Pages:
Author

Topic: ♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 53. (Read 30087 times)

legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1140

maybe if I may suggest, what if there are many choices of coins whose prices are still cheap such as XLM, TRX, XRP and others.  because I think for beginner gambling players only have a little capital, it is better if added to the coin that I mentioned earlier in order to facilitate the deposit of novice gamblers.  besides that the coin that I mentioned earlier also has a cheap withdrawal fee.  This is only a suggestion, the policy in your hands.
All things would have their own time  Wink

Currently they do already had  BTC,ETH,LTC,DOG & BCH. They are targeting most common coins that majority uses.When we do talk about
small price or cheap ones then DOGE would already be enough for that.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
maybe if I may suggest, what if there are many choices of coins whose prices are still cheap such as XLM, TRX, XRP and others.  because I think for beginner gambling players only have a little capital, it is better if added to the coin that I mentioned earlier in order to facilitate the deposit of novice gamblers.  besides that the coin that I mentioned earlier also has a cheap withdrawal fee.  This is only a suggestion, the policy in your hands.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1102
With wagering low amounts you are expected to lose 1% of the total amount you wager.
If you bet 100 Satoshi 100,000 times, there is no difference the multiplier is 1.1 or 100.

There is a difference for sure. In how long you can last, and how many wagers you can accumulate. So the difference is not in the expected loss amounts,,, but in the expected number of rolls before you lose that amount.

If you bet 100 satoshi at 100, you will expect to lose it 99 times out of 100 (roughly). So if you only have 1000 satoshi you can bet ten times and very high chance to lose it all without winning.

But if you bet at 1.1 you can expect to last 10 rolls and win once,,, Get it?
That is only makes you gamble longer, it doesn't really change the outcome as much. Sure, if you are working towards the competition that means gambling as much as possible is the important part and betting on 100 is bad idea because you would lose quickly and betting on 1.1 is a good idea because you can gamble longer.

However if you want to "win" both will end up in the same result which is losing all your money eventually even if it takes a quick second or a year, it all leads to loss. Contests like these are just making trying to figure out methods how they could gamble as much as possible and not lose too much money, at least not more than the reward the contest is giving, that is not bad for the casino but eventually how could you expect not to lose.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1107
No hard feels. Ripple and XRP are actually not the same thing but belong to the same CEO. However, the last time I checked most crypto gambling site barely accept XRP due to its status in the market and I believe gambling add coin base on their user opinion with the coin level of profitable in the market.
Weldone Windice for adding more coin.

I agree to disagree - most of the top sites have support for XRP
it happened to be the newest coin added on Stake and it is extremely popular among the HR bettors
at least a decent amount of highrollers bets are made in ripple , you can see for yourself
Bitsler added XRP long time ago and other sites have support too , namely cryptogames and duckdice , from the top of my head
every new coin added means new gamblers and , potentially , new whales , playing
this is why some sites introduce relatively unknown and not so popular coins , simply because there are not many places yet  that accept it and there is a high chance a whale or a miner starts to play and brings profit to the casino
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me

cool! BCH support is added by windice!
not a huge fan of Bitcoin cash in general , but it is pretty popular among gamblers it seems
I say the more the merrier , the more coins a site supports , the more players and more volume it has
maybe add Ripple or Dash support next , probably the next two popular altcoins ( if it can be said about crappy centralized ripple , but meh)

No hard feels. Ripple and XRP are actually not the same thing but belong to the same CEO. However, the last time I checked most crypto gambling site barely accept XRP due to its status in the market and I believe gambling add coin base on their user opinion with the coin level of profitable in the market.
Weldone Windice for adding more coin.
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 104
Great, two news for this day. Although I'm not a fan of BCH and don't like it but the more support for different altcoins is good for the platform.

And here we go, 220M bets as another achievement for windice.

@livingfree it’s surprised me also that they have added support for BCH, was there any demand from their existing user base for adding BCH?. Congratulations Windice that’s a huge milestone, and it seems each time I visit this ANN I’m greeted by a new milestone achieved by the Windice team.
I guess there is.

They wouldn't add a coin if there's no demand for it. And another thing is that there's a lot of casinos that has added BCH on their support. Meanwhile, as we don't think that there's a huge usage of it and we don't use it, they won't decide about it if it's not useful on their end.

Yup that it right maybe the demand for BCH user are a lot because I see most online casino offer a BCH on their site, this is also a good promotion to attract morr player specially those player that want to ise BCH as their fund.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 580
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Great, two news for this day. Although I'm not a fan of BCH and don't like it but the more support for different altcoins is good for the platform.

And here we go, 220M bets as another achievement for windice.

@livingfree it’s surprised me also that they have added support for BCH, was there any demand from their existing user base for adding BCH?. Congratulations Windice that’s a huge milestone, and it seems each time I visit this ANN I’m greeted by a new milestone achieved by the Windice team.
I guess there is.

They wouldn't add a coin if there's no demand for it. And another thing is that there's a lot of casinos that has added BCH on their support. Meanwhile, as we don't think that there's a huge usage of it and we don't use it, they won't decide about it if it's not useful on their end.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1140
Great, two news for this day. Although I'm not a fan of BCH and don't like it but the more support for different altcoins is good for the platform.

And here we go, 220M bets as another achievement for windice.

@livingfree it’s surprised me also that they have added support for BCH, was there any demand from their existing user base for adding BCH?. Congratulations Windice that’s a huge milestone, and it seems each time I visit this ANN I’m greeted by a new milestone achieved by the Windice team.
In demand or  not, adding up more crypto deposit options is still a good one yet this will extent out for people to deposit in multiple coins.
This isnt something new yet majority of top gambling sites nowadays already done this stuff so its no surprise that this would be just like a
normal or typical feature for a site to have.
hero member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
With wagering low amounts you are expected to lose 1% of the total amount you wager.
If you bet 100 Satoshi 100,000 times, there is no difference the multiplier is 1.1 or 100.

There is a difference for sure. In how long you can last, and how many wagers you can accumulate. So the difference is not in the expected loss amounts,,, but in the expected number of rolls before you lose that amount.

If you bet 100 satoshi at 100, you will expect to lose it 99 times out of 100 (roughly). So if you only have 1000 satoshi you can bet ten times and very high chance to lose it all without winning.

But if you bet at 1.1 you can expect to last 10 rolls and win once,,, Get it?
hero member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 511
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
was there any demand from their existing user base for adding BCH?.
I'm not user BitcoinCash(BCH). But i trade on it sometimes, just take a part in best moment. So far I did spend BCH to casino from rewards of hardforks xD. Based Rank on CMC, they have big demand trade(Volume), which mean probably those people using BCH for trade,spend, and gambling.
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Great, two news for this day. Although I'm not a fan of BCH and don't like it but the more support for different altcoins is good for the platform.

And here we go, 220M bets as another achievement for windice.

@livingfree it’s surprised me also that they have added support for BCH, was there any demand from their existing user base for adding BCH?. Congratulations Windice that’s a huge milestone, and it seems each time I visit this ANN I’m greeted by a new milestone achieved by the Windice team.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 580
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Great, two news for this day. Although I'm not a fan of BCH and don't like it but the more support for different altcoins is good for the platform.

And here we go, 220M bets as another achievement for windice.
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 236

Its good achievement by you and your team in very less time congrats from me keep up this I love to be on site every day.
copper member
Activity: 425
Merit: 5
🎲 windice.io ❤️
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1107

cool! BCH support is added by windice!
not a huge fan of Bitcoin cash in general , but it is pretty popular among gamblers it seems
I say the more the merrier , the more coins a site supports , the more players and more volume it has
maybe add Ripple or Dash support next , probably the next two popular altcoins ( if it can be said about crappy centralized ripple , but meh)
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1017
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
So, I still think betting small on high odds of winning is a better strategy because even if you lose you lose small amount and there is a chance of hitting 100 in a row wins (even if you lose once or twice its small amount) and that ends up with high wagered amount.
With wagering low amounts you are expected to lose 1% of the total amount you wager.
If you bet 100 Satoshi 100,000 times, there is no difference the multiplier is 1.1 or 100.
However the strategy will not work eventually we will also lose money. Because when betting a low amount with a high chance, the profit obtained is only slightly not proportional to the number of wagers you make. When you lose a bet will recover if you have for example 10 wins but what if in 10 times there are several bets that lose would be difficult to recover and even get profit.
copper member
Activity: 425
Merit: 5
🎲 windice.io ❤️
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
So, I still think betting small on high odds of winning is a better strategy because even if you lose you lose small amount and there is a chance of hitting 100 in a row wins (even if you lose once or twice its small amount) and that ends up with high wagered amount.
With wagering low amounts you are expected to lose 1% of the total amount you wager.
If you bet 100 Satoshi 100,000 times, there is no difference the multiplier is 1.1 or 100.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1102
For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

Agree,,, but this depends on your balance. To build a wager for first few levels, I would say at least 0,05 BTC is necessary to last 1 million bets at x2 payout on starting bet 1 satoshi, but if you have much much less, I would even go for just small bets like 100 satoshi at max chance, and then no increase on loss.

OR my personal favorite is to x2 martingale till maybe 1000 profit, then use 100 on max chance until bust. Repeat again and again.
Martingale or any other strategy is at the end all depends on the luck of the player. I once had a streak of 11 wins, considering it was martingale my win wasn't as considerable as it could be yet when I had 7 in a row loss (less than 11 streak) I lost all my money. So, at the end as you can see martingale has a very slim margin of unlucky streaks, if you end up at the red too many times in a row then you may end up with nothing and winning the contest wouldn't help you recover 10% of that most of the time.

So, I still think betting small on high odds of winning is a better strategy because even if you lose you lose small amount and there is a chance of hitting 100 in a row wins (even if you lose once or twice its small amount) and that ends up with high wagered amount.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 580
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
~ If you want to just gamble as much as possible my suggestion is to have enough funds and gamble with minimum allowed bet with 98%, you can still lose with that but at least you won't lose much.

You've just described the most boring way of gambling ever. I'm sure you'll agree with me after rereading what you were suggesting. )

Hehe, this strategy and percentage is good if you don't want to mess that much but knowing that there's a 2% chance of losing then why go for higher percentage with possible higher reward.

The risk is higher but it would be worth to try. Yeah, setting automatic @98% sort of boring.  Tongue
Pages:
Jump to: