at the moment on this coin, only three interesting miners are Enemy 1.08/Suprminer 1.6/Silent Miner v1.0.9. 
Topic: X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log - page 8. (Read 7659 times)
Thanks to the author for the interesting tests - it is now clear which miner to choose for the Ravencoin, but why in the test included the old versions of the ENеMY miner and the rest at the moment on this coin, only three interesting miners are Enemy 1.08/Suprminer 1.6/Silent Miner v1.0.9.
at the moment on this coin, only three interesting miners are Enemy 1.08/Suprminer 1.6/Silent Miner v1.0.9. Thanks for the testing, it has been very helpful.
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
I have a few Zotac Amp Extreme GPUs in this test rig, they're factory OC'd. With as little as +100 core, they'll crash. So, unfortunately I can't reliably test core OC
I had a 1070Ti Zotac Amp Extreme - pulled it from operations (only had 1 and I'm running
God I hated that GPU - no matter how or what I did, it crashed.
BTW - nice work on the testing. Love the multi round thing.
Great work man. Appreciate it!
Any benchmarks to give idea about intensity 20 vs 21 hash speed differences?
Any benchmarks to give idea about intensity 20 vs 21 hash speed differences?
check out: https://ravenforum.org/topic/29/suprminer-1-6-i-19-vs-i-20-vs-i-21-test-results
Amazing post thanks!! KUDOS!!!!!
Really great post, much appreciated!
Great work man. Appreciate it!
Any benchmarks to give idea about intensity 20 vs 21 hash speed differences?
Any benchmarks to give idea about intensity 20 vs 21 hash speed differences?
Nice setup.
Comparisons need to be tested over time.
Good job mate.
#crysx
Comparisons need to be tested over time.
Good job mate.
#crysx
Thanks for the testing, it has been very helpful.
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
I have a few Zotac Amp Extreme GPUs in this test rig, they're factory OC'd. With as little as +100 core, they'll crash. So, unfortunately I can't reliably test core OC
Thanks for the testing, it has been very helpful.
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
Anyway you could do more testing in regards to overclock (specificially TDP and core clock)?
Over the past few weeks I've done a number of "head to head" miner tests running at the same time on the same rig on the same pool, with multiple rounds to allow each miner to run on each GPU grouping (with exception of some early tests).
I've posted these results on https://ravenforum.org and various Discord channels. Unfortunately, the formatting and site speed on ravenforum.org are less than optimal. So, I'm here, posting the results for posterity's sake?
Here they are in reverse chronological order:
Instance Balance Test... are they really balanced? yes, yes they are.
April 28th, 2018 - 692 Minutes - No restarts
Enemy 1.09a Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git4a static diff
May 10th, 2018 - Full Test Results.
I've posted these results on https://ravenforum.org and various Discord channels. Unfortunately, the formatting and site speed on ravenforum.org are less than optimal. So, I'm here, posting the results for posterity's sake?
Here they are in reverse chronological order:
Instance Balance Test... are they really balanced? yes, yes they are.
April 28th, 2018 - 692 Minutes - No restarts
- [Instance 1] 205.21 RVN - Pool Link
- [Instance 2] 205.11 RVN - Pool Link
- [Instance 3] 202.17 RVN - Pool Link
Enemy 1.09a Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git4a static diff
May 10th, 2018 - Full Test Results.
| #1 | *
Jump to:
|