"Random" simply means that we can't track the noise. Everything that we know of operates by cause and effect. There is no evidence of pure random, spontaneity. There is no pure random in the thing we call random noise.
I am very sorry to inform you we don't live in the XIX century anymore and what you're stating is not a scientific statement.
Did somebody actually force you to say that we don't live in the XIX century anymore? Or do you enjoy being sad?
All you need do is look up the word "random" in dictionaries and encyclopedias to see that what I say is accurate.
Thank you. Now you are saying that you are speculating when you say there is no God.
Now you're saying that you are speculating when you say god exists.
Actually, the scientific proof that God exists is in the "Scientific proof that God exists?" thread at
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scientific-proof-that-god-exists-737322.
You are focusing on the definition of entropy.
Of course I am, entropy is what the definition of entropy says it is.
And the definition says (sometimes between the lines) that entropy exists in everything.
But as I said, just because an area suddently has greater complexity produced by something that is less complex, the less complex was given the ability to produce something more complex than itself by something even more complex than this produced complexity.
That's what you say, but it's not a scientific argument.
It's a scientific fact. No argument necessary.
Ultimately everything exists in a state of continual entropy overall... except God, that is.
Ultimately, you don't know what the words you're using mean.
So, you have been checking up on me, eh?
Like you know what other people know.
God is complex way beyond our understanding of complexity.
God doesn't exist. There's no complexity on that.
There you go, calling yourself God again, by suggesting you know for a fact that God doesn't exist, even in all those places nobody has checked for Him yet.
There you go, contradicting the fact that you haven't examined every portion of the universe, micro and macro, to see if God is there. And you certainly haven't gone outside the universe to check there.
You go first and recognise that your believe in god is just that, a belief, and then I'll try to be fair to you. How can I present a fair argument to someone that states senseless things like that there's a scientific demonstration that god exists? You go first and recognise yours is a believe, then I'll stop mocking you.
Until then: god doesn't exist.
I went first a long time ago, and found the scientific proof that God exists -
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scientific-proof-that-god-exists-737322. I know why you won't go and look at the proof. It's because you don't want to. Be careful! Hiding reality from yourself is dangerous, especially when that reality is God.