Topic: Will chatgpt really destroy the job market? - page 8. (Read 1085 times)

It all depends on how the technology will be used. There is a great convenience for those who want their employees to work faster and solve problems, or there is another option for those who want to have a single person do this quick job and solve the problems. So the answer to the question here depends entirely on the business and the people. If the solutions provide high returns, there is no need to fire people. But if the solutions say both high returns and a reduction in workforce are needed, layoffs ensue. These artificial intelligences have not yet fully penetrated the market. We can find the answer to these questions in 2-3 years.

I think chatgpt will actually make freelance work easier for many people because as the boss of a business person you shouldn't have to do anything even if it's easy to do because there are still a lot of things that a boss has to do instead of having to solve it yourself with AI. unless someone thinks he can do it himself, but I'm sure the effort isn't that big, because he'll be short on connections.

the jobs that will be available may only be in the field of AI improvement so I think that unemployment will increase greatly and of course there is a way to adapt this will take a long time. adherents of the government will not remain silent regarding humanitarian needs and it seems that even that opportunity is not big

Maybe in the future, but currently I don't see AI as a huge threat to the employee status in the economy since companies would still rather hire a professional people to do some specific task. AI might be convenient to people but you couldn't still do those tasks by all yourself by just asking AI for help. For example, in a company there's someone that are checking the times in different country per day which AI could actually do. Do you prefer to do the task by the help of AI or Make your employee do the task with accuracy and time efficient work that worth the salary. You might save some money with the labour cost but it wouldn't help a company to grow.

There are pros and cons in the use case of AI technology in work systems - some consider it can damage the system, while some will think it will enhance it. I'm not too worried if this artificial intelligence is used as intended, but if it is abused - then there will obviously be great harm as consequence. There are always negative and positive effects about new technology - so it must be used wisely to minimize the problems it causes.

OP, I really do not think chatgpt would destroy the labour market. What I just think is that it would make workers lousy and dull in fast thinking as it used to be. Chatgpt rather makes work more easier and faster in response and generating of solutions to urgent quests at hand which seems rather difficult but my fear is that humans now will solely depend on it for response and put which is not welcoming although it can generate solutions but it can not do muscular activities like humans. So I see no way it can destroy the labour market other than rendering solutions to pressuring situations.

Artificial intelligence pose a huge risk to the labour market which ChatGPT is not an exception, in the coming future a lot of people are likely going to lose their jobs because of the presence of AI when most companies must have understood the benefits of using these tools, precisely the reduction in the cost of labour which means companies will spend lesser Money using this tools when compared to using human work force, however in as much as it pose some kind of risk to the labour market it has also come with some advantage too.

My personal opinion is that CHATGPT is a double-edged sword. First, artificial intelligence applications will directly replace corresponding labor positions. Second, the application of artificial intelligence can directly fill positions that workers cannot fill. Third, the application of artificial intelligence can create new jobs.

I think some jobs it will take away but it will be years before all the bugs and quirks are worked out. Right now you can’t completely rely on it without it being checked by a human.

Someone can find some bug and take advance and the company can lose money. There is risk for the company doing this. However eventually it will destroy jobs just like the Wendy’s drive thru attendants.

I remember before that we used to search on Google and spend countless hours finding bugs or solving a programming problem, which also took us days to solve. Now it will be solved in seconds. I think the fun and learning will be gone this time because if you just ask the AI to solve your assignment, let's say it solved it and you have high grades, but still, if you explain it in front of your classmates, for sure you can't explain it. Also, the fun will be gone because solving programming problems like simple things like making a pyramid on the console and having both of your classmates race against each other to see who can solve it first will be gone, as most of you are sure to search for them online.

No one will be able to completely destroy the job market, but if AI gets out of hand, it will have the impact of causing many people to lose their jobs. If chatbots or AI become too intelligent and many people intentionally create them to replace humans completely, that will be very bad for many people.

In general, technology is developed to bring benefits and convenience to people, but if there is a part that abuses them excessively for profit, it is likely to cause harm to many others. Especially those with low knowledge will face many difficulties when competing with these intelligent machines.

I think somehow it is true that there are some jobs may become automated, it is unlikely that chatbots will completely destroy the job market. There are many jobs require human interaction, problem solving skills and also creativity that are difficult for chatbots to replace it. I think chatbots are designed to assist humans and not to replace them. Chatbots may change the job market but i think they will not completely destroy it instead they could help the people to make their work much easier.

Maybe it is. Thats why Elon wants it regulated and If China develops it further, its going to be one hell of a manless manufacturer.

So far there are graphics made by AIs, they are much sophisticated and was done quickly than a graphic artist, thats one job down and accounting is easy for computers already adding AI will completely make accountants useless all they need is just the signature.

With AI having more information, the more it can do complex jobs. A programming student spends countless hours to code a project but asking AI to do it for him will only take few munites. AI integrated to Social media will make it easier for influencers. A team of Marketers may have to compete a tireless machine with complete weapons.

ChatGPT can be used to improve the quality of your job while you have it, then maybe you can shift your career into something related to AI maintenance and management and you will be fine. There's no doubt that AI breakthroughs will surely render a lot of jobs operated by humans 'useless', but at least while you're at it you can make your life easier while also trying to learn other industries to which you can transfer when all of this development about AI is said and done.

At the current state of ChatGPT, it's not a threat, but rather more of a tool that can help current jobs.

Dont be a luddite, in short the answer is No and also short term your ideas of jobs being replaced could appear true; its deceptive.  Overall the effect of any positive efficient technology is to create wealth for society, people are far superior to robots, to computers, software, hardware or this idea of AI the people will prove the more valuable and be paid far better then the AI will for sure.
  This is a tool, I hope a good one and its not one we should destroy because we want to plow the fields manually.  Every approach can have its advantages its clear technology should be about speeding up a process and enabling anyone not just tech heads to perform a task easily.   This was true when windows 1.0 came out, easily observable much as I saw windows as inferior to DOS back then in time its proved invaluable though imperfect to most.

Its quite progressive imo, just a stepping stone and a wobbly one at that hardly perfect or especially autonomously independent that I've seen.   AI has been waiting a long time to do much more impressive then win Chess games, this is all over due really; society's use of tech is behind the curve imo  I fear that more.   Supposedly Tesla is the number one leader in AI and its most profitable usage, I dont know we close to proving that utility is here.


AI was mentioned recently for use on automated helpdesk responses, jobs were being reduced in favor of technology deployment to customer enqueries.  I think we'd all prefer the human but that grey area of basic information handling is already here to some extent

Im quite agree to the freelance market but not for the programming. ChatGPT can be requested to create art as per your request but it's very help for programming to get the code instantly from the programmers. I were actively using ChatGPT for the programming and it's really help full. Building the code becomes even more easier use chatGPT and this is not even a threat for the programmers since charGPT being made by the programmers.


Anything related to the essay or something else. it can be done in seconds or minutes through it. that's make people become so lazy.


Only some elements in the freelance market that will be disrupted by this but i think that it will not be so significant.

At the current status of chatgpt, it won't give any threat to the job market.  One of the reasons is that the chatgpt still needs a lot of improvement.  They still show lots of error and inconsistency.  I believe they are still in the experimental stage and is yet from perfection.  And even if the chatgpt is perfected, it still needs human assistance to function well and do its intended task.  I think we still need decades before AI will become a threat for job hunters.

We should really realize that if there's a benefit then there's also its con's which we know that once things to be already that automated or something that been influenced or applied with AI then for sure

manpower wouldnt really be needed much more. On the time that it progresses where jobs could be potentially be replaced with AI would definitely be imposing such problem or trouble into those people
who are really having those jobs. Yes, AI could really be applied into those jobs or tasks which could really be simply automated which means that these positions would be eradicated and would really be replaced by something more organized and faster and more convenient approach via applying AI on which certain companies would definitely be having that consideration rather than on
hiring some employees.

This is actually one of the cons or risks when AI do progress even more where certain jobs would really be replaced out and lots of people would really be mainly affected.

Many will get affected on it once chatgpt will fully develop nor will get good upgrades where it knows almost everything which you can do. For sure internet services related job will be affected on it since instead clients will get some people to work with them they will just get the service of AI which they can save money and work force.

But there are some areas still need.human interaction so I believe that not all jobs will be affected on this AI thing. To avoid losing a lot of job maybe its good for government to step up and set some law to ban using this kind of technology so that job market will not get affected by AI.

I'm not sure if Chatgpt can really help eliminate or reduce employment in each country. Because every year that passes around the world the number of unemployed is increasing because every year we all know that many people graduate from college.

       And even among those who did not graduate, there are also more job seekers. Although there is no doubt that currently chatgpt is useful for other things regarding things we don't know that we can ask here and it will give us options to answer our questions.