Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 37. (Read 547096 times)
June 02, 2014, 09:14:33 PM
so are there any 32 bit options??
June 02, 2014, 04:50:33 AM
How do you control number of threads or optimize this, has made my pc unusable
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -p x -u [YourMoneroAddress]
I just followed above.
EDIT found it... --help hahah
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -p x -u [YourMoneroAddress]
I just followed above.
EDIT found it... --help hahah
June 01, 2014, 04:53:02 AM
I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.
Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!
Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!
Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.
June 02, 2014, 04:45:53 AM
many thanks!
June 02, 2014, 03:41:57 AM
Recommends upgrading to ?
June 01, 2014, 04:50:20 AM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.
You don't need a payment ID.
The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.
Then use any payment ID. As long as it's the right length and all hex digits, it should accept it. Try this:
5a6f13d8a3e90f0694c20ee9900a23bfe8c0008e7ec0deadbeefcafebaadf00d
June 02, 2014, 03:30:24 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
June 02, 2014, 01:08:33 AM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care
grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s
How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks
maybe a monero if I'm lucky
June 01, 2014, 01:07:36 AM
I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads
All the cores aren't real. Often, by using more than 4 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU, you're overloading it, therefore it runs slower. Three threads allows one thread for the output - it also lets the CPU schedule the threads, because if the thread number is a multiple of the core count, the code binds threads to cores, which is a bad idea according to my testing.
June 01, 2014, 11:03:51 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care
grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s
How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks
June 01, 2014, 05:35:35 PM
June 01, 2014, 12:30:57 AM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then? I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
upon starting up the miner.
Configure with --disable-aes-ni
Thank you. That worked.
Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner. I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI. Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.
I did do some work on the non-AES-NI implementation recently. Try running it natively.
June 01, 2014, 01:35:07 PM
Hi,
Really great work on this. Would it be possible for you to add another crypto algorithm? I would love it if DCrypt could be added for Slimcoin mining. There is a fork of cpuminer called slimminer (that I can't get to compile on Windows) and it would be amazing if it could get integrated in this optimized cpuminer-multi. Will definitely donate.
Mike
Really great work on this. Would it be possible for you to add another crypto algorithm? I would love it if DCrypt could be added for Slimcoin mining. There is a fork of cpuminer called slimminer (that I can't get to compile on Windows) and it would be amazing if it could get integrated in this optimized cpuminer-multi. Will definitely donate.
Mike
June 01, 2014, 01:16:54 PM
Great performance running 3 threads on an i7 2600. Pulling ~180H/s. More threads hurts performance, so less threads definitely does seem like more here.
2 threads has the same performance as 8 threads, and 3 threads definitely pushes the most hashrate. Interestingly, 3 threads uses only 40% CPU... must be hitting some cache limits or something.
(Windows rig this one - most of my machines run linux, but have Core2Duos without AES-NI).
2 threads has the same performance as 8 threads, and 3 threads definitely pushes the most hashrate. Interestingly, 3 threads uses only 40% CPU... must be hitting some cache limits or something.
(Windows rig this one - most of my machines run linux, but have Core2Duos without AES-NI).
May 31, 2014, 08:13:17 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care
grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s
No problem. New test posted, as well.
June 01, 2014, 12:47:45 PM
Thanks for the awesome work.
I'm trying to donate a couple of MRO but i'm getting "Invalid Send Address" when using the address in the first post and the payment id.
I'm trying to donate a couple of MRO but i'm getting "Invalid Send Address" when using the address in the first post and the payment id.
June 01, 2014, 04:50:47 AM
I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.
Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!
Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!
May 31, 2014, 08:05:12 PM
Bump. Results of new test published.
June 01, 2014, 04:47:17 AM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.
You don't need a payment ID.
The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.
May 31, 2014, 06:29:16 PM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.
You don't need a payment ID.
When I tried to replicate Wolf's results, I only got about 750 hs on the 32 core instance with his miner. Any ideas?
Hm... I may redo the test on a Digital Ocean droplet.
Jump to: