I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.
Thanks for sharing that story! In my opinion there is no strategy which works in the long run. All of those strategies I ve seen (and used) only work for a very short time frame until a loss streak kicks in and erases your bank roll in no matter of time. Its clear why: If there would be a strategy which really works casinos wouldnt allow it to be used or would have software in place which detects such a strategy and ban you. 
Topic: ♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 55. (Read 29745 times)
November 04, 2019, 11:25:56 AM
November 04, 2019, 09:28:57 AM
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.
November 03, 2019, 12:25:41 PM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me 
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
A pretty good answer to Battareus' question was given by veleten here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52948963
What you say may be a cause of confusion for some people, and I'll explain why. Yes, bigger bankroll gives you a higher chance of winning a wagering contest if you follow the strategy described by veleten, but NO, you don't have a higher chance of winning in gambling in general playing with a higher bankroll. The chances of winning a big amount are higher with higher bets, that's true, but the chances of losing a big amount are higher as well, and we shouldn't forget about that.
November 03, 2019, 06:14:42 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
November 03, 2019, 06:03:59 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
November 03, 2019, 05:41:21 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
November 03, 2019, 12:25:56 AM
These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
Others or most don't believe on strategies that are being shared because it doesn't work out for everyone even if it was shared our luck is still a factor. They keep it to themselves because people would give doubts to their strategy. You don't need to spend much just to find which strategy works for you since most if not all bitcoin gambling sites have very small minimums on dice. 
November 02, 2019, 07:32:26 PM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
November 02, 2019, 04:48:42 PM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
November 02, 2019, 04:22:26 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
I believe most dice game strategies has been shared in this forum already. No matter whether we are going to wager for competition or not, the result will always depend on our luck. There is no secret at all and there is no strategies that guarantee small minus for high wagering amount, even if you are going to use the highest winning chance but there is still a chance that we may lose all balance before wagering big amount as you may get some losing streak many times if you are in a bad luck. Just use your own strategy, even if there is someone say that strategy A B or C works for them to wager as much as possible but it may not work on you.
November 01, 2019, 11:21:47 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
Does secret on gambling exist? No there's no such thing.You can make bets which do had the highest probability or chances of winning just for you to gain or increase up that wager volume of yours but doesnt mean it will be a completely safe haven for you to continue. One loss will really result into
a long cope-uping scenario.It doesnt matter if you do bet big or small, automate small amounts with high chances or make big bets on 2x multiplier. All does counts.
November 01, 2019, 10:12:48 AM
The prize the first winner won has a significant value. Assuming that this gambler has lost 1% of the wagering amount, he has won a big profit.
I expected much more wagering amount to be needed to win the first place. Because in the latest 3-day contest, the first winner had wagered 14 BTC. This was a 4-day contest and I expected even higher amounts.
It is really not that important because the top one is spending so much money to be the top one, rodolman has won before and he knows that if you want to beat the opponents then you need to not only gamble a lot but also you need to make sure the others are not close to you. I expected much more wagering amount to be needed to win the first place. Because in the latest 3-day contest, the first winner had wagered 14 BTC. This was a 4-day contest and I expected even higher amounts.
The difference being too close kinda means to me that others didn't really go for the top place, if rodolman wanted to we know he could make 10+ btc easily, he has done that before and he could do it again, he has that kinda cash, now he doesn't have to, nobody has to but if they want the first place that is kinda the requirement, so you either do it or you don't. If you leave it to gods at the last second then you need to accept the fact that you may not be the first one at this competition, we now have our third different winner in 5-6 competitions, good parity.
November 01, 2019, 10:08:28 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
Maybe that is called a strategy in playing automatic betting but I'm not sure if there are people who share the setup with other players. Or there could be people who use third-party bots with a precise setup. Your win depends on your luck literally it is difficult to beat the house.If they are successful on their strategy then why would they share it? for sure they will keep it in there hands since they don't want it to scattered since for sure the house will do an update and those strats will not work again. But I literally want to know if there are really guys who win by using a bot since as you said which I agree also the winning percentage is always base on your luck.
November 01, 2019, 09:56:31 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
there is no secret , you can use the most common strat - 98% winning chance
you can simply roll straight 10.000-100.000 satoshi and expect to lose around 1-2% of your bank eventually while wagering relatively high amounts
the problem is that you have to get a high initial bank and start early
or risk to get wiped when you get 2-3 consecutive reds in a row on a high base bet
November 01, 2019, 08:43:22 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
Maybe that is called a strategy in playing automatic betting but I'm not sure if there are people who share the setup with other players. Or there could be people who use third-party bots with a precise setup. Your win depends on your luck literally it is difficult to beat the house. November 01, 2019, 06:32:14 AM
Prizes, house edge, variance possibilities all lead to a drop or rise in EXPECTED RETURN. House edge never changes, my friend.
When you think about the house edge as "an advantage over the player" you are right, my friend 
. This was the same mistake I made when we discussed the house edge a few pages back. But that is only one side of the medal. A casino survives because the EXPECTED RETURN is higher than the amount they have to pay out. Imagine windice is constantly holding such contests, leading to the fact that they pay out the same amount they earn from their players. What happens to the house edge (in terms of expected return or "survivability" and even in "advantage over the player")? Right, it drops.
November 01, 2019, 05:44:08 AM
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me
November 01, 2019, 05:18:57 AM
Yeah, that was a close fight for them but still they're both winners but with different prizes.
Top 1 and 2 do only have minimal gaps and as expected to happen for last minute where the real
big bets pops out.
I believe windice knows and realizes about it very well and they should keep how they distribute the prize like what they have done so far.
Yes, they did. Expect that the next competitions will always be like this. Giving a place to a lot of players and the distribution of reward is decent and justifiable. 
November 01, 2019, 04:16:08 AM
Of course its statistics.
We discussed the dropping of the house edge a few pages back, here is the relevant quote of the discussion:
TL;DR: You have to calculate the amount won because of the prize pool back in which leads to a drop of the house edge.
House edge and statistics are definitely relevant, but again I insist that prize pool alone does NOT lead to a drop in the house edge.
Remember, guaranteed prize pool assumes also (again statistics here yes) that people will compete and wager to win the contest, but statistically speaking,,, MOST gamblers are not smart so will either be impatient or will fall victim to variance.
Prizes, house edge, variance possibilities all lead to a drop or rise in EXPECTED RETURN. House edge never changes, my friend.
November 01, 2019, 02:25:33 AM
The top two has got a very minimal difference on the wagered amount. The last minutes have given hard competence between the two. For the small difference what the second position taker missed is a big amount. There is 0.065 btc difference, a win is always appreciable. Expecting more such competitions to take place over the days to come.
The prize the first winner won has a significant value. Assuming that this gambler has lost 1% of the wagering amount, he has won a big profit.
I expected much more wagering amount to be needed to win the first place. Because in the latest 3-day contest, the first winner had wagered 14 BTC. This was a 4-day contest and I expected even higher amounts.
Well, 1% loss of the wagering amount doesn't matter because the first winner will have the most to gain from the prize. This became a pretty fierce contest for the first and second winners in the future, because of course they will compete with more wagering. And I hope Windice considers the prize for the first to third winners so that the prize doesn't far differ too much.
The prize distribution is fair enough already, if they change it to make it like what you hope (not differ to much between the first - third winner) then the competition wont be attractive because the competition to be the first wont be that tight because of the small difference prize. I believe windice knows and realizes about it very well and they should keep how they distribute the prize like what they have done so far.
Jump to: