Topic: 🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰 - page 34. (Read 51884 times)
It's Wednesday and time for another $5000 Wolf Race! Are you joining?
Have you seen our latest youtube video?
I just watched it now. There are 3 strategies from that video, first to hit 9000 profit on doges, 2nd and 3rd is trying to hit 1.3 btc. On first video, that user achieved the profit, but not in 2 and 3rd video, which he lose a lot of bitcoin because he chasing 100,000x multipler payout. Sometimes using autobet feature can make you rich instant and also can make you bankrupt so quick as well, it's not recommend for newbies IMO What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
I guess the only "down" side is that people may not want it. I get that the business world needs to become more legit and that's why they are doing stuff like this, there are other places that changed their system and doing it this way as well, there is really nothing that would be shocking if all places forced KYC from now on.Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
However when there are fiat gambling sportsbooks that I know which tries to find a way to not have any KYC at all, then the crypto ones do not make sense at all. You are literally sending money to some guys account in the fiat one, they could easily just rat you out or you could be found very easily, and you could be given a fine for that, whereas in crypto it is a lot easier to hide it. So the question remains, if the fiat ones are that brave, why the crypto ones are so eager to be "legit" when they can become even more illegal?
What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
It isn't a problem for you, but it will be a problem for many people including me who prefer staying anonymous on crypto gambling sites. I don't gamble on Roobet anymore primarily because of this issue.Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
The main advantage of crypto gambling sites is the ability to gamble anonymously. If this advantage disappears, this makes them far less appealing in my opinion.
I admit this has become your decision and after leaving roobet because the KYC system is not a big problem for you, including Wolfbet, I think they will try to be anonymous in the future.
What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
It isn't a problem for you, but it will be a problem for many people including me who prefer staying anonymous on crypto gambling sites. I don't gamble on Roobet anymore primarily because of this issue.Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
The main advantage of crypto gambling sites is the ability to gamble anonymously. If this advantage disappears, this makes them far less appealing in my opinion.
If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.
What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
But eventhough how good they if others don't feel to provide their details better they should stay out since gaining stress for worrying about this is totally not good.
Have you seen our latest youtube video?
If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.
What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.
I would like to tell everyone that support at wolf.bet is excellent as I recall an incident recently that happened with me. So basically I was betting and managed to win a good amount and even reach the VIP I think master level. Then as I went to the withdraw page but there I was asked to enable 2FA before I can withdraw and I thought like no problem let's do it.
Now once I went to the 2FA page, the image (QR code) was just not loading for me and I contacted live support and talked to him like a mad man because he was unable to understand what actually happened and I was a little frustrated. He remained polite and guided me to enter the code manually as it was given nearby the broken image. I even apologized to him later so it was all good, but a really nice memory for me which I wanted to share.
So really nice support but please fix the 2FA thing if not already
.
Now once I went to the 2FA page, the image (QR code) was just not loading for me and I contacted live support and talked to him like a mad man because he was unable to understand what actually happened and I was a little frustrated. He remained polite and guided me to enter the code manually as it was given nearby the broken image. I even apologized to him later so it was all good, but a really nice memory for me which I wanted to share.
So really nice support but please fix the 2FA thing if not already
. 
If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.
They won't become illegal just because they do not ask KYC, it is a crypto website, you can literally keep it as anon as it gets, nobody needs to know who you are and who owns the website and the worst thing any government can do would be to block access from their nation to wolf.bet and that's it.Plus, there are soooo many places that allow you to start headquarters and basically do anything illegal you want, there are literal mafia bosses that kill people who have headquarters stationed there, they never really go there but the hq is there for legal reasons, if a terrible person can do that, and if trillions of dollars was stolen from tax payers and sent to panama by corporations, I do not see how a casino could not just stay anon and be registered in some island off humanity somewhere and just not ask KYC. Obviously that is work and I understand why they may not do it, but it is not impossible neither.
the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.
So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something. So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.
This is a delicate issue, because on the one hand there is the legal basis of the casino and if the casino wants to grow it must comply with the regulations, the licenses give much more freedom for the casino to grow more, but the only restriction is that it falls within the theme of "KYC" And already that way many players leave, and it is understandable, nobody likes to leave their data, if the basis is all so that they can play with more freedom, and for that cryptocurrencies were also created.
The downside is that many see it as an obligation to comply with the KYC, but there will come a time when there will be no casinos that do not require KYC, and those that do not ask will not have the trust of authentic and reputable sites.
If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.
the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.
So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something. So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.
This is a delicate issue, because on the one hand there is the legal basis of the casino and if the casino wants to grow it must comply with the regulations, the licenses give much more freedom for the casino to grow more, but the only restriction is that it falls within the theme of "KYC" And already that way many players leave, and it is understandable, nobody likes to leave their data, if the basis is all so that they can play with more freedom, and for that cryptocurrencies were also created.
The downside is that many see it as an obligation to comply with the KYC, but there will come a time when there will be no casinos that do not require KYC, and those that do not ask will not have the trust of authentic and reputable sites.
the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.
So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something. So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.
I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.
I have not heard of any popular crypto gambling site that got closed down due to not enforcing mandatory KYC so far primarily because it's not that easy for authorities to screw them over.These sites smartly allow gamblers only from countries where these risks are minimal. For example, a scam site like 1xbit is still operating currently without any sort of mandatory KYC requirement.
The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
Actually, the correct answer for many is to include KYC in the TOS and only enforce it when they detect something shady or if a huge amount is being withdrawn.
Who's joining today?
the basic idea of crypto is that there is no attachment to central power, which decides everything in a community is a member of the community itself. Of course this is still a problem today, and KYC is not really a pleasant solution for some people. Especially gambling players.
That is the key point here, the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.
Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent
If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.
No, obviously for us players it is not feasible to always have to do KYC in order to have all the relevant benefits, I mean from the point of view of the platform, they are required to have clarity in all plays and deposits and Withdrawals, if a casino handles a considerable volume of crypto, this transforms to FIAT and it is a lot of money, I think that is where they want to cover their backs so that they do not get sanctioned or get into trouble, possible lawsuits among others.
I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.
the basic idea of crypto is that there is no attachment to central power, which decides everything in a community is a member of the community itself. Of course this is still a problem today, and KYC is not really a pleasant solution for some people. Especially gambling players.
Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent
If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.
No, obviously for us players it is not feasible to always have to do KYC in order to have all the relevant benefits, I mean from the point of view of the platform, they are required to have clarity in all plays and deposits and Withdrawals, if a casino handles a considerable volume of crypto, this transforms to FIAT and it is a lot of money, I think that is where they want to cover their backs so that they do not get sanctioned or get into trouble, possible lawsuits among others.
I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.
Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent
If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.
Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent
If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.
Jump to: