Hello,
Can someone build a version for Non-AES-NI please. All my PCs don't have AES-NI
Thanks
Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 36. (Read 547096 times)
June 04, 2014, 09:00:48 PM
June 04, 2014, 09:07:13 PM
good job man!
June 04, 2014, 07:23:19 AM
June 02, 2014, 11:25:13 PM
so are there any 32 bit options??
No. I mean, I could do it, but... there's no point. You'd be mining so slowly you'd be losing coins
June 04, 2014, 05:26:04 AM
OSX 10.9.3
brew install automake autoconf curl
then git clone repo, run autogen, run no macro.pl
When exec ./configure, I got error:
./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'
I have fresh install of OSX. What wrong?
Thanks.
brew install automake autoconf curl
then git clone repo, run autogen, run no macro.pl
When exec ./configure, I got error:
./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'
I have fresh install of OSX. What wrong?
Thanks.
June 03, 2014, 06:29:38 PM
e3 1230
June 03, 2014, 05:13:26 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.
Hey mate,
are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.
The hashrate represents something near the real value on every other pool. If only Minergate is different, that would indicate something is wrong with them, not the miner.
Thanks for the reply Wolf. I'll make some more tests tomorrow to compare actual mined coins on different scenarios.
June 03, 2014, 04:58:37 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.
Hey mate,
are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.
June 02, 2014, 03:49:00 AM
Recommends upgrading to ?
4.9.0 I know works. May as well stick to the latest.
June 03, 2014, 04:06:05 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't.
...
...
Were you referring to that? Did you mean for that to be interpreted as "only a Win64 AES-NI binary is available" because when I first read it, it sounded like there was a non AES-NI build available somewhere. And you also mentioned some optimizations done to the legacy part as well so I'm a bit confused.
June 03, 2014, 03:35:14 PM
This crashes on my intel Q6600 4 core processor.
June 02, 2014, 03:34:30 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
Update your toolchain would be my guess.
June 03, 2014, 11:26:48 AM
Hi, i don't know why but i can't get more than 100 hash/s on my i5-4670k clocked at 4.4Ghz and if i go with stock clock i can't get more than 80 hash/s :/
June 03, 2014, 09:26:56 AM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.
June 02, 2014, 02:04:28 AM
Boolberry uses a different algorithm, so no.
June 03, 2014, 07:59:22 AM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
June 03, 2014, 07:09:01 AM
June 03, 2014, 06:31:18 AM
4 threads easy get shares
June 03, 2014, 06:17:19 AM
I still keep getting the same error on this version (I had this on prior cpuminer versions as well)
After a random while (5 minutes, 2 hours), I start getting the following error and it doesn't fix unless I restart the minerd. What could be the cause?
I'm mining at Minergate BTW.
[2014-06-03 14:09:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 146.87 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-03 14:09:21] thread 3: 119 hashes, 17.18 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] json_rpc2.0 error: Slightly stale share
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:24] thread 2: 222 hashes, 16.28 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:25] thread 0: 80 hashes, 12.42 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:27] thread 1: 154 hashes, 20.35 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
After a random while (5 minutes, 2 hours), I start getting the following error and it doesn't fix unless I restart the minerd. What could be the cause?
I'm mining at Minergate BTW.
[2014-06-03 14:09:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 146.87 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-03 14:09:21] thread 3: 119 hashes, 17.18 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] json_rpc2.0 error: Slightly stale share
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:24] thread 2: 222 hashes, 16.28 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:25] thread 0: 80 hashes, 12.42 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:27] thread 1: 154 hashes, 20.35 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
June 03, 2014, 01:48:34 AM
so are there any 32 bit options??
No. I mean, I could do it, but... there's no point. You'd be mining so slowly you'd be losing coins
On my work i have 400+ pc with 32 bit windows 7. I can mine on all this machine with low priority and free electricity 24\7
. So 32 bit version would be great for me. I can donate 0.2 BTC for this.Sorry for my English.
Jump to: