Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 35. (Read 547140 times)
June 08, 2014, 01:40:56 PM
Thanks, t-8 350 H/s - w7 64bits.
June 08, 2014, 01:17:37 PM
Excellent optimization Wolf! I got like 15% more than lucas miner on my non AES-NI VMs 
June 08, 2014, 11:09:53 AM
Bump for update.
Are you making a compiled version for windows? I don't see it in the post.
June 08, 2014, 10:28:14 AM
Keep up the good work. 
June 08, 2014, 04:10:47 AM
Hi
i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
but i have openssl installed and this archives at /usr/lib and /usr/lib64
My enviroment is centos 6.4
Tnks
i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
Code:
./minerd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Code:
libcrypto.so libcrypto.so.10 libcrypto.so.1.0.1e
My enviroment is centos 6.4
Tnks
Wait... so you compiled against libcrypto.so.1.0.0, but when you ran it, you had only libcrypto.so.1.0.1e?
You must have upgraded OpenSSL in the middle. Rebuild the miner.
I think my enviroment is a mess, i just copied my libcrypto.so.1.0.0 from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib64 and it works now
Anyway thanks a lot
June 08, 2014, 03:40:29 AM
Hi
i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
but i have openssl installed and this archives at /usr/lib and /usr/lib64
My enviroment is centos 6.4
Tnks
edit: I copied my libcrypto.so.1.0.0 from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib64 and it works now
i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
Code:
./minerd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Code:
libcrypto.so libcrypto.so.10 libcrypto.so.1.0.1e
My enviroment is centos 6.4
Tnks
edit: I copied my libcrypto.so.1.0.0 from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib64 and it works now
June 03, 2014, 05:04:53 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.
Hey mate,
are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.
The hashrate represents something near the real value on every other pool. If only Minergate is different, that would indicate something is wrong with them, not the miner.
June 07, 2014, 04:17:21 PM
AMD1055T won't run, you can solve? please .
June 07, 2014, 02:44:54 AM
Seems like everything after the may 28th commit doesn't work right for non-aesNI. Hashes are happening, but nothing is ever submitted to the pool. Gotta get more information but sleepy time now!
June 03, 2014, 04:07:51 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't.
...
...
Were you referring to that? Did you mean for that to be interpreted as "only a Win64 AES-NI binary is available" because when I first read it, it sounded like there was a non AES-NI build available somewhere. And you also mentioned some optimizations done to the legacy part as well so I'm a bit confused.
There are no non-AES-NI builds available, but it is possible to build for non-AES-NI. Sorry if that was misleading.
June 07, 2014, 01:03:01 AM
whats the .bat settings for 4770k @win7x64
June 06, 2014, 08:24:05 PM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual E5-2620 with -t 12.
It's not your GCC version - update your binutils. You may get a better hashrate with it.
Worked - thanks!
Slight speedup - +~10 H/s June 03, 2014, 03:39:10 PM
Hi, i don't know why but i can't get more than 100 hash/s on my i5-4670k clocked at 4.4Ghz and if i go with stock clock i can't get more than 80 hash/s :/
If you're using Windows, try Linux. Natively, not in a VM. Seriously, it helps.
This crashes on my intel Q6600 4 core processor.
Please read the OP next time.
June 06, 2014, 03:56:19 PM
Do you know what cpu models you were using with the amazon instance? I'm wondering if there is any more tweaking I can do with dual e5 2680s. I'm currently getting about 750 hash/s using 16 threads (tried the 21 threads that you used).
June 06, 2014, 06:52:55 AM
Do you have plans to add merged mining (for FCN) ?
June 05, 2014, 07:29:28 PM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual E5-2620 with -t 12.
June 05, 2014, 02:16:25 PM
Thanks for your reply wolf0
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
Configure with --disable-aes-ni
June 05, 2014, 01:59:55 PM
Thanks for your reply wolf0
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s
Thanks
June 05, 2014, 01:19:46 PM
Hello,
I have this on my openssl engine
jimmy1@localhost:~$ openssl engine
(rsax) RSAX engine support
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
How to add aesni to openssl engine?
Please
Thanks
I have this on my openssl engine
jimmy1@localhost:~$ openssl engine
(rsax) RSAX engine support
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support
How to add aesni to openssl engine?
Please
Thanks
June 05, 2014, 07:59:48 AM
Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.
Hi Wolf0. Can you explain why linux is quicker than Windows for this task? I'm running on Windows, and this PC isn't just for mining so I can't easily switch.
Thanks, Q
Jump to: