounts.)

+1+1 to the two last posts. We can not afford having people looking at Bitcoin as a way to cheat on their taxes, nor having a lot of people getting fined for not filing their income in Bitcoin correctly. Taxation guides for each country are being compiled in different threads for the challenged, as I myself was, at the start at the year when the numbers suddenly added up, and my hobby had become an income.

I am in the UK and have not yet cashed out any coin.

However when I do, I understand from a phone call to the HMRC and a cross check of their website, that I will be needing to pay capital gains tax over a certain tax free threshold, reset annually.

So although there is no 'Bitcoin Tax' the act of changing Bitcoin in to Fiat creates a Capital Gain.

So I just have to make sure that I stick within the £10k or so annual threshold and I don't pay a penny.

However, if I do happen to need to or want to exceed that threshold, will I pay the tax? Of course I fucking will, I don't need or want the hassle of a fine or jail time. Anyone who says otherwise is, in my opinion, a total imbecile.

Maybe their moral code is something more like, "It is OK to break the law if the law is unjust." Perhaps they think tax laws are unjust because the taxed do not get to choose where their contribution is used. They might not mind paying taxes for the building of public infrastructure, but they might mind paying taxes for bailing out mismanaged businesses or bombing other people halfway around the globe.

Once you get over the "crabs in a bucket" thing, yes.


As the OP, I assume that you are addressing me... Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're making some wrong assumptions. I haven't broken any laws at all. However, I'm a bit of an edge case and by far not typical of most people.


I'll leave that alone as you're making some wild assumptions with no basis.


Well, I can't disagree with it being a fantastic payment system.

But as for paying taxes... Why should anyone pay taxes that they don't need to? It's not that hard to get around a lot of tax laws. Yet still, there are many thread with people clambering to cough up when there are many, many ways for them to legally get around it.

A lot of people seem to think that there's no way around tax. Ahem... Google... Ireland... Ring a bell anyone?


And the current society is the ONLY one possible? There are no alternatives? Everything has been explored, and we've arrived at the pinnacle?

I find that rather unlikely.

I'm not saying that it's easy to think outside the box. But it seems like a lot of people really, really love the box.


Quite correct. BTC is not something that you *CAN* pay taxes in (the US).

you're not thinking about it correctly. we pay tax all the time on things we don't 'have'. for example, if you earn USD $15,000, you pay tax on that income regardless whether you spend it or save it.

the principle is really very simple, but most people who haven't studied it get very easily confused and make bad assumption after bad assumption. the united states's principle is very straightforward: you owe tax on all income received, from whatever source derived.

that includes noncash compensation. when something isn't cash, the value for tax purposes is its fair market value at the time you received it. of course, fair market value can be disputed; it is up to the taxpayer to declare it and the IRS to challenge it. (if an intentional understatement, it can lead to civil or criminal penalties.)

so if you buy 150 BTC at $100 and immediately use it to buy a car, you owe no tax merely because you used bitcoins. (you might owe a sales tax in the US on the car, of course.) if you buy 150 BTC at $50, wait until it appreciates to $100, and use it to buy a car, you owe $7500 in income (specifically, probably capital gains) taxes on the appreciation of the bitcoins.

as to barter, people pay tax on it all the time. individuals who barter for $200 probably cheat the government out of income to that amount, but sophisticated individuals and businesses that engage in noncash transactions certainly do pay tax. i have done it myself, to the tune one year of a $4 million tax bill.

as to the title of the thread, it is because not everyone is an extremist anarchist; most people adopt ethical systems that recognise the value of law and government and then adopt the principle that it is appropriate for the costs of government to be split based roughly on income. nobody thinks the tax system in any large country is perfect, but almost everyone in those countries (except in this often ridiculous forum) thinks it is better than having no government at all.

Backing my point even more then ty

Nobody actually pays tax on barter.

OK, if you had btc of $15,000 USD value (lets use a random number, 200 btc), then brought a car with that amount. You now have a car, would you still have to pay tax on the btc that you no longer have?

On the car, yes, same as in the UK. But you don't pay tax on stuff (money/btc) you don't have.

So, in the US you'd have to declare your btc, pay tax on that as if it was $15,000? (how do you propose to pay that tax in btc exactly? Does the IRS have a Bitcoin wallet now that I'm unaware of?).

Need to add (concerning UK), though you'd not pay taxes on 'bitcoin' until you changed it into fiat, you'd still be paying taxes on whatever commodity you were trading in.

As an exchange the rules are different, don't ask me on that.

+1 truer words have never been spoken.

No, the the attraction of Bitcoins is fast global payments an order of magnitude cheaper than anything else.

Of course you should pay taxes if your investment pays off. It's income just like anything else and that's what makes society work. If I had lived outside society I would statistically not have had the opportunity to learn about this stuff, let alone own a computer.

What you say about cash transactions is true for all foreign exchange speculation. Sure you can trade USD and JPY by meeting random people on the street from the classified section and exchange cash. Then all your speculation would be outside taxation. But if that seems like a worthwhile endevour for you, you are investing way too little!

This is a funny thread: You hate government control and taxes, you believe that officials are corrupt, you are a libertarian, so you agree to the notion of government, unless you are an ancap ideologist, so it's ok to be corrupt yourself? You like infrastructure, but you don't have to pay because you are smart enough to evade tax?

How is judging others as criminals an argument for breaking the law yourself?

Isn't it? 

Roads > Paid for with gasoline/petrol taxes
Schools > Paid for by property taxes

Not sure about fire & police departments.

But I'm not so sure that I like my tax dollars funding unlimited wars, bank bailouts, corporate bailouts, forced sterilizations, human experimentation on unwilling/unknowing subjects, and a truckload of other outright immoral and evil things.

No... I'd prefer not to help fund wholesale murder and corruption.

If you really want to fund murder, why not just do it yourself. Why do you need a middle man?




So, Joe decides to go on a long deserved holiday to Lovelyland, and purchases $2,000 Lovely dollars for $2,000 of his country's fiat dollar.

He returns from his Lovelyland holiday and goes to sell his remaining Lovely dollars, $1,000 as things were cheap and he was frugal. Much to Joe's suprise, oil, gas, diamonds, and the cure for cancer were all discovered in Lovelyland while he was away, and the Lovely dollar rose nicely. Joe end up recieving $2,000 of his country's fiat dollars for his $1,000 Lovely dollars.

1) Does Joe have to pay capital gains tax?
2) How is bitcoin different? (For those that purchase and are not professional traders.)




It's funny how often those that preach collectivist principles always end up calling for someone to die.



It seems like there are a lot of Americans in this forum, and a lot eager to cough up. I happen to have an advantage given my particular situation in that I'm not under any obligation in the country where I live to pay that particular tax.

Now, if you have money outside of your country of residence, it really isn't any business of the government of your country as it is outside of their sovereign territory and outside of their jurisdiction.

(Assuming you live in none of these places...)

You can go to Colorado and smoke pot.

You can go to Amsterdam for "intimate physical encounters".

You can go to Texas and own and shoot guns.

You can go to Vietnam and insult the king of Thailand. (God forbid you ever go to Thailand afterwards...)

But you're not going to face criminal charges where you live for what you do outside of that territory.

Why is bitcoin somehow magically different?

Large corporations and trusts do business in other countries simply to get around tax laws in their own countries?

Why do corporations get to avoid tax, but individuals don't?

*IF* you do your bitcoin activities where you live, then sure - you're doing it there.

If you are doing your bitcoin activities outside of where you live, then it's none of their business.

Does where you live necessitate that your local "authorities" somehow have absolute purveyance over everything you do and every aspect of your life, even outside of their jurisdiction?

I don't think so. Just because you live somewhere doesn't necessitate some kind of lien on your soul.

If you want to go whoring in Nevada, that's your business. It's legal there.

---

Perhaps a better question would be:

Why do people do bitcoin activity in jurisdictions where they will be liable for tax?


Here's something entertaining to think about as a minor distraction.

I can only speak to the USA, but converting it into something of value other than USD should still be a taxable event I believe. It'd fall under barter most likely:

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc420.html

That is, I pay you (as a barter since bitcoin isn't an actual legal tender, yet?) X bitcoins for a car worth $15,000 USD. That places my mined bitcoins at a value of $15,000 USD with a cost basis of zero, for a $15,000 realized gain.

I don't know how it is everywhere else (pretty sure its the same in the US, but don't quote me).

In the UK, you do NOT pay Bitcoin tax .. no matter what anyone says, it simply does NOT EXIST!

OK, that said, I do get a little   when people are like "amagad pay tax pay tax!"

What you pay tax on is the amount you change into FIAT. It is simply NOT considered capital gain, or bloomin' anything else.. might as well start trying to declare World of Warcraft gold or Eve online currency (can't remember what that's called) as your 'capital gains' ..

HMRC simply does not recognize Bitcoin as taxable .. yet.

Anyway .. that said .. if you're a sole trader, nps, keep changing your btc into fiat until you hit the 'tax cap' (working in expenditure), then declare and pay your taxes, not saying anything, but ye, this part is easily 'fiddled' (legally!).

If you're a private or public company, then yes, you'll run into 'messiness' if you try to 'fiddle' a lot and pretend you're not making any profit, and this is highly NOT advisable.

It IS advisable to change some to fiat in the terms of 'profit', declare that, and personally I'd make a point of explaining btc and that I was keeping some as btc and re-spending it as btc, encouraging hmrc to think about taxing it.


It will come, eventually, and it will be a good thing.

edit: Don't get me wrong, I'd much prefer to pick and choose who/where/what I pay my 'taxes' towards. But obviously quite a few potential and current businesses don't want to get closed or locked up for tax avoidance. And it's also the same argument as those that was Cannabis legalised as a 'free for all', no taxes whatsoever.

Taxes CAN be a good thing, if they're used appropriately. I'd be happy for more nurses/doctors/hospitals/better education/better public services, etc, etc

But ye.. current governments abuse the system very badly (surprise surprise...)

just seems like keyboard taxmen got know idea of what they are talking about, just trying to get the gullible who have made money to pay taxes

I'm pretty sure the "type" of gain from bitcoin is still to be decided.  I think it would be hard to argue that unrealised gains from held bitcoins are taxable.  By that same logic, unrealised gains from the Monet I have hanging in my loungeroom (I wish!!) are taxable income every year.

But to say that it's not at all taxable is just plain ignorant - but I acknowledge there is a difference between taxable and able-to-be-taxed.  

yup. but you don't have capital losses(unless you are stupid and bought at 266).