Pages:
Author

Topic: Will Russia Emerge As The Next Dominant Superpower - page 9. (Read 8917 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Hahaha! That's a funny quote. But I'm only speaking out of what I've read from history books. Perhaps in times of peace, being of friend of the the United Stares is fatal, but in times of war, it's a friend that you truly need. Those countries have always helped each other during times of war, and I don't believe that will change.

That's even more true in times of war. Take World War 2 for example, the Americans didn't even get involved in it for the first 3 years, and only came in until the Axis showed both capability and will to attack US mainland.

Even during these days where 3 wars are going on (energy, food and the armed conflict in Ukraine) US is seeking its own benefits and is using EU (the "friends") instead of helping them. They sometimes even use them as cannon fodder like Australia and Taiwan against China, South Korean against North Korea, etc.


It's probably because the United States of America was also worried about another "Empire" from the East, Japan, which was also having its own expansion of its war in Asia which also included China. We can't point fingers why they were late  in entering World War II, but the probability is high that the war would have taken longer than 6 or 7 years without the Americans. Or it might also have given the Axis Forces a better probability to win.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1176
So better mind your own business - each country official should care for their people and stop worrying about other people - that is one way to save their face.

It is easy to say so, but it is impossible to achieve such thing. As you have noticed, countries around the world are not identical. Neither their natural resources are either. Everything is imbalanced and some countries are in better positions than others. This causes unions (trading and political) between countries to appear. And from that we all have obligations towards others and a must "to worry about other people".
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 10537
Two countries partnering up right now to bring the war in Us soil just near Alaska. Its China and Russia where their ships are already very close to US, doing military exercises. Why do you think they are challenging US right now?
China already declared war on US as a retaliation for Opium Wars that ruined their country many years ago in form of a new Opium War where US is the target this time.
The amount of fentanyl China is shipping towards United States to be used by drug cartels has increased significantly while the drug-abuse crisis in US is getting worse.
hero member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 595
https://www.betcoin.ag
I think it is too early to say who will emerge as the dominant superpower. The future is a broad concept, so we'll have to see if this actually happens or not. What is important now?? is how to get out of the current economic and financial crisis.
I agree and it's better to think about getting out of the current economic crisis first,
that's much more important and surely it's also not something easy,
I hope that the economic conditions will improve in the near future even though it is actually difficult

Two countries partnering up right now to bring the war in Us soil just near Alaska. Its China and Russia where their ships are already very close to US, doing military exercises. Why do you think they are challenging US right now?

US had always been creating conflict and wars to countries far away from them, so the two wanna find out what US would do if the war happens on their soil. You can tell us whether China and Russia are not dominant superpower with what they are doing.
full member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 180
Chainjoes.com
You hear, you are a stupid fascist, Ukraine will be, do not doubt it, and the Kuban will be Ukrainian territory, but you will no longer be, you are on the black list. Grin

LOL.. I should be really frightened now since I am on the blacklist.  Grin

I asked some legitimate questions and you resorted to name calling, since you don't have any valid answer. How is conquering Kuban any different from Russia's current invasion of Ukraine? And at least in Russia's case they can claim that the vast majority of the population in regions they have annexed till now are Russian-speaking. The same is not true with Kuban. Less than 0.1% of the population there speak Ukrainian. And obviously everyone will be a fascist if they disagree with what you are saying. ROFL.
When in Russia, due to a military defeat in Ukraine, everything becomes very bad and the country will fall apart into separate "republics", in the Kuban they may remember that they are the descendants of the Ukrainian Zaporizhzhya Cossacks, who moved to the Kuban after the Zaporozhian Sich on the orders of Catherine II was defeated by the troops of Suvorov, who was returning from the Italian campaign. Therefore, it is quite possible that the Kuban itself will ask to become part of Ukraine and for this they will remember the Ukrainian language, otherwise Ukraine simply will not take them. Believe that after that the majority in Kuban will speak Ukrainian.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 101
I think it is too early to say who will emerge as the dominant superpower. The future is a broad concept, so we'll have to see if this actually happens or not. What is important now?? is how to get out of the current economic and financial crisis.
I agree and it's better to think about getting out of the current economic crisis first,
that's much more important and surely it's also not something easy,
I hope that the economic conditions will improve in the near future even though it is actually difficult
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 215
#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE
I think it is too early to say who will emerge as the dominant superpower. The future is a broad concept, so we'll have to see if this actually happens or not. What is important now?? is how to get out of the current economic and financial crisis.
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 10537
Hahaha! That's a funny quote. But I'm only speaking out of what I've read from history books. Perhaps in times of peace, being of friend of the the United Stares is fatal, but in times of war, it's a friend that you truly need. Those countries have always helped each other during times of war, and I don't believe that will change.
That's even more true in times of war. Take World War 2 for example, the Americans didn't even get involved in it for the first 3 years, and only came in until the Axis showed both capability and will to attack US mainland.
Even during these days where 3 wars are going on (energy, food and the armed conflict in Ukraine) US is seeking its own benefits and is using EU (the "friends") instead of helping them. They sometimes even use them as cannon fodder like Australia and Taiwan against China, South Korean against North Korea, etc.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
You hear, you are a stupid fascist, Ukraine will be, do not doubt it, and the Kuban will be Ukrainian territory, but you will no longer be, you are on the black list. Grin

LOL.. I should be really frightened now since I am on the blacklist.  Grin

I asked some legitimate questions and you resorted to name calling, since you don't have any valid answer. How is conquering Kuban any different from Russia's current invasion of Ukraine? And at least in Russia's case they can claim that the vast majority of the population in regions they have annexed till now are Russian-speaking. The same is not true with Kuban. Less than 0.1% of the population there speak Ukrainian. And obviously everyone will be a fascist if they disagree with what you are saying. ROFL.
You stupid hindu, the Kuban was the territory of Ukraine, and there for a long time, until the russians eradicated it, they spoke Ukrainian and wore embroidered shirts, such a national shirt.
The film "Cтpяпyxa", the 60s, it all is shown there. https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/44014/
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Do you, or the Russian people in general, consider China to be a "good ally", or is China a "dangerous ally"?
China (and Russia for that matter) is a bad ally. It's just that for the past couple of years such alliances are based on "enemy of my enemy is my friend" kind of situation. Besides, these alliances (unlike the alliances in the west) are based on mutual benefits not unilateral ones.

Because for Great Britain, they know that the United States is their "good ally"/almost brothers as history illustrates
These days things like this remind me of a famous quote from Kissinger:
"To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."


Hahaha! That's a funny quote. But I'm only speaking out of what I've read from history books. Perhaps in times of peace, being of friend of the the United Stares is fatal, but in times of war, it's a friend that you truly need. Those countries have always helped each other during times of war, and I don't believe that will change.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
My opinion is that China is a dangerous ally. The Chinese practically do not assimilate with the local population (just one day a Chinatown appears in your city) and China has quite definite views on the dominant role of the Celestial Empire in the world. Plus, for historical reasons, China considers the Russian Far East its territory (it passed to Russia for helping China during the opium wars). China is a very dangerous ally. And at the same time, his danger and strength make him a good ally for Russia (because what is the use of a weak ally at all?). Now Russia and China do not look at each other, but rather stand back to back.

There is an agreement on the border between China and Russia, which was signed back in 1999. As per the agreement, China has recognized these territories as part of Russia. China may be a tough negotiator, but I don't think that they are someone who can be considered as untrustworthy. At least when compared to Turkey, China seems to be a good ally. Turkey on the other hand has handed over military equipment to Ukraine and invaded Nagorno Karabakh, despite benefitting from cheap Russian pipeline gas.
copper member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 900
White Russian
Do you, or the Russian people in general, consider China to be a "good ally", or is China a "dangerous ally"?
China (and Russia for that matter) is a bad ally. It's just that for the past couple of years such alliances are based on "enemy of my enemy is my friend" kind of situation. Besides, these alliances (unlike the alliances in the west) are based on mutual benefits not unilateral ones.
As Alexander III seems to have said, Russia has only two allies - its army and navy. All strategic and tactical foreign policy alliances with Russia are possible only if the cooperation is mutually beneficial.
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 10537
Do you, or the Russian people in general, consider China to be a "good ally", or is China a "dangerous ally"?
China (and Russia for that matter) is a bad ally. It's just that for the past couple of years such alliances are based on "enemy of my enemy is my friend" kind of situation. Besides, these alliances (unlike the alliances in the west) are based on mutual benefits not unilateral ones.

Because for Great Britain, they know that the United States is their "good ally"/almost brothers as history illustrates
These days things like this remind me of a famous quote from Kissinger:
"To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
copper member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 900
White Russian
I'm curious about something, and this was posted/asked in the forum by someone before. Do you, or the Russian people in general, consider China to be a "good ally", or is China a "dangerous ally"? Because for Great Britain, they know that the United States is their "good ally"/almost brothers as history illustrates, they fought together during World War I and World War II. I believe their alliance won't change if there's World War III.
My opinion is that China is a dangerous ally. The Chinese practically do not assimilate with the local population (just one day a Chinatown appears in your city) and China has quite definite views on the dominant role of the Celestial Empire in the world. Plus, for historical reasons, China considers the Russian Far East its territory (it passed to Russia for helping China during the opium wars). China is a very dangerous ally. And at the same time, his danger and strength make him a good ally for Russia (because what is the use of a weak ally at all?). Now Russia and China do not look at each other, but rather stand back to back.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
That's how Russia might lose in my opinion. Plus if an open conflict/war starts across Europe, Russia will have problems getting advanced parts for their miltiary equipment, as I have already posted. Will China help them, and risk sanctions too? We will never know, but knowing China, it will just watch the battle between two great armies and wait for their own opportunity after their exhaustion.
I mean that most of the mobilized people prefer to buy themselves a couple of sets of thermal underwear, earplugs and diarrhea pills, as well as comfortable winter shoes, not relying too much on regular army uniforms. Of course, each motorized rifleman will be given a helmet, bulletproof vest and a Kalashnikov assault rifle, as well as the statutory camouflage uniform and shoes. But there are things that make staying in the field more comfortable, and each mobilized person usually takes care of this himself, if it is important for him. Someone even takes tactical glasses, active headphones, a thermal imager and a quadcopter with them, but these are already the most stubborn survivalists. On average, the minimum set of uniforms costs each mobilized 500-1000 dollars.


OK, I understand.

I'm curious about something, and this was posted/asked in the forum by someone before. Do you, or the Russian people in general, consider China to be a "good ally", or is China a "dangerous ally"? Because for Great Britain, they know that the United States is their "good ally"/almost brothers as history illustrates, they fought together during World War I and World War II. I believe their alliance won't change if there's World War III.
copper member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 900
White Russian
Any idea on the total number that will be mobilized? I have heard about conflicting numbers, ranging from 300,000 to one million. Given that there are around 200,000 on the frontline right now (including militia from DNR/LNR and PMC Wagner), the lower range will raise the total number of Russian soldiers to 500,000. This still gives the Ukrainians a numerical superiority of 2 to 1. If one million reservists are drafted, then Russia will have the numerical advantage. Given that the frontline is around 1,000 km long the lower range would give a soldier for every 4 meters (given that 50% will actually be deployed in the front).
This is a tricky question, given that officials in Russia have dismissed all rumors about the extent of the partial mobilization. Personally, my opinion is that the current stage of mobilization is a trial one in order to check in practice the state of the mobilization system in Russia. And I think that the matter will not be limited to 300 thousand reservists, there will be at least 1-2 more waves of mobilization. In theory, you need to call a million people under arms in order to confidently deprive Ukraine of its only advantage in manpower.

ps Another thing is that tomorrow four new regions may join Russia based on the results of referendums. And generally speaking, this will untie the hands of Putin to use the soldiers who are serving in the Russian Army in these territories. Therefore, additional mobilization may not be necessary.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I mean that most of the mobilized people prefer to buy themselves a couple of sets of thermal underwear, earplugs and diarrhea pills, as well as comfortable winter shoes, not relying too much on regular army uniforms. Of course, each motorized rifleman will be given a helmet, bulletproof vest and a Kalashnikov assault rifle, as well as the statutory camouflage uniform and shoes. But there are things that make staying in the field more comfortable, and each mobilized person usually takes care of this himself, if it is important for him. Someone even takes tactical glasses, active headphones, a thermal imager and a quadcopter with them, but these are already the most stubborn survivalists. On average, the minimum set of uniforms costs each mobilized 500-1000 dollars.

Any idea on the total number that will be mobilized? I have heard about conflicting numbers, ranging from 300,000 to one million. Given that there are around 200,000 on the frontline right now (including militia from DNR/LNR and PMC Wagner), the lower range will raise the total number of Russian soldiers to 500,000. This still gives the Ukrainians a numerical superiority of 2 to 1. If one million reservists are drafted, then Russia will have the numerical advantage. Given that the frontline is around 1,000 km long the lower range would give a soldier for every 4 meters (given that 50% will actually be deployed in the front).
copper member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 900
White Russian
That's how Russia might lose in my opinion. Plus if an open conflict/war starts across Europe, Russia will have problems getting advanced parts for their miltiary equipment, as I have already posted. Will China help them, and risk sanctions too? We will never know, but knowing China, it will just watch the battle between two great armies and wait for their own opportunity after their exhaustion.
I mean that most of the mobilized people prefer to buy themselves a couple of sets of thermal underwear, earplugs and diarrhea pills, as well as comfortable winter shoes, not relying too much on regular army uniforms. Of course, each motorized rifleman will be given a helmet, bulletproof vest and a Kalashnikov assault rifle, as well as the statutory camouflage uniform and shoes. But there are things that make staying in the field more comfortable, and each mobilized person usually takes care of this himself, if it is important for him. Someone even takes tactical glasses, active headphones, a thermal imager and a quadcopter with them, but these are already the most stubborn survivalists. On average, the minimum set of uniforms costs each mobilized 500-1000 dollars.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
For be.open, and all the people who are currently living inside Russia.

Is the protests against the Russian government's decision for mobilisation true? Is it growing in support? Or is it merely another form of propaganda for the people outside of Russia to believe that something "important" is actually happening?

I can see just one person in the picture, with any protests in the background. Plus she looks "too beautiful" with make up?

There are no mass protests in my small town in the Urals. Every day a new bus leaves the city with mobilized 10-15 people. Based on the dynamics of mobilization, I can assume that much more will be mobilized than the 300 thousand people announced by Putin.


What about in the big cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg, and what about in the news, and what's mood of the news? Plus I will not ask what's your personal opinion about the mobilisation, but what are your neighbors' or your friends' opinions on the mobilisation? Are they in a "patriotic mood" and support the possbility of an expansion of the war, or are they cycnical and in doubt?

OR, if majority of the people are in protest, will it matter?
Two of my friend's acquaintances emigrated after the announcement of mobilization - one to Georgia, the other to Kazakhstan. I think this is the only reasonable protest option for the people of Russia, voting with their feet.

Basically, the protests are not against the fact of mobilization, but against the mess in its implementation, which is also enough. By the way, these protests are quite effective, if it turns out that the mobilized is more useful in the rear, they leave him alone. The mobilized themselves, I think, are not happy. Adults are pulled out of normal life and sent to the war zone, where they may have to spend the winter in the field. Basically, people buy themselves a first-aid kit and warm clothes, not really relying on army supplies.


That's how Russia might lose in my opinion. Plus if an open conflict/war starts across Europe, Russia will have problems getting advanced parts for their miltiary equipment, as I have already posted. Will China help them, and risk sanctions too? We will never know, but knowing China, it will just watch the battle between two great armies and wait for their own opportunity after their exhaustion.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You hear, you are a stupid fascist, Ukraine will be, do not doubt it, and the Kuban will be Ukrainian territory, but you will no longer be, you are on the black list. Grin

LOL.. I should be really frightened now since I am on the blacklist.  Grin

I asked some legitimate questions and you resorted to name calling, since you don't have any valid answer. How is conquering Kuban any different from Russia's current invasion of Ukraine? And at least in Russia's case they can claim that the vast majority of the population in regions they have annexed till now are Russian-speaking. The same is not true with Kuban. Less than 0.1% of the population there speak Ukrainian. And obviously everyone will be a fascist if they disagree with what you are saying. ROFL.
Pages:
Jump to: