There a things called "Poker"
You can play against player not the house, so the perfect game you're looking for is "Poker". It's a game not only just based the luck you can get for the card, but the skill like emotion, poker-face & etc.
Try poker.
Topic: Why there are no cool games - page 7. (Read 794 times)
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
There are some gambling games where you can duel against other players but that could still look boring to you if you compare it to your example of a PVP. It would probably take more resources for casinos to put up such type of games than you imagine so it makes sense to focus only on the usual.Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
Maybe ask those creators of games such as Tekken why they don't add a betting feature.
Ask or wait for someone to organize it then. If it is esports betting then, unfortunately, not all online or ny kind of gme would be featured. Games on esports betting are mostly ones with huge community of players. If I'm not mistaken, p2p games such as tekken and mortal combat, has not that large community of players; mostly are the ones with consoles at home. Unlike with MOBA type of game or multiplayer games which somehow has a bigger fan base. I'm not quite sure why. I've experienced playing 'versus' games and they re fun to play but ofcourse 'majority' would be more considered. If you really like to, you may find fellow bettors on a p2p tournament to somehow be ble to bet on it. But it would be hard to assume it on a bigger 'stage' on this industry, atleast for now.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
There was a recent thread about casinos incorporating p2p games like Mortal Kombat where those who wager will be playing against themselves. And I believe the Tekken mobile you mention is still something akin to the earlier Mortal Kombat.
Since gamblers will not be relying solely on luck in this scenario, I doubt that the majority of them will agree to it, though there will be some who will strongly agree on this being integrated into casinos. After all, you shouldn't expect everyone to embrace your suggestions; there will always be those who will oppose it.
However, bets like this already exist in local gaming shops where both players wager a certain amount that the winner will keep.
The technology today is bad only dice, roullete and the normal games like slots.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
Its not competitive. Why not open games players vs players.
For example somethign similar to Tekken on a browser.
you can choose 4 characters.
Opponent can choose 4 characters.
Betting can be from 5$ to 300$. The winner of 3 rounds take all money.
The more hours you play the more skilled you get and can get confident in changing bet size.
Jump to: