Bitcoins and no internet don't mix.
actually bitcoin could work quite well without internet. probably not if the devs raise the block size too much though.
Without the internet bitcoin will not have any value.
Topic: World War III and BTC - page 5. (Read 7493 times)
actually bitcoin could work quite well without internet. probably not if the devs raise the block size too much though.
Without the internet bitcoin will not have any value.
But you will need the internet to download the Bitcoin client etc. Can do without the Internet for transactions also
Bitcoins and no internet don't mix.
actually bitcoin could work quite well without internet. probably not if the devs raise the block size too much though.
Bitcoins and no internet don't mix.
if you believe that ww3 is going to happen soon you should invest your money into basic survival things...not into bitcoin
So the basic thrust of your arguement is US forces had self-exploding tanks, bombers who could not hit a beach, and generally incompetent leadership. I believe you also ranted about WWI helmets, ugly casualty rates, fire bombing of cities, atomic weapons and fearsome enemies flying bamboo airplanes.
So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
Actually if oil prices in Europe skyrocketed due to being cut off for example the american based oil producers would simply prioritize selling to Europe. Free market and all that so of course they will sell where they get the most profit. Its also fun how you always expect that everyone wants your help and you base that on WW2.... when the whole world had to band together against Germany.... Which is in Europe.... And is currently a much nicer country then America ever was.... I honestly dont see a problem with the Atlantic Ocean being between us right now. Could perhaps have been wider but one can dream.So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
I gave you ample evidence on Americas lack of morals, leadership, preparedness, priorities, realistic view point and training. The fact that you exist and X country dont has nothing to do with your "greatness" and you just claiming it is outright childish. A country does not need to be successful or unique in any way to persist. Cant you see how silly you are going "haha we lived longer then youuuu"?
You claim that Germany, Italy and Japan does no longer exist? They are far greater now then they ever were. Who do you think is leading the world in stuff like Technology, economy and social development? Who the heck needs oil when we get our electricity from green energy combined with nuclear power plants?
I believe USA will be the one to START WW3. No one else seams to bother except some arab countries that have not had peace since they invented the stick.
The Germany, Italy and Japan that started WW2 no longer exist. What we now call Germany, Italy and Japan exist by the efforts of those Americans whose morals, leadership, preparedness, priorities, realistic viewpoint and training you question.
Yes, I have been in Germany, Italy and Japan. The US funded reconstruction did wonders. The US funded protection from encroaching powers provided an opportunity for these nations become strong again. If you really want to see the value the US provided to those nations, take a wander through, East Germany, Czech, Slovak, Poland and Hungary. (Yes, I have.) There you will see what happened when the morally bankrupt, incompetent, etc Americans were not around to make it all better.
Your fear that the US will start WW3 is, IMHO, unfounded. Historically, the US is an isolationist country with strong internal pressures to disarm. You pointed that out quite correctly with your observations regarding exploding tanks, crappy equipment and poor training. If the US were intent on conquering the world, we would be paying a little more attention to the military forces needed. Right now, in fact, the US military is downsizing. Our nuclear weapon stockpiles are being reduced. Our manning levels in all the services are being cut. Now, I am sure you can come up with some way that points to the US getting ready for WW3.
BTW, I am delighted that you take such joy in using the peaceful nuclear technology developed by your friends, the Americans. As someone who spent my first years as an adult operating a nuclear reactor, I have always felt we have not benefited enough from that technology.
Back on topic, bitcoin will only be useful post WW3 if there is enough of the internet left to serve all those who want to use bitcoin. Since we have not yet reached agreement on what WW3 would look like, it is foolish to attempt to answer the question.
First of there is an immense difference between USA back then and now. For example remember how long it took for America to get involved in WW2? Now remember that not that long ago America jumped headlong into a war with Iraq over 9/11 which Iraq had no part of in the first place. If you think America is this peace loving nation that only want to keep to itself then tell me the longest period you have ever had peace in America. You can pick any part of your history it makes no difference in the end.
Lets see how long you will have peace after the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. With how eager you seam to invade Syria I am not expecting a new record this time either. Another important fact is that America spends more on its military then the next 15 countries combined and guess how many of those 15 countries are its allies? There is not a question about if America is "prepared" to start a world war. Its a question of if they will have enough time to fuck it up that much before someone else do it intentionally. Do not get me wrong I am not afraid of war. I could not care less about if I live or die honestly. I am just being realistic here and saying that America is capable of starting WW3, active in warfare, constantly instigating its enemies and incompetent enough to one day fuck things up for everyone.
Do not bother speaking about 2 countries that hardly suffered infrastructure damage during the war and Germany that only brushed off the dust on its shoulders after WW1 to become the predominant super power in a few decades. For all the help you "gave" it was far out weight by the spoils of war you took at the conclusion of the war not to mention the allies were the cause of the spreading of Nazism to begin with. You created your own worst enemy after WW1 when you made life miserable for the Germans after the war. Anyway point is Italy and Japan could just continue with business as usual a few years after the war and Germany is robust enough to rebuild itself even with your so called "help". I am sure they are still thankful for the Berlin wall.
I would like to draw your attention to a specific man. Albert Einstein. A German and father to Nuclear energy and the Atomic bomb. The Nuclear reactor itself and the components for it was developed all around the world and the first Nuclear power plant was built in Russia. Its clear as day that whatever development America did was not a critical discovery meaning it was going to be rapidly discovered by someone else if America had not gotten to it first. If anything America might have saved a year or two of time and I am being generous here.
If 25% of the internet was cut off or more chances are that the credibility of bitcoin will be hit hard. Perhaps even crippled to the point where inverters wont trust it anymore and that will bring the downfall of Bitcoin as a currency. You also have to consider that with a World war people will either withdraw their investments OR relocate them to take advantage of the most lucrative market on the planet. Warfare.
So the basic thrust of your arguement is US forces had self-exploding tanks, bombers who could not hit a beach, and generally incompetent leadership. I believe you also ranted about WWI helmets, ugly casualty rates, fire bombing of cities, atomic weapons and fearsome enemies flying bamboo airplanes.
So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
Actually if oil prices in Europe skyrocketed due to being cut off for example the american based oil producers would simply prioritize selling to Europe. Free market and all that so of course they will sell where they get the most profit. Its also fun how you always expect that everyone wants your help and you base that on WW2.... when the whole world had to band together against Germany.... Which is in Europe.... And is currently a much nicer country then America ever was.... I honestly dont see a problem with the Atlantic Ocean being between us right now. Could perhaps have been wider but one can dream.So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
I gave you ample evidence on Americas lack of morals, leadership, preparedness, priorities, realistic view point and training. The fact that you exist and X country dont has nothing to do with your "greatness" and you just claiming it is outright childish. A country does not need to be successful or unique in any way to persist. Cant you see how silly you are going "haha we lived longer then youuuu"?
You claim that Germany, Italy and Japan does no longer exist? They are far greater now then they ever were. Who do you think is leading the world in stuff like Technology, economy and social development? Who the heck needs oil when we get our electricity from green energy combined with nuclear power plants?
I believe USA will be the one to START WW3. No one else seams to bother except some arab countries that have not had peace since they invented the stick.
The Germany, Italy and Japan that started WW2 no longer exist. What we now call Germany, Italy and Japan exist by the efforts of those Americans whose morals, leadership, preparedness, priorities, realistic viewpoint and training you question.
Yes, I have been in Germany, Italy and Japan. The US funded reconstruction did wonders. The US funded protection from encroaching powers provided an opportunity for these nations become strong again. If you really want to see the value the US provided to those nations, take a wander through, East Germany, Czech, Slovak, Poland and Hungary. (Yes, I have.) There you will see what happened when the morally bankrupt, incompetent, etc Americans were not around to make it all better.
Your fear that the US will start WW3 is, IMHO, unfounded. Historically, the US is an isolationist country with strong internal pressures to disarm. You pointed that out quite correctly with your observations regarding exploding tanks, crappy equipment and poor training. If the US were intent on conquering the world, we would be paying a little more attention to the military forces needed. Right now, in fact, the US military is downsizing. Our nuclear weapon stockpiles are being reduced. Our manning levels in all the services are being cut. Now, I am sure you can come up with some way that points to the US getting ready for WW3.
BTW, I am delighted that you take such joy in using the peaceful nuclear technology developed by your friends, the Americans. As someone who spent my first years as an adult operating a nuclear reactor, I have always felt we have not benefited enough from that technology.
Back on topic, bitcoin will only be useful post WW3 if there is enough of the internet left to serve all those who want to use bitcoin. Since we have not yet reached agreement on what WW3 would look like, it is foolish to attempt to answer the question.
If WWIII takes place in my lifetime I'll definitely try to get as far away as I possibly can. Far into the wilderness. My goal would be to have a small, self-sustained society.
And lets not forget that there's nuclear weapons in every part of the land and the sea, many of which we do not know the whereabouts
exactly . i am surprised i am still alive
And lets not forget that there's nuclear weapons in every part of the land and the sea, many of which we do not know the whereabouts
How about drying up the money supply for the banks before anything worse happens. Deal in bitcoins and exclude the bank(st)ers! I suggest a social review system on top of bitcoin transactions. For example verification of bitcoin addresses you are dealing with. Follow the good trail of commerce! Military has to get paid, they won't go to war for nothing so they won't follow the bankers without them having the money (press) anymore. With all the money spent for the bankers and for the military we already could/would have paradise on earth. It's already there, but the satanists are preventing it. Sad. Ok we could question what was first, religious extremism or bankers. That's another problem to discuss and it seems there are not only materialistic problems to solve here on earth. I hope money can some day be a thing of the past, and before we could invent intermediary forms of money that inherently spread love and wealth amongst humanity. Be inventive!
Countries don't start wars, bankers do. Remember, there is nothing more lucrative to a bank than a war. World War III will be started by bankers. The countries participating are just pieces on the board.
banks don't have standing armies. only governments have those. a government is like a giant robot death machine available for rent to the highest bidder. not so unexpectedly the highest bidder is often a banker. Eliminating banks wouldn't address this problem though. If you still have the robot death machine it will simply be piloted by the next highest bidder. The way to address this problem is not to persecute bankers, they would serve a useful function in a free society, but rather to not create the giant robot death machine to begin with.
With WWIII on the menu you have to realize that whoever survives will be much better off than before, in terms of physical wealth. In terms of infrastructure there will be terrible consequences rendering all wealth relatively useless.
No there wont be ww3
WWIII has always been happening -- in the financial world.
I opened this discussion on the General discussion area, if you guys want to read more and/or post replies there:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/world-war-iii-and-btc-210850
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/world-war-iii-and-btc-210850
Countries don't start wars, bankers do. Remember, there is nothing more lucrative to a bank than a war. World War III will be started by bankers. The countries participating are just pieces on the board.
banks don't have standing armies. only governments have those. a government is like a giant robot death machine available for rent to the highest bidder. not so unexpectedly the highest bidder is often a banker. Eliminating banks wouldn't address this problem though. If you still have the robot death machine it will simply be piloted by the next highest bidder. The way to address this problem is not to persecute bankers, they would serve a useful function in a free society, but rather to not create the giant robot death machine to begin with.
So the basic thrust of your arguement is US forces had self-exploding tanks, bombers who could not hit a beach, and generally incompetent leadership. I believe you also ranted about WWI helmets, ugly casualty rates, fire bombing of cities, atomic weapons and fearsome enemies flying bamboo airplanes.
So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
Actually if oil prices in Europe skyrocketed due to being cut off for example the american based oil producers would simply prioritize selling to Europe. Free market and all that so of course they will sell where they get the most profit. Its also fun how you always expect that everyone wants your help and you base that on WW2.... when the whole world had to band together against Germany.... Which is in Europe.... And is currently a much nicer country then America ever was.... I honestly dont see a problem with the Atlantic Ocean being between us right now. Could perhaps have been wider but one can dream.So, if the US forces were as incompetent as described why do the WWII nations of Germany, Italy, Japan and USSR no longer exist?
Seems to me that despite all the faults, failures and just plain incompetence that you have so carefully located, the US soldier, sailor, airman and Marine simply kicked ass. Something about being willing to say "NUTS".
So my question still remains.
Why should the US protect Europe, Japan, Taiwan or Korea? Why should the US protect the Middle East oil fields when the majority of that product goes to Europe, Japan, and China? What does the US care if heating oil prices in Europe skyrocket?
If you really think the US is going to get involved in your WW3 scenarios, you better explain why the US will be interested.
I gave you ample evidence on Americas lack of morals, leadership, preparedness, priorities, realistic view point and training. The fact that you exist and X country dont has nothing to do with your "greatness" and you just claiming it is outright childish. A country does not need to be successful or unique in any way to persist. Cant you see how silly you are going "haha we lived longer then youuuu"?
You claim that Germany, Italy and Japan does no longer exist? They are far greater now then they ever were. Who do you think is leading the world in stuff like Technology, economy and social development? Who the heck needs oil when we get our electricity from green energy combined with nuclear power plants?
I believe USA will be the one to START WW3. No one else seams to bother except some arab countries that have not had peace since they invented the stick.
^This.
+1
Of course you are right. Germany and Japan is HUGE when it comes to technology.
I fear that my country of Sweden would take side with US when the time of war comes... since we no longer have the military resources to defend ourselves, we kind of have to take side with SOMEONE. I don't want any part of that stuff so I'd probably just travel 1100 miles north and go back to basics!
Bitcoins will be my last attempt when WWIII exploded. Here real thing we shoud have.
1. Gold
2. Clean Water
3. Land for farming
4. Livestock
5. Bow and horses
1. Gold
2. Clean Water
3. Land for farming
4. Livestock
5. Bow and horses
LOL why no.1 is Gold? You gonna make nice gold necklaces for your eventually starved-to-death body ? ^^
I mean, there would be better imho to prioritize food and water. Points 2-5 is what I'd care about. Bling-bling can wait.
Bitcoins will be my last attempt when WWIII exploded. Here real thing we shoud have.
1. Gold
2. Clean Water
3. Land for farming
4. Livestock
5. Bow and horses
1. Gold
2. Clean Water
3. Land for farming
4. Livestock
5. Bow and horses
Jump to: