Is there a link to the windows binaries of this new and faster version ?
I didn't find any thing in the OP
I didn't find any thing in the OP
No Win binaries exist yet.
Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 32. (Read 547096 times)
June 08, 2014, 08:27:23 PM
No Win binaries exist yet.
June 11, 2014, 12:13:12 AM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.
We're talking up to 40% - 50%.
Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...
[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)
June 10, 2014, 10:24:38 PM
The CPU is not really loaded, quite unusual.
After a time and vm.nr_hugepages I realized it is working. May I need to work out a better CPU utilization.
After a time and vm.nr_hugepages I realized it is working. May I need to work out a better CPU utilization.
June 08, 2014, 07:58:02 PM
Thanks! Working great.
btw i noticed that i get around 20h/8cores more when using gcc 4.7 instead of 4.6
btw i noticed that i get around 20h/8cores more when using gcc 4.7 instead of 4.6
I use 4.9.
June 10, 2014, 10:20:14 PM
I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17
At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock is 2.68).
I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.
The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quiet if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.
I have found numerous errors in config.log
At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17
At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock is 2.68).
I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.
The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quiet if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.
Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds
I have found numerous errors in config.log
At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log
June 10, 2014, 06:54:20 PM
Just wait for the news.
and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo
and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo
BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.
oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.
June 08, 2014, 07:13:52 PM
Waaaait - you're using it for scrypt, not cryptonight? There's no reason to do that - and I may blatantly break other algos to optimize CryptoNight.
mk. thought it was for scrypt. sorries.
Any guides towards this cryptonight I never heard of?
It's for XMR: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-a-secure-private-untraceable-cryptocurrency-583449
June 10, 2014, 06:13:41 PM
Just wait for the news.
and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo
and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo
June 08, 2014, 06:39:00 PM
Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?
Same thing.
Weird ain't it? lol.
Very...
I3-2100 CPU
mining multicoins at maniac scrypt. I also tried mining at litecoinpool.org. same thing.
Waaaait - you're using it for scrypt, not cryptonight? There's no reason to do that - and I may blatantly break other algos to optimize CryptoNight.
June 10, 2014, 05:57:24 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?
yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.
ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.
June 08, 2014, 06:33:27 PM
Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?
Same thing.
Weird ain't it? lol.
Very...
June 10, 2014, 03:49:54 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?
He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.
Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.
as far as u know right, cause cryptonote is anonymous.
June 08, 2014, 06:28:35 PM
Bump for another update!
Want to see something weird?
0.00 Khash/s.
Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?
June 10, 2014, 03:43:00 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?
He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.
Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.
June 08, 2014, 05:39:43 PM
Bump for another update!
June 10, 2014, 03:36:47 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?
yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests
June 10, 2014, 03:33:24 PM
How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows? This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes. Thanks.
June 08, 2014, 02:44:47 PM
Working on more optimizations, but dammit, it won't stay stable: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/newminer2.png
June 10, 2014, 03:10:06 PM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.
June 10, 2014, 02:41:40 PM
Linux:
http://s27.postimg.org/854scak03/coins1.jpg
VS
Windows:
http://s3.postimg.org/swqutdehv/coin2.jpg
http://s27.postimg.org/854scak03/coins1.jpg
VS
Windows:
http://s3.postimg.org/swqutdehv/coin2.jpg
Thanks for not helping ;-)
Jump to: