Pages:
Author

Topic: ♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 55. (Read 29951 times)

legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1140
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.
It doesnt matter actually because any strategy can really be applied as long it would count into its total wagered amount because even if the gambler

doesnt mind too much on how much he do wager, he would still end up those statistics because the only common goal in mind is on how to last longer
while we do play neither you are aiming for the competition or not.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 579
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
Yeah, it's a 'secret' then why would they end up letting others know it? is that how they're too generous enough to give it up to others? and if someone tells that he has a working strategy, don't believe it and it wouldn't work in windice or any other dice site.

Unless someone shares his strategy but there would be a disclaimer that there's no guarantee on it.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.
Thanks for sharing that story! In my opinion there is no strategy which works in the long run. All of those strategies I ve seen (and used) only work for a very short time frame until a loss streak kicks in and erases your bank roll in no matter of time. Its clear why: If there would be a strategy which really works casinos wouldnt allow it to be used or would have software in place which detects such a strategy and ban you.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1102
Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

A pretty good answer to Battareus' question was given by veleten here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52948963

What you say may be a cause of confusion for some people, and I'll explain why. Yes, bigger bankroll gives you a higher chance of winning a wagering contest if you follow the strategy described by veleten, but NO, you don't have a higher chance of winning in gambling in general playing with a higher bankroll. The chances of winning a big amount are higher with higher bets, that's true, but the chances of losing a big amount are higher as well, and we shouldn't forget about that.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 104
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
There has been a lot of talk about a lot of possibilities of increasing the volume without losing too much but in the end whatever method you use its going to end up with 1% house edge possibility, all you can do is to make sure you lose that amount instead of too much.

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
Why do many users talk about high stakes, as if this greatly affects the results of the game?  When I use the minimum bets, with a multiplier of 2 and a chance of 50%, then I achieve very good success.  But if I start using a big bet, and change the settings, then I lose it anyway, even if the first rounds are successful.
hero member
Activity: 2730
Merit: 585
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
There has been a lot of talk about a lot of possibilities of increasing the volume without losing too much but in the end whatever method you use its going to end up with 1% house edge possibility, all you can do is to make sure you lose that amount instead of too much.

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.
full member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 133
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
You are absolutely right and that is why I never pay attention to any tips and examples of strategies, not only in gambling, but also in trading.  I’m just starting to understand gambling and have already realized one thing, that the main thing is to effectively use the capabilities of faucet, which provides a resource to get the first balance and understand how dice work.  Everything else is, first of all, luck, because I do not see another factor of influence on the result.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1922
Shuffle.com
These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
Others or most don't believe on strategies that are being shared because it doesn't work out for everyone even if it was shared our luck is still a factor. They keep it to themselves because people would give doubts to their strategy. You don't need to spend much just to find which strategy works for you since most if not all bitcoin gambling sites have very small minimums on dice.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1027
Dump it!!!
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 579
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed

I believe most dice game strategies has been shared in this forum already. No matter whether we are going to wager for competition or not, the result will always depend on our luck. There is no secret at all and there is no strategies that guarantee small minus for high wagering amount, even if you are going to use the highest winning chance but there is still a chance that we may lose all balance before wagering big amount as you may get some losing streak many times if you are in a bad luck. Just use your own strategy, even if there is someone say that strategy A B or C works for them to wager as much as possible but it may not work on you.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
Does secret on gambling exist? No there's no such thing.You can make bets which do had the highest probability or chances of winning just for you
to gain or increase up that wager volume of yours but doesnt mean it will be a completely safe haven for you to continue. One loss will really result into
a long cope-uping scenario.It doesnt matter if you do bet big or small, automate small amounts with high chances or make big bets on 2x multiplier. All does counts.
hero member
Activity: 2534
Merit: 605
The prize the first winner won has a significant value. Assuming that this gambler has lost 1% of the wagering amount, he has won a big profit.
I expected much more wagering amount to be needed to win the first place. Because in the latest 3-day contest, the first winner had wagered 14 BTC. This was a 4-day contest and I expected even higher amounts.
It is really not that important because the top one is spending so much money to be the top one, rodolman has won before and he knows that if you want to beat the opponents then you need to not only gamble a lot but also you need to make sure the others are not close to you.

The difference being too close kinda means to me that others didn't really go for the top place, if rodolman wanted to we know he could make 10+ btc easily, he has done that before and he could do it again, he has that kinda cash, now he doesn't have to, nobody has to but if they want the first place that is kinda the requirement, so you either do it or you don't. If you leave it to gods at the last second then you need to accept the fact that you may not be the first one at this competition, we now have our third different winner in 5-6 competitions, good parity.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 787
Jack of all trades 💯
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
Maybe that is called a strategy in playing automatic betting but I'm not sure if there are people who share the setup with other players. Or there could be people who use third-party bots with a precise setup. Your win depends on your luck literally it is difficult to beat the house.

If they are successful on their strategy then why would they share it? for sure they will keep it in there hands since they don't want it to scattered since for sure the house will do an update and those strats will not work again. But I literally want to know if there are really guys who win by using a bot since as you said which I agree also the winning percentage is always base on your luck.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1107
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed

there is no secret , you can use the most common strat - 98% winning chance
you can simply roll straight 10.000-100.000 satoshi and expect to lose around 1-2% of your bank eventually while wagering relatively high amounts
the problem is that you have to get a high initial bank and start early
or risk to get wiped when you get 2-3 consecutive reds in a row on a high base bet
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1017
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me Lips sealed
Maybe that is called a strategy in playing automatic betting but I'm not sure if there are people who share the setup with other players. Or there could be people who use third-party bots with a precise setup. Your win depends on your luck literally it is difficult to beat the house.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
Prizes, house edge, variance possibilities all lead to a drop or rise in EXPECTED RETURN. House edge never changes, my friend.
When you think about the house edge as "an advantage over the player" you are right, my friend Wink. This was the same mistake I made when we discussed the house edge a few pages back.
But that is only one side of the medal. A casino survives because the EXPECTED RETURN is higher than the amount they have to pay out. Imagine windice is constantly holding such contests, leading to the fact that they pay out the same amount they earn from their players. What happens to the house edge (in terms of expected return or "survivability" and even in "advantage over the player")? Right, it drops.
Pages:
Jump to: