There are many reasons why online casinos may not offer games that allow players to bet against each other. Online casinos are businesses. As such, they need to generate revenue in order to stay in business. In traditional casino games, the house has an advantage over the players. This is known as the "house edge." By offering games where players bet against each other, a casino would not be able to take a cut of wagers and would not be able to generate revenue in the same way. The house edge is what makes online casinos profitable. In addition, many online casinos are simply not set up in a way that allows them to offer player-vs.-player games. The software they use may not be designed for this type of gameplay and may need to be modified before it can be used effectively.
Topic: Why there are no cool games - page 6. (Read 787 times)
There's this thread that's also asked about PVP esports games and if it's possible for the casinos to have them. But if can't be found on any casino, you can start your own community doing this type of betting and gaming.
Now, the question starts with how can you be sure that someone won't have that automated responses to their attacks and counter-attacks against other opponents by installing some software that it can be done possibly.
Now, the question starts with how can you be sure that someone won't have that automated responses to their attacks and counter-attacks against other opponents by installing some software that it can be done possibly.
One of the challenges that confront the fast-growing gaming I industry is the lack of p2p virtual games but am sure there development is underway, with some casinos already offering such player-to-player games on the casinos but mostly in unpopular games. But games like mortals combats are old popular games that players will love to see them back on the casinos with advanced features and outlooks that will give combatants a nice experience playing those old games again, I believe the web3 virtual gaming industry is growing fast and soon we will have web3 casino offering such games for their client to enjoy and compete against each other.
The problem that all these developers face is the same and that's cheating. In a game of chance the casino "rolls" and can prove that the number was randomly chosen. You cannot cheat. The only way to cheat is if you're able to somehow hack the API and see what the house has rolled before rolling yourself. I remember that this used to be possible in some early casinos years ago especially when playing blackjack. The casino would roll and you'd be able to see what it has and could choose to fold early if it had a high number.
With PVP games you're not playing against the house but someone else and the casino has no way to verify if you both play fair. You could be using bots, scripts, macros, just like people who play CS.
When a player gets caught cheating in CS it results in a ban, but it doesn't happen in the first round. Usually a player is able to play for a while before being caught.
Imagine that you'd cheat in a casino and withdraw after each game. After playing 3 games they'd ban you, but the money from your previous wins would already be lost. People would think it's worth getting banned if they can get some free money out of it.
Hem!! First of all, there is no reason to denigrate what exists and in fact you look very bad, because if we do a survey of traditional casino games and what you mention, you will be last with your proposal.
The fact that you do not see it does not mean that it does not exist, in any case online you can find many niches where games are organized with FtoF.
The fact that you do not see it does not mean that it does not exist, in any case online you can find many niches where games are organized with FtoF.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
It's not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
Opening the games to players vs players is your idea of competition, The casino's want the competition to be between you and them more than they want the competition to be between you and another player. And just as already said that the casinos are businesses that always prioritize making high profits, the casino's stand a better chance making more when you compete with them than when you compete with another person that they will have to share the profit with.It's not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
The casino can generate income regardless of who the client plays with, whether it is the casino itself or another client because the casino has its own percentage of the turnover.
Most casinos do not develop games themselves, but buy them from developers who specialize in casino software.
In my opinion the idea of OP is difficult to implement and it is not known a few will be in demand since much in such a game will depend not only on the experience of the players, but also the latency of the Internet, the possibility of fraud, etc. Casino is much easier to buy a ready-made game that will work on the server and make money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
However, bets like this already exist in local gaming shops where both players wager a certain amount that the winner will keep.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
It's not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
Opening the games to players vs players is your idea of competition, The casino's want the competition to be between you and them more than they want the competition to be between you and another player. And just as already said that the casinos are businesses that always prioritize making high profits, the casino's stand a better chance making more when you compete with them than when you compete with another person that they will have to share the profit with. It's not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
Casinos may prefer to add poker games to beat their opponents by having better cards than their opponents. We've seen a lot of casino sites that have poker games, and it's probably commonplace in those casinos. But for player versus player, as you mean, it's not so much. Maybe this is more of a trend currently developing so that casinos only follow existing trends and try to develop them by owning or adding other gambling games that are expected to attract more gamblers.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
Remember that casinos are designed in order for them to profit. As this is considered as a business, releasing games that are mostly skilled-based (pvps, etc.) compared to the traditional luck-based games (poker, slots, etc.) would hurt the profit of the establishment. If a person can win purely based on skill, then it somehow eliminates the element of luck on which a casino is founded on gambling.
In conclusion, there would be no "gambling" per se and as it can completely change the whole business model of the casino. I think that is the reason on why gambling companies are hesitant to release such games to date.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
This games which are PvP is very interesting when you are very skillful in it but the casinos don't like such since there will be little or no profit for them. There are ways in which players can cheat on PvP games.Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
You can gamble on such game like tenken in an offline casino which I know do welcome gamblers that are willing to play. Yoshimushi use to be my best fighter way back in high school when we do spend most of the weekends playing video games.
Yes, I think this is the main reason, they are not going to make money out of it so they are not going to released or make it available to the public.
No question that it's exciting for us, from the perspective of P2P like Tekken as this is the very stable of one one matches. But as casino are business, they will have to weight everything the cons and pros and it just shows that they are leaning towards the latter and so they won't incorporate it. Although there could be casinos that have specialized on it, but as we have seen, they are not as popular as a online casinos that have sports bet and slot machines and games that can be find on regular land base casinos.
Snipped
There was a recent thread about casinos incorporating p2p games like Mortal Kombat where those who wager will be playing against themselves. And I believe the Tekken mobile you mention is still something akin to the earlier Mortal Kombat.
Since gamblers will not be relying solely on luck in this scenario, I doubt that the majority of them will agree to it, though there will be some who will strongly agree on this being integrated into casinos. After all, you shouldn't expect everyone to embrace your suggestions; there will always be those who will oppose it.
However, bets like this already exist in local gaming shops where both players wager a certain amount that the winner will keep.
You're right, I've also come across the thread similar to this, but there are games already in function like this but it has to do with the kind of gambling station you've got within your environment, this kinds of games are more of virtual games, they are gsmes you can modify the characters you want and get equipped, the more you stand strong the more chsnces for your life survival while playing it, also you can connect the internet through it and make payment for the exact amount you want to play and choose the user you esnt to take up in challenge.
I'm a bit confused by what you're saying here. I first disagree with you that these types of games are boring, as I find them quite interesting. That being said, do you mean like video games? Like being able to go on a casino website and play games like Tekken or Mortal Kombat and being able to bet on that? I'm not sure this would be very easy implement, that is if this is what you mean..like gambling video games?
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
This games which are PvP is very interesting when you are very skillful in it but the casinos don't like such since there will be little or no profit for them. There are ways in which players can cheat on PvP games.Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
You can gamble on such game like tenken in an offline casino which I know do welcome gamblers that are willing to play. Yoshimushi use to be my best fighter way back in high school when we do spend most of the weekends playing video games.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
Player vs Player games can be rigged, some users can use hacks in the games to see through the wall or use some special game controller with the turbo function, there are tons of ways to get an advantage on any skills game, and that's why people don't use to bet like that.
But if you think that's fair play you could bet on the E-Sports section, and you can see the matches live and enjoy the games while you make money.
Tekken is old school. this is a game i have played before , same time when i get to stay in the house of a friend for a week just playing the tekken or twisted metal. Twister Metal game will be good to play too for 1v1 game and we could bet each other.
its not that there is no developer have yet figured this out but i'm guessing this will be more difficult to host and develop than dice and roulette. if you have the taste for these games, you can just try the esports.
its not that there is no developer have yet figured this out but i'm guessing this will be more difficult to host and develop than dice and roulette. if you have the taste for these games, you can just try the esports.
I think fighting games are really unfair for professional gamers since they can win the game easily or sell it out for easy money if they knew a lot of people are betting for them. I know that there is some gambling game like you bet for a game like Dota 2, LOL, or Mobile legends.
Tekken is old school. this is a game i have played before , same time when i get to stay in the house of a friend for a week just playing the tekken or twisted metal. Twister Metal game will be good to play too for 1v1 game and we could bet each other.
its not that there is no developer have yet figured this out but i'm guessing this will be more difficult to host and develop than dice and roulette. if you have the taste for these games, you can just try the esports.
its not that there is no developer have yet figured this out but i'm guessing this will be more difficult to host and develop than dice and roulette. if you have the taste for these games, you can just try the esports.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
The thing with PvP is that it's hard to cope when most don't like the game at all, most gamblers doesn't want the hassle to play for like an hour and then win just a few amount then minus to what the house will get. Poker is even great on the casino gambling side among gamblers yet it still have difficulty for casinos to have lot of players. I think cool games aren't for gambling, it's solely for gaming lads. 
-snip-
Love to hear that.I see you are interested on this topic, I have some one thread created by me about "PVP Game" (against player): https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54632401 feel free to read.
But most of the game/casino already closed, the main problem is for distribution & marketing.
There is just a thread just like this talking about Player vs player which is this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-we-ever-going-to-see-this-on-gambling-platforms-some-day-5429466
It will be a cool game but there will be issues. I didn't think of one until I read someone can just get out of the game or unplug his computer when he sees he is losing. This will be a big issue for the game and in games where money is involved, always assume everyone can cheat.
There a things called "Poker"
You can play against player not the house, so the perfect game you're looking for is "Poker". It's a game not only just based the luck you can get for the card, but the skill like emotion, poker-face & etc.
Try poker.
You can play against player not the house, so the perfect game you're looking for is "Poker". It's a game not only just based the luck you can get for the card, but the skill like emotion, poker-face & etc.
Try poker.
I like to play poker face to face when I read my opponent body language. Voice level and i like to play there only.
There is nothing more fun to read them try to bluff you and see them lose after .
on internet is very hard to know. who bluff and who not need to rely on memory.
Jump to: