♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 54.

dark08

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 104

Quote from: davinchi on November 07, 2019, 03:14:14 PM

Quote from: Betwrong on November 07, 2019, 03:56:21 AM

[im g]https://i.imgur.com/u21f4bQ.png[/img]

Look, I wagered 914 DOGE with 10 bets, while losing nothing, which was pretty much expected for playing with 98% win chance.

I think, you'll agree that if I were betting with 49.5% win chance, I would, most likely, lose at least 2 bets within 10. So my balance would decrease by 183 DOGE, (most likely), instead of being increased by 9 DOGE.

If you play with a very big balance, and make tens of thousands bets, it almost doesn't matter what strategy you are using. But for a balance that is just 10-20 times higher of your bet amount, betting with the highest win chance possible is definitely better than anything else, if your aim is to win a wagering contest.

The problem with that type of 98% win chance is that you need to win 100 times before you can lose, not 10. You can play 10 times in a row and not lose, that is a possibility but what if you gamble 200 times and lose 3 times? That would mean you lost money as much as a guy who played with 2x or even maybe more. That is why people are saying it doesn't matter what your strategy is, it all depends on your luck.

You can do any strategy you want, you can gamble however you want to gamble but at the end of the day if you are not lucky you are going to lose a lot of money and that is the end of the deal. If you want to just gamble as much as possible my suggestion is to have enough funds and gamble with minimum allowed bet with 98%, you can still lose with that but at least you won't lose much.

I agree to you everyone have their own strategy while playing dice game but if your not lucky you will end up losing your balance but for me I prefered a 80 to 85% win chances. I almost used a lot of strategy but in the end nothing is working lucky is the chance if you want to win profit.

davinchi

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1058

Quote from: Betwrong on November 07, 2019, 03:56:21 AM

[im g]https://i.imgur.com/u21f4bQ.png[/img]

Look, I wagered 914 DOGE with 10 bets, while losing nothing, which was pretty much expected for playing with 98% win chance.

I think, you'll agree that if I were betting with 49.5% win chance, I would, most likely, lose at least 2 bets within 10. So my balance would decrease by 183 DOGE, (most likely), instead of being increased by 9 DOGE.

If you play with a very big balance, and make tens of thousands bets, it almost doesn't matter what strategy you are using. But for a balance that is just 10-20 times higher of your bet amount, betting with the highest win chance possible is definitely better than anything else, if your aim is to win a wagering contest.

The problem with that type of 98% win chance is that you need to win 100 times before you can lose, not 10. You can play 10 times in a row and not lose, that is a possibility but what if you gamble 200 times and lose 3 times? That would mean you lost money as much as a guy who played with 2x or even maybe more. That is why people are saying it doesn't matter what your strategy is, it all depends on your luck.

You can do any strategy you want, you can gamble however you want to gamble but at the end of the day if you are not lucky you are going to lose a lot of money and that is the end of the deal. If you want to just gamble as much as possible my suggestion is to have enough funds and gamble with minimum allowed bet with 98%, you can still lose with that but at least you won't lose much.

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 07, 2019, 10:31:43 AM

Quote from: jostorres on November 07, 2019, 02:24:15 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

Does it matter or does it not matter also depends on the person. Some people want to gamble longer without losing too much, some people want to gamble to win money, so how you gamble depends on what you want from gambling. Some people want to just gamble and not care about competition, some people gamble just for competition, and some people gamble both to win and also be part of the competition at the same time.

Now, all of those people also have tens of different methods to approach what they are trying to achieve all of which combined makes for a big amount of ways to gamble. Hence at the end of the day only thing that matters is what you want to achieve with your gambling, if you are going for something specific then you need to do something specific as well.

You're right with what you said which why i advised the mixing of strategy (not mixing things) and avoiding the martingale strategy but the 98% strategy used by betwrong seems to be working seems fine at the moment though.

Its been proven out too that kind of strategy isnt really an assurance yet as said one loss would need lots of win for you to cope up but since
we are just concern with total wager then its not a big issue for you but if you are keen also on making profits while you are wagering then
you would really have that doubt on using it.Well, its a matter of choice or preference though even you do just simply bet on 2x multiplier having 1btc bankroll either win or loss
then its still a total wagered amount which would be hardly reach for those who had 98% winning rate with very minimal amounts.So its still had the difference.

leea-1334

hero member

Activity: 2296

Merit: 953

Temporary forum vacation

Quote from: bering on November 07, 2019, 02:33:01 AM

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

Agree,,, but this depends on your balance. To build a wager for first few levels, I would say at least 0,05 BTC is necessary to last 1 million bets at x2 payout on starting bet 1 satoshi, but if you have much much less, I would even go for just small bets like 100 satoshi at max chance, and then no increase on loss.

OR my personal favorite is to x2 martingale till maybe 1000 profit, then use 100 on max chance until bust. Repeat again and again.

Lakai01

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2721

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: panjul07 on November 07, 2019, 09:45:45 AM

Sorry to say but for me betting on high winning chance give me worst result when I participated on wagering contest compared when I use bigger payout like 1.2x up to 2x

What do you mean with "worst result on wagering contest" exactly? Wagering contests are all about how much money you wagered, not how much you won during the contest. So statistically you will ALWAYS (even if you are a damn unlucky person ;-) achieve better results when playing with very high win chances because your stake wont get melted as fast as it does when you play with eg. 49.9% win chance

suzanne5223

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 651

Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me

Quote from: jostorres on November 07, 2019, 02:24:15 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

Does it matter or does it not matter also depends on the person. Some people want to gamble longer without losing too much, some people want to gamble to win money, so how you gamble depends on what you want from gambling. Some people want to just gamble and not care about competition, some people gamble just for competition, and some people gamble both to win and also be part of the competition at the same time.

Now, all of those people also have tens of different methods to approach what they are trying to achieve all of which combined makes for a big amount of ways to gamble. Hence at the end of the day only thing that matters is what you want to achieve with your gambling, if you are going for something specific then you need to do something specific as well.

You're right with what you said which why i advised the mixing of strategy (not mixing things) and avoiding the martingale strategy but the 98% strategy used by betwrong seems to be working seems fine at the moment though.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: janggernaut on November 07, 2019, 09:25:20 AM

Quote from: panjul07 on November 07, 2019, 08:35:09 AM

I did it several times already, I did not even use the highest winning chance when I participated in a wagering contest.
Simply because I have tried using high winning chance but failed earlier because getting many losing bets.
Mathematically if we use high winning chance, then we need to have so many winning bets to recover 1 lose bet.
Obviously there is no guarantees that we will be able to wager more by using specific strategy as everything based on our luck.
It is just about preferences, every players has their own strategy and has their own luck.

So which is better between playing with low win chance or high win chance according your experience while joined on wagering contest? It must be playing on high win chance, isn't it?
Sure you can lose multiple times in a row while playing on high win chance, but the chance of that happened is much lower than lossing streak while you playing on 49.95% win chance or 2x payout, which can bring you more than 18 losses streaks.
People who using 2x payout is only aiming for profit because they are high roller (but sometimes they are the winner of wagering contest too)

Sorry to say but for me betting on high winning chance give me worst result when I participated on wagering contest compared when I use bigger payout like 1.2x up to 2x
Indeed betting on 2x can give us losing streak but it can give us winning streak as well. Once again it depends on our luck. Most of the time, I got good profit at the beginning so I decided to stop betting and forget the wagering contest.
Maybe you should try it and compare it yourself. No need to bet bigger but you can bet with the minimum bet (just for testing not for joining any contest).

janggernaut

legendary

Activity: 2366

Merit: 1130

Quote from: panjul07 on November 07, 2019, 08:35:09 AM

I did it several times already, I did not even use the highest winning chance when I participated in a wagering contest.
Simply because I have tried using high winning chance but failed earlier because getting many losing bets.
Mathematically if we use high winning chance, then we need to have so many winning bets to recover 1 lose bet.
Obviously there is no guarantees that we will be able to wager more by using specific strategy as everything based on our luck.
It is just about preferences, every players has their own strategy and has their own luck.

So which is better between playing with low win chance or high win chance according your experience while joined on wagering contest? It must be playing on high win chance, isn't it?
Sure you can lose multiple times in a row while playing on high win chance, but the chance of that happened is much lower than lossing streak while you playing on 49.95% win chance or 2x payout, which can bring you more than 18 losses streaks.
People who using 2x payout is only aiming for profit because they are high roller (but sometimes they are the winner of wagering contest too)

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: janggernaut on November 07, 2019, 08:00:46 AM

Quote from: bering on November 07, 2019, 02:33:01 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

I don't think i ever seen people betting on 2x payout while they are trying to win wagering contest. How could you so sure you can wager much more than on highest win chance? I believe 9 of 10 people who trying to win wager contest must be use high winning chance to avoid get lose streak while they betting.

I did it several times already, I did not even use the highest winning chance when I participated in a wagering contest.
Simply because I have tried using high winning chance but failed earlier because getting many losing bets.
Mathematically if we use high winning chance, then we need to have so many winning bets to recover 1 lose bet.
Obviously there is no guarantees that we will be able to wager more by using specific strategy as everything based on our luck.
It is just about preferences, every players has their own strategy and has their own luck.

janggernaut

legendary

Activity: 2366

Merit: 1130

Quote from: bering on November 07, 2019, 02:33:01 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

I don't think i ever seen people betting on 2x payout while they are trying to win wagering contest. How could you so sure you can wager much more than on highest win chance? I believe 9 of 10 people who trying to win wager contest must be use high winning chance to avoid get lose streak while they betting.

justdimin

hero member

Activity: 3122

Merit: 672

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

This place started like less than a year ago (about 6-8 months?) and they are already above 215 million right now with almost 90 pages on their bitcointalk topic. I feel like windice should be taught in marketing schools to kids on how to get the name out and how to make people talk about your brand.

How many places in all of crypto reached 90 pages and 215+ million bets in less than 8 months? Maybe stake did get a lot of attention when they first started but they were "casino of primedice" when they first started so that doesn't really count, aside from that I don't remember any other place that started this well.

I love this place too, they are one of the best casinos out there with most legit business owners out there, they have been running this like a proper business.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 2198

I stand with Ukraine.

Quote from: bering on November 07, 2019, 02:33:01 AM

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

I tried it, and it didn't work as good as playing with 98% win chance. I'll try to explain it with an example.

Look, I wagered 914 DOGE with 10 bets, while losing nothing, which was pretty much expected for playing with 98% win chance.

I think, you'll agree that if I were betting with 49.5% win chance, I would, most likely, lose at least 2 bets within 10. So my balance would decrease by 183 DOGE, (most likely), instead of being increased by 9 DOGE.

If you play with a very big balance, and make tens of thousands bets, it almost doesn't matter what strategy you are using. But for a balance that is just 10-20 times higher of your bet amount, betting with the highest win chance possible is definitely better than anything else, if your aim is to win a wagering contest.

bering

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1006

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes

jostorres

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 585

Quote from: dunfida on November 06, 2019, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

Does it matter or does it not matter also depends on the person. Some people want to gamble longer without losing too much, some people want to gamble to win money, so how you gamble depends on what you want from gambling. Some people want to just gamble and not care about competition, some people gamble just for competition, and some people gamble both to win and also be part of the competition at the same time.

Now, all of those people also have tens of different methods to approach what they are trying to achieve all of which combined makes for a big amount of ways to gamble. Hence at the end of the day only thing that matters is what you want to achieve with your gambling, if you are going for something specific then you need to do something specific as well.

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

Quote from: suzanne5223 on November 05, 2019, 09:34:37 AM

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

suzanne5223

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 651

Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me

Quote from: dunfida on November 05, 2019, 09:14:08 AM

Quote from: panjul07 on November 05, 2019, 03:54:09 AM

Quote from: Betwrong on November 05, 2019, 03:48:37 AM

Quote from: SquallLeonhart on November 04, 2019, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: redsun114 on November 03, 2019, 06:03:59 AM

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

It doesnt matter actually because any strategy can really be applied as long it would count into its total wagered amount because even if the gambler

doesnt mind too much on how much he do wager, he would still end up those statistics because the only common goal in mind is on how to last longer
while we do play neither you are aiming for the competition or not.

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

Quote from: panjul07 on November 05, 2019, 03:54:09 AM

Quote from: Betwrong on November 05, 2019, 03:48:37 AM

Quote from: SquallLeonhart on November 04, 2019, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: redsun114 on November 03, 2019, 06:03:59 AM

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

It doesnt matter actually because any strategy can really be applied as long it would count into its total wagered amount because even if the gambler

doesnt mind too much on how much he do wager, he would still end up those statistics because the only common goal in mind is on how to last longer
while we do play neither you are aiming for the competition or not.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: Betwrong on November 05, 2019, 03:48:37 AM

Quote from: SquallLeonhart on November 04, 2019, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: redsun114 on November 03, 2019, 06:03:59 AM

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 2198

I stand with Ukraine.

Quote from: SquallLeonhart on November 04, 2019, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: redsun114 on November 03, 2019, 06:03:59 AM

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

livingfree

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 579

Quote from: Zicadis on November 02, 2019, 07:32:26 PM

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs

Yeah, it's a 'secret' then why would they end up letting others know it? is that how they're too generous enough to give it up to others? and if someone tells that he has a working strategy, don't believe it and it wouldn't work in windice or any other dice site.

Unless someone shares his strategy but there would be a disclaimer that there's no guarantee on it.

Topic: ♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 54. (Read 29745 times)