Topic: Will chatgpt really destroy the job market? - page 3. (Read 1085 times)

I totally agree, companies will definitely increase their AI usage rates in order to continue production more efficiently with less cost. Although this situation is something that will increase the efficiency of the company, unfortunately it has the potential to cause huge unemployment which poses a danger for people in many job groups. Moreover, if we consider that AI technology is in the development stage today both ChatGPT and other AI software will develop much more in the future and will be able to perform more serious operations compared to now. Although this is something that will contribute to production efficiency it will unfortunately cause people working in many occupational groups to lose their jobs.

Most likely yes, because at the moment we do not know all the possibilities that AI will be able to own, after a while, when it will improve. All this should lead to an improvement in the quality of human life, but at the initial stages it can deprive many jobs. At one time, the mechanization of production processes also led to the fact that robots replaced people and were able to work more, and people lost their jobs.

I certainly do not think that ChatGPT will destroy the job market. It will have so many government regulations that this will prevent it from taking over certain jobs. Besides at this point, it is still in early stages that it is still not 100% capable of taking over any jobs.

I think that maybe in the future there will be a greater competition with ChatGPT verus humans. I’m hoping that this will eventually be more positive than negative. Knowing that we are transitioning into a different form of how we can somehow better our lifestyle. Take it as improving wellbeing and knowing that we can do better.

It creates new opportunities for others, and others may also lose some, like, let's say, replacing those people with a chat bot, but still, it is not completely replaced because there is still live support needed. What's really good is that it can ease your job, like me, who likes automating stuff so that there is less work, but the cons are that those students have the biggest problem right now because those assignments can easily be solved, and the problem is that they don't understand it. I hope it will be used for good.

AI technologies like ChatGPT have the power to transform the job market by automating certain tasks. However, they also create new opportunities and drive positive change. To thrive in this evolving landscape, it is critical to adapt and engage in continuous learning.

Don't rely solely on AI, but be a smart user by evaluating and verifying the output produced by AI technology. By embracing new skills and staying up-to-date, individuals can navigate the changing job market and take advantage of the opportunities that arise from advances in AI.

I think chatgpt will not totally destroy the job market. I think they can still help normal people to automate certain tasks that the people are having difficult with. There are also concerns about the accuracy and bias of chatgpt which may require human checking.Chatgpt will not be able to completely replace interaction of individuals in different fields where human connection is crucial. The chatbots may automate certain tasks and reduce the need for some jobs, they may also create new opportunities and enhance efficiency in other areas.

I dare you to find a single expert that would say that the advance of AI will have no impact on the job market in the future. That's a preposterous claim.
You yourself admit that AI acts as an assistant - well, is that assistant efficient? Can it help a person process more work in the same time? If so, the more efficient that "assistant" is, the fewer people you need to do the same amount of work, meaning some of them are no longer needed. It's not hard to grasp, is it?

most jobs need a hand from actual employees. so yeah, chatgpt won't replace the workforce. it may be good in answering some questions, but how can you expect them to do like basic home chores, fix machines, do hard labor, etc. so people should not worry about the rise of this technology. you can still have an advantage over AI, you have the human mind and physical body that AI can't replace with.
there may be specific jobs that may replace this chatgpt but as a human, you have all the advantages to find an alternative job where chatgpt is not a employed in any way.

In market field, people will always try to find the unique one and choose them as their first choice. AI is a thing that is taught by limited knowledge. It has restrictions that it can not overcome if not a human is involved to program it that way.
Low budget or low quality tasks could be done by AI, there's no doubt. But when it comes to refine tasks and a human touch is needed, AI will never be the primary choice. I saw a very informative video which includes a discussion between Arun(YouTuber of the largest tech channel called Mrwhosetheboss) and the CEO of Google Sundar Pichai. This is the YouTube link with the timestamp so that you can jump right into the important part of the video. Click here
So what I want to say after this is that we will learn to live our daily life and AI technology will not ruin the flow of our life. If implemented correctly, it will help us in a lot of situations and with human and AI combined, we will have a life that is unimaginable. Calculator for an example. Many thought that we will lose the ability to do math correctly if we are introduced to calculators. Look at us now how it has made our life easy and in every situation of calculation we are using calculator. AI will do the same one day, that's for sure. So the job market may struggle for a bit in the beginning, but as we get used to it and start using it the right way, I don't think people will lose their job, rather many will join the market with the help of AI and they will create their own way of doing things with the mix of human brain and the capability of AI.

I don't think it will have any global impact in the future. One way or another, companies will hire experienced employees with a greater knowledge and skills base, and artificial intelligence now works more as an assistant than completely replacing a person. This will definitely not affect all professions, but optimization in the IT world will definitely happen, but I don’t think it will happen very soon.

the world would probably change a lot, because of something like that,
now everything is all technology.
so it's likely that some of the old jobs will be replaced by AI, and new jobs will also emerge in the future.
everything must be in balance if you really want the earth to continue to develop.

Job competition in the future involves humans and AI technology. The presence of ChatGPT was the start that made many people worry about increasing unemployment. For companies, of course, the presence of AI technology is the best efficiency so that it is easier to achieve profits.

As I know, the ban on chatGPT in some countries is due to privacy and not because the government is afraid it will cause unemployment. But whatever the reason, we live in an age where technology is an inevitable part of life. So we need to adapt to them, not to fear and avoid them. The more technology develops, the more we need to raise awareness and knowledge to take advantage of it to benefit us, don't let them rob us of our jobs. We need to grow up and adapt to everything, don't stay in one place forever, you will be eliminated. That is the law of life.

Banning something is hardly an effective strategy, maybe you can control the cotton and material making industry of a local economy but here we are talking about information handling.   To ban just means to ask 'please another country, other people take this business away as we prefer to work longer hours on repetitious tasks'.  They will block any import of that product at a lower cost then we can do; this is just the thinking of a dictator manipulating their country to their own advantage.
  Society wont gain from banning the use of technology any more then it did in attempts to do so hundreds of years ago as in every advance forward people feared and attempted to obstruct it; perfectly natural reaction but an economy is indirect and macro picture view to gains a nation might realize in sum total.

You're mistaken, many European countries have banned Chatgpt because of privacy, it collects too much user data without their permission. They are not afraid it will affect the job market, even they don't care about it because our world is becoming modern, technology development is inevitable. Moreover, how an automated talking tool can destroy the job market. Is that too absurd?

Don't say that; most of the technology we are using today has good intentions and has made our lives easier, but few of them are at a greater disadvantage than the major purpose they were built for. If ChatGPT operates the way it is programmed to operate and is integrated into a talking machine, what else do you think the real world will need some teachers for? When all they have to do is buy some machines and let them speak and educate their students, by doing so they will reduce the number of needed teachers in every given institution. Which will increase the number of unemployed citizens; on the other hand, business owners will see it as a means to save up fewer funds.


This is the reason why most scientists and other world researchers are already fighting against the rapid growth of this so-called robot and AI adoption, because a time will come when those machines will reprogram themselves to harm their developers. Everything in this world has its place, and those machines should just be used for their intended purposes and nothing more than that.


It's only the greedy that worship money; money is meant to be earned, made, and used for the exchange of our daily needs and nothing more than that. It's those who want more from money and are doing something extra ordinary just to make that money, for which they can't even define the real purpose of why they need it, who should be classified as people worshipping money, not everyone.

Used in place of humans,
Technology can never replace humans. ChatGPT only accesses the information that exists online and have been fed to it by you and I. Therr isn't anything more than that and at most, it could be wrong too, don't you think. Giving you information in the context that isn't of much importance.

Be it as  it may, the human perspective is unique and that's something some bot can't handle. While ChatGPT might help you to understand better, there would always be limitations to it.

People should also change with the change of era. And if man cannot adopt with the time then he must fall back. If people are afraid of chat GPT then there is nothing to do because instead they should try how they can make themselves more efficient. There are some downsides to using chat GPT based on which many countries are planning to ban it but according to the up gradation of technology AI tools including chat GPT are being used more and more.

I believe that if AI is replacing human labor in a specific field, it means that job isn't necessary anymore. It doesn't have a reason to exist anymore, and if it still existed, it would be solely in proof of charity for someone in order to not let him without an income. AI will really destroy some niches of jobs market, but that is inevitable taking evolution and technological development in consideration. It's not a new phenomenon in this world to see this happening.

What people have to do is to adapt themselves to the currently reality the world is facing. To explore or create new niches of jobs market. To make themselves useful for the new demands the world is imposing on the people. To protest against AI asking for a kind of censorship against it won't work, as it has never worked so far in humanity's history...

At the moment its just a convenient tool made for us. Why do people bother to use it
and make it more and more acceptable to do so?

At what point will someone engage AI to research a particular topic and use ChatGPT
to research the internet instead of hiring a human to do so?

A "convenient tool" can easily become too convenient and the go-to means because its
a "convenient FREE tool"

At what point in the future with engaging AI instead of a human to do research
become the everyday norm? if it means humans can save money it will become
the everyday norm, we generally ignore warning signs if it challenges our ability to
make more and more money.