Are you people for real? If it makes a job easier and increases productivity, then obviously fewer people are needed to produce the same output - meaning they could be made redundant.
On top of that, if AI is sufficiently good at something, then no humans could actually be needed at all. i.e. if I can use AI to produce the exact graphic or content that I need, with just few prompts, I will no longer be using any graphic designers or copywriters. Even if they were to reduce their payment expectations massively, they'd still won' be able to compete as AI is essentially free and can produce much faster.
So the real question is, if a new type of jobs will emerge, that can be done by humans but not AI. That was historically true with any automation, but I think most experts agree that it's just a matter of time before most of human work will become obsolete. That's pretty obvious to understand if we look at people as biological robots, that are not optimised for any kind of work, i.e. we use much more energy that is needed for the tasks that we're doing.
And it's funny (and a bit disturbing) that AI seems to be replacing "creative" jobs, so jobs that some believed will be automated as last, or that will never be automated at all.