Topic: Why is signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media? (Read 634 times)
August 24, 2018, 09:09:09 AM
I think that they usually make it that the signature percentages are higher because the work done is usually more, and a wider or targeted audience is reached. There are a good number of investors on this platform, and a lot of them come here to get certain information. So signature bounty hunters usually get more stakes from carrying out tasks.
August 21, 2018, 07:55:14 PM
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others.
. In my opinion, signature campaigns have a bigger reward compare to social media campaigns because it provides heavier load of work since you are creating posts meticulously compare to social media campaigns where all you have to do is to share and put hashtag sometimes. The conclusion, the harder the work, the higher the reward.
And because of this one, sir KobbyC nailed it.
Social Media reaches a lot of people but signature reaches potential investors here on this platform.
For example, as a teacher, there's a greater chance of educating people even only from a bunch of interested listeners compare to a crowd of uninterested ones. I know there's a saying that "Every drop counts" but quantity doesn't matters the most all the time. August 21, 2018, 07:42:02 PM
You can participate in 100 social media campaigns at the same time, while only in 1 signature campaign. This should be the reason that media campaigns has far more participants than signature campaigns.
August 21, 2018, 11:13:12 AM
signature campaign is similar to forum ads thats why the allocated bounty pool is higher than the social media. every where you commented on these forum the ads sticks to you. and more crypto minded people are been reached here with the signature ads.
August 21, 2018, 10:51:22 AM
Because advertising in the signature occurs on the forum with people who already have a relationship with the crypto currency, and in social networks it is not always so.
August 21, 2018, 10:44:06 AM
You get a targeted audience using the Signature campaign. Also, people can participate in Multiple Social Media campaigns but only one Signature Campaign at a time.
And most of the times, the percentage allotted to Social Media campaigns is more. But, when the stakes are divided you receive less tokens for Social Media and more for Signature campaigns as less people participate in Signature campaigns.
And most of the times, the percentage allotted to Social Media campaigns is more. But, when the stakes are divided you receive less tokens for Social Media and more for Signature campaigns as less people participate in Signature campaigns.
August 21, 2018, 10:33:18 AM
I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
Social Media reaches a lot of people but signature reaches potential investors here on this platform. Also, signature campaigns are difficult to do as compared to social media. With the signature, you post daily, to get accounts is uneasy. But with social media, getting followers these days is very easy. Signature reach potential investors than social media I think. What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
August 21, 2018, 10:22:09 AM
Now the companies can catch easily users having promised them for a coin subscription. Usually these coins cost nothing. These are only a figures on the monitor. Few companies put heart and soul and energy in the projects.
August 21, 2018, 10:15:58 AM
I think that it is because the work is usually more tedious, and you spend way more time carrying out tasks for signature bounty campaigns. In addition, the forum has a larger audience that is reached, and this may be why people who partake in signature bounties tend to have the highest stakes allocated to them.
August 20, 2018, 07:57:49 AM
Because the signature works among people who already have to do with the crypto currency.
August 20, 2018, 07:40:37 AM
Active members of the forum participate in the discussion of different topics and give advice in different posts, the higher the rank of the participant the more confidence it causes in other users, among whom there are many investors and traders, so the signatures of such members of the forum cause trust and attract attention.Therefore, signature campaigns are considered very profitable, they are targeted at attracting the attention of potential investors and advertising projects.
August 20, 2018, 07:26:41 AM
Why the signature allocation is always higher than other? It is because their main target investors is bitcointalk users. Bitcointalk is on of the oldest and best Bitcoin forum, ETH and other great successful cryptocurrencies was born here.
August 20, 2018, 07:23:22 AM
Actually through other social media you may reach more people but signature campaign is more effective because you reach only those people who are totally involved in crypto world and are looking for suggestions and solutions to their queries.
I agree. There are thousands of altcoin investors here in this forum who are more knowledgeable about cryptocurrency than those person on your friends on your social media accounts. Besides, how many of those friends are seeing your post about the ICO you are endorsing? I believe that only 5% to 10% of your friends can only see your post and there is a small chance that they will invest to that ICO. Signature campaign have lesser participants but reaches higher numbers of investors because of this forum.
August 20, 2018, 06:26:43 AM
I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
Do you know why signature more relatively given high proportion on bounty campaign? It is because the target audience. Its plays a big role and most of the part you are on a crypto sphere with lots of potential investors talking about cryptocurrency. Unlike on social media not all of the audience are aware what cryptocurrency and how to invest. So quality over quantity you know the math.
August 20, 2018, 05:48:30 AM
I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.
Thats a good analysis but I don't think you are right about the participation number. If you are talking about the BTC based signature campaigns then surely they will have high participation because people get paid in the form of BTC which is direct payment method and it is also very much trusted.
Apart from this if you talking about the bounties then I dont think there is high numbered participation in them because bounties are too many and people can join only one campaign at a time.
Social media participation are always higher. Thats my observation and its true I guess.
August 20, 2018, 05:33:13 AM
Yes, the signature campaign commonly gets higher rewards than the social media. Firs is about its involvement in which the signature participants must have qualified posts in the bitcointalk forum only. The posts must be qualified and on topic as stated in the rules. Additionally, it obligates the participants to wear the signature, personal text, or avatar during the bounty campaign or ICO. Therefore, I think signature participant is suitable to get higher rewards.
August 20, 2018, 05:11:08 AM
In my opinion, social campaigns are not as effective as a signature campaign. Beginners and learn about ico will participate in the forum and they will feel confident when the high rank members are signed on 1 ico. The current media is quite thin, and most are non-quality ads.
In signature campaign you wear an avatar and signature of the campaign to promote and gather an investor for the project that you joined. In social media of course is also to promote but not that like in signature because the big investor and almost all people that having an interest in crypto currency will be here in forum. That's the reason why signature campaign are having a high percentage of rewards than social media campaign.
August 20, 2018, 02:07:13 AM
Signature campaign can only be done through bitcointalk form. The bitcointalk forum is the largest community of the crypto investors. As a result of this, bitcointalk forum is the largest platform through which a project can be promoted. Through the signature of the promoting members, investors that are willing can know more about such project.
Signature campaign is not as porous as that of social media where anyone can just open account whenever they like and it is ready for you.
Also, social media is more of bounty hunters than investors.
Signature campaign is not as porous as that of social media where anyone can just open account whenever they like and it is ready for you.
Also, social media is more of bounty hunters than investors.
August 20, 2018, 01:59:26 AM
I agree with the previous commentators - the signature company is designed for a narrower range of people interested directly in cryptocurrencies. Social networks, although they have more coverage, do not affect so many potential investors.
August 20, 2018, 01:25:24 AM
In my opinion, social campaigns are not as effective as a signature campaign. Beginners and learn about ico will participate in the forum and they will feel confident when the high rank members are signed on 1 ico. The current media is quite thin, and most are non-quality ads.
Jump to: