Why is signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media? - page 3.

gaj ahmada

full member

Activity: 616

Merit: 100

Quote from: ansi on August 08, 2018, 06:03:26 PM

It's totally logic to be that way since BitCointalk is all about cypto niche, so every single post / exposure matters for real since all people in this forum are PRO-Cryptos.

In social media your followers can be non-crypto fan so it's not like always a good go with social media marketing, that's why always the Signature campaign is always more than social media campaign.

Yes, you are right
because everyone in this forum is people who are interested in crypto while not all of them on social media are crypto fans, so the signature campaign is considered better and more effective for advertising the project, therefore the results for the signature campaign are bigger ,rules about social media are also easier because we only repost or retweet while in the signature campaign we have to make constructive and quality posts

agenlaptop

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

I also thought so, but I saw that the signature campaign had more patents than social media, although basically through social media we were reaching more people who saw it, and there were also bounties whose social media campaigns were bigger than signature campaigns.

erjanite

newbie

Activity: 144

Merit: 0

It's actually about the effort that you gave in marketing an ICO that's why it's higher than any other campaign.

bestcoins1

hero member

Activity: 2240

Merit: 725

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Because in the signature campaign we help promote the ICO project that we follow into the forum where, seekers, investors, and everyone who joins cryptocurrency and understand it about cryptocurrency. Whereas in social media, indeed we help develop ICO projects for people, but some of them must be indifferent because they do not know what you are sharing and for what you are sharing.

vKedax

member

Activity: 420

Merit: 10

For the signature campaign, more funds are allocated, and fewer people participate than in social networks. I think, because of this, the reward in the subscription campaign is higher.

khanza

jr. member

Activity: 114

Merit: 2

in the signatures, it is easier to understand about good projects to be followed, while for social media only people understand who knows about this project From that the rewards for social media projects are smaller in return

Kelvinikke

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 10

A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

This is because ICOs that are being run are based on cryptocurrency investments and most of the crypto related people are in this forum so it would be wise enough to campaign in this community so that cryptopreneurs can invest into it rather than just sending it to the outside world who don't know much about crypto investments.

Enzos

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 10

This is very easy to understand, for several reasons：

1.You can only participate once in the signature campaign, but you can participate in many bounty campaigns at the same time as Twitter and Facebook.
2.All members of the BTT Forum are players of crypto, which are more effective than Twitter and Facebook.
3.BTT rank is very difficult to upgrade, you need merit, and the well-known merit is not so easy to get. Low rank participants can't get too many stakes.And Twitter and Facebook can easily have a large number of followers.
4.The difficulty of signature campaign is also much more difficult than that of Twitter campaign. The difficulty of replying posts 10+ per week is much higher than that retweets 3-5 weekly.
5.The number of participants in Social Mediad is usually much larger than the number of signing bounty participants, so Social Mediad participants can allocate stakes will become very small.

Olalomi

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 12

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Signature campaigns is usually allocated with a high stakes because this forum itself has potentials investors who view and research on the ICOs and most members here really know the modus operandi of cryptos and how to invest in it better than those in the social media and higher proportion of people do obtain more information about the ICOs here.

paramelton

member

Activity: 171

Merit: 10

The first thing is the targeting, in signature campaign your advert is visible only to targeted audition, because everyone in this forum IS INTO crypto. Second thing is to build your members rank in the forum, which is much harder then building 3000 followers in twitter for example. And third thing is that you can participate only in one signature campaign at a time, while twitter and facebook, allows you to earn even from 20 different campaigns at the same time.

stefven

newbie

Activity: 224

Merit: 0

I think the allocation that given to the signature campaign is equivalent to what is done by bounty hunters. usually, signature campaign requires a longer time and also does heavier tasks as stated in the rule. that way I think that's normal if the signature campaign provides a big allocation than others.

Ramtapsbtc

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 10

IMO, signature bounty campaign got the highest allocation among all the campaign is because you engage more on the crypto enthusiast that are looking for possible project to invest in. Besides that if you participate in signature campaign you only focus on that particular ICO unlike if you participate in social media wherein you can have multiple participation.

kaya11

full member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 110

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

So much good reasons why signature is the best way to earn a bounty token. One is that Bitcointalk is a very popular forum with millions of traffics visited by users who are investors in crypto currencies every month. They go here to validate and research some of the great projects that are going to launch. Social media sites are solely for socializing and not for promoting sites and ICOS, Bitcointalk can be used to promote and using signatures-like banners to represent ht ICO you are supporting.

Bttzed03

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1149

https://bitcoincleanup.com/

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

It is not always the case. There are some ICO's that allocate less to signature campaigns. Anyway, I think it is usually higher for most campaigns because the target audience are all crypto enthusiasts unlike in social media.

ayo_deji1

newbie

Activity: 152

Merit: 0

I think Signature campaign are always higher than other campaigns due to the promotions and different advertisements of lots of projects on this platform. Also, the fact that signature campaigns do not really have much people as one cannot join a signature campaign twice gives it a higher reward.

jefcasidy

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 2

The ProFish online marketplace & tournaments

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Social media is mostly for meeting and connecting with people all around the world, social media is not really a crypto based platform, so promoting bounty on the social might not be targeting the right people and most of them don't know anything about cryptos, but it's not the same with bitcointalk.

gela888gela

newbie

Activity: 141

Merit: 0

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

You are right, social media campaigns have a wider range of information than signature campaigns. However, information targets in social media campaigns are still random and only a small part can be said to be right on target because not everyone involved in social media understands crypto. In contrast to the signature campaign in the forum that is all involved in the crypto world and it is considered more targeted.

coinbirds

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 104

In signature campaign you can participate only with one account at the same time while in social media campaigns
you can participate in multi campaigns (some of them participate in more than 100 campaigns at the same time).
Signature ranks are not easily achievable especially after introduction of merit system and signature campaign participants
are more involved in Crypto and they are very often investing as well.

angelica laura

jr. member

Activity: 229

Merit: 1

I think each bounty has determined many tokens that they will allocate as rewards. If the participant's campaign is a bit, it will certainly get a lot of coins. Most bounties use stake to calculate the amount of our reward. If we get a little stake, there are also a few coins that we will receive. In the signature campaign, Sr. Members upwards will be paid with a large stake every week.

ityandsyn

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 11

Quote from: upyem2k on August 08, 2018, 01:43:37 PM

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Maybe it is because signature campaign is more on academical approach when we make a reply or quoting in this forum and it is done with the best of our knowledge, just to elaborate the topic requested by our co-member. So maybe this is their basis of apportionment of tokens .

Topic: Why is signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media? - page 3. (Read 634 times)