this is a hot topic I keep seeing. social media and blockchain and what that means for the general public and our privacy. I don't think the big players are planning to shift to a decentralized system but rather just put our data on the blockchain
this article made a lot of sense to me in the why behind these actions
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/why-are-social-network-juggernauts-facebook-and-twitter-moving-towards-blockchain-technology/
Topic: Why Mark Zuckerberg wants no privacy - page 5. (Read 962 times)
It's intessting to read that David Chaum reached out to Mark only to be turned down or ignored. Mark runs his own show
I was thinking that too!!! Did some resarch on https://nakamotoinstitute.org/literature/ and David Chaum is actually mentioned a few times in these papers
....we will be shown more targeted ads. I feel this shall completely violate our privacy, and I feel the only option is to delete those three apps and live happily.
This is not about targeted ads.
It's about world dominion.
All of these little bits of data about every aspect of our lives can be combined to make a VERY accurate psychological and logistic profile of each of us. This information can then be fed into large scale simulations that can scale from the global down the the individual granular level. They can make small changes to this simulation to see statistically likely outcomes and tweak their methodology until they get the results they want. This is why they have been hoovering up every tiny little piece of info about everyone they can like mad. Every bit more they can add increases the predictive accuracy. This isn't sci-fi, this has been happening for some time. Also combined with AI, you can see how this leads us down a very dark path very quickly...
It is very difficult to comprehend when we realise the amount of our private information that has been put out there simply because we want to make use of popular social platforms outlets like Facebook and WhatsApp. There is more to be done to ensure users are fully protected from any form of abuse so far as their private life is concerned.
Hey you’re completely misled if you’re going to believe that combing those three platforms will be beneficial for us, it’s not going to be. In my personal opinion when he combines all three he gets to study how we type what products are we discussing, and we will be shown more targeted ads. I feel this shall completely violate our privacy, and I feel the only option is to delete those three apps and live happily.
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
Does this mean that it's privacy is at risk?According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
Because he needs more money and Authority.
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
He might be planning to combine everything and come up with a blockchain platform but for them to talk about privacy is just a joke when they were collecting user password and stored in plain text format, so that is how they go about user privacy and storing sensitive data. It means nothing for the society, people who are addicted to social media platforms, they will be using it even if it is insecure.thoughts? what does this mean for society?
Security and privacy is based on your ability to give out information on a need to know basis.
There is only one point of view in which Zuck has a need to know your info.
In his own mind.
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
He might be planning to combine everything and come up with a blockchain platform but for them to talk about privacy is just a joke when they were collecting user password and stored in plain text format, so that is how they go about user privacy and storing sensitive data. It means nothing for the society, people who are addicted to social media platforms, they will be using it even if it is insecure. thoughts? what does this mean for society?
what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?
Obviously it is all about metadata. He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.
I suspect it can also be various three letter government agencies, non-governmental organization (NGO) and as it is free market, anyone who's ready to pay. Data is the new oil, who owns it has power.
what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?
Obviously it is all about metadata. He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.
....There is more to be done to ensure users are fully protected from any form of abuse so far as their private life is concerned.
It's a bit like asking the pedophiles to report on the children?
It is very difficult to comprehend when we realise the amount of our private information that has been put out there simply because we want to make use of popular social platforms outlets like Facebook and WhatsApp. There is more to be done to ensure users are fully protected from any form of abuse so far as their private life is concerned.
what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?
Obviously it is all about metadata. He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.
Should I post here the story of Whatsup creators again?
Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.
Whatapp is still owned by Facebook as far as I know,so still the story repeats again with facebook,whatapp and instagram. Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.
Should I post here the story of Whatsup creators again?
Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.
Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.
Sure, post it again. Some things really should be repeated over and over.
Then they get totally boring. Like Facebook.
Facebook is the biggest spy in the world and it has almost the details of every person in this world except new born babies but still they know that from others post.
SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.
SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.
That's pretty much totally correct.
There's zero reason to believe anything they say.
Just look at their history of data leaks and losses.
Then look at the things they have told us that turned out to totally not be true.
Zuckerberg either wants more money, or more control, or more power, or his life has been threatened by others who have much greater power than he, that if he doesn't toe the line, they will make him suffer.
Facebook is the biggest spy in the world and it has almost the details of every person in this world except new born babies but still they know that from others post.
SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.
SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.
https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.
thoughts? what does this mean for society?
It means he is a liar.
It's pretty simple. Why in the world would you want to protect such a person?
Jump to: