X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log - page 3.

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Quote from: RealSwissMiner on May 10, 2018, 12:53:01 AM

Great overview, much appreciated.
As far as I can see nevermore miner was only used in one benchmark series and wasn't doing that bad. Do you keep an eye on it as future improvements could be promising?

Brian has been busy focusing on Team Red, with Avermore. If he decides to release a meaningful update to Nevermore, I'll definitely test it again.

RealSwissMiner

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 15

Great overview, much appreciated.
As far as I can see nevermore miner was only used in one benchmark series and wasn't doing that bad. Do you keep an eye on it as future improvements could be promising?

nsummy

full member

Activity: 1179

Merit: 131

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 11:11:30 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 10:38:19 AM

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 10:23:51 AM

And yet, even with 1% dev mining, enemy 1.08 and 1.09 came out ahead in testing.

1 week ago there was no enemy 1.09 miner right? This is because after I started to publish my opensource improvements, enemy copied my work and included it into his miner for a 5% boost. I have added a few percent on sp-mod #4, so it should be faster than 1.08. opensource, free and without a virus.

Your first commit was May 3rd, the beta of enemy 1.09 was released May 5th.

Did he steal your code, I have no clue.
Did you steal code to make your "private" miner? absolutely.

is enemy 1.09 the fastest miner that doesn't cost 0.5BTC? sure seems like it.

and stop spreading FUD.. you know as well as anyone, that most mining software can trigger anti virus warnings

Unless I am missing something, this sp-mod doesn't cost anything, is open source, and has no dev-fee. I have no clue how fast it is compared to z-enemy, but you have to give some credit where it is due.

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Enemy 1.09a Pool / Stratum Difficulty Testing:

For this test I used a single 12 GPU 1080Ti rig on Windows 10, split into three mining instances. All three mining instances were balanced to get as close to the same hash rate as possible. Each mining instance is running at the same time on the same machine mining on the same pool.

All three instances have intensity set to 21, GPU target power set to 100%, no overclocking.

The instances/rig are managed by Awesome Miner, which restarts the miners for various reasons, based on rules I set.

The plan is to do two rounds of testing, each round lasting approximately 10-12hrs, at the conclusion of each round I'll rotate the miner to a new instance, until each miner has had a chance to run on each instance. I'll also normalize the results to averaged blocks found per round.

Miner tested:
Enemy 1.09a - 1% dev fee

Testing:

Variable Diff / pool set diff
d=40 (1/2 of my avg hash | i.e. divide hash by 2)

Results:

Round 1 - Duration: 645 minutes - 155 Blocks found

[Instance 1] Normalized: 120.73 RVN | Raw: 131.32 RVN - Var Diff - Pool Link
[Instance 2] Normalized: 127.36 RVN | Raw: 138.53 RVN - d=40 Pool Link

Round 2 - Duration: 632 minutes - 130 Blocks found

[Instance 1] Normalized: 127.81 RVN | Raw: 116.60 RVN - d=40 - Pool Link
[Instance 2] Normalized: 121.28 RVN | Raw: 110.64 RVN - Var Diff - Pool Link

FINAL Normalized Average Results

#1

*

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 10:38:19 AM

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 10:23:51 AM

And yet, even with 1% dev mining, enemy 1.08 and 1.09 came out ahead in testing.

1 week ago there was no enemy 1.09 miner right? This is because after I started to publish my opensource improvements, enemy copied my work and included it into his miner for a 5% boost. I have added a few percent on sp-mod #4, so it should be faster than 1.08. opensource, free and without a virus.

Your first commit was May 3rd, the beta of enemy 1.09 was released May 5th.

Did he steal your code, I have no clue.
Did you steal code to make your "private" miner? absolutely.

is enemy 1.09 the fastest miner that doesn't cost 0.5BTC? sure seems like it.

and stop spreading FUD.. you know as well as anyone, that most mining software can trigger anti virus warnings

rednoW

legendary

Activity: 1510

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 10:38:19 AM

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 10:23:51 AM

And yet, even with 1% dev mining, enemy 1.08 and 1.09 came out ahead in testing.

1 week ago there was no enemy 1.09 miner right? This is because after I started to publish my opensource improvements, enemy copied my work and included it into his miner for a 5% boost. I have added a few percent on sp-mod #4, so it should be faster than 1.08. opensource, free and without a virus.

You are liar again. enemy 1.09 v5 has no kernel improvements comparing to 1.09 v1 . Only stratum and devfee part was updated and some minor bug fixed. That gives additional boost.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 10:23:51 AM

And yet, even with 1% dev mining, enemy 1.08 and 1.09 came out ahead in testing.

1 week ago there was no enemy 1.09 miner right? This is because after I started to publish my opensource improvements, enemy copied my work and included it into his miner for a 5% boost. I have added a few percent on sp-mod #4, so it should be faster than 1.08. opensource, free and without a virus.

djn053

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

my computer reported that 1.09 have win64.trojan.miner.Sxxs. but not in 1.05-1.08.
what should I do?

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 07:59:34 AM

but you need to run each round for 12 hours, if not the comparison is not fair. You run 2 rounds 9 hours and 1 round 12 hours. 12 hours is not enough to make a good prediction.

why is 12hrs the magical number? why not 24 or 48, when is enough enough to see a pattern?

look at the posted graphs, the outcome is generally decided after as little as 4-6 hours.

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 07:59:34 AM

Instead of X16r, you shoudl compare the x16s algo.

I'm not an altruistic miner, I mine to make a profit. There's nothing nearly as profitable as RVN [x16r] on [x16s], with the exception of PGN for a few hours every ~5 days when their difficulty nose dives. If you want to sponsor a test on x16s, I'll take your BTC and run it for how ever long you'd like.

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 06:46:43 AM

sp-mod was credited with two very small blocks that the other miners were not

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 07:59:34 AM

Because they where busy mining the devfee. (switching pools, missing profits)

And yet, even with 1% dev mining, enemy 1.08 and 1.09 came out ahead in testing.

cost82el

newbie

Activity: 91

Merit: 0

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 06:46:43 AM

The reason I do three rounds, with each miner running on an instance one time, is that the rig has a mix of 1080Ti cards, and as much as I've done to balance the instances so that they hash the same, they're not identical and some differences are to be expected.

but you need to run each round for 12 hours, if not the comparison is not fair. You run 2 rounds 9 hours and 1 round 12 hours. 12 hours is not enough to make a good prediction.

Instead of X16r, you shoudl compare the x16s algo.

Quote from: JackIT on May 09, 2018, 06:46:43 AM

sp-mod was credited with two very small blocks that the other miners were not

Because they where busy mining the devfee. (switching pools, missing profits)

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 02:19:09 AM

in round #3 spmod-git3 was faster than enemy 1.08

now you can try spmod-git4

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4

You can't cherry pick a round and declare victory.

The reason I do three rounds, with each miner running on an instance one time, is that the rig has a mix of 1080Ti cards, and as much as I've done to balance the instances so that they hash the same, they're not identical and some differences are to be expected.

Analyzing the weighted and normalized performance of the three instances, Instance 1 and 2 performed within 1% of each other, Instance 3 performed 3-4% better than the other two.

Also, towards the beginning of round three, ravenminer experienced a DDOS attack. This resulted in two things. testing was paused for approximately 2 hours, and sp-mod was credited with two very small blocks that the other miners were not. (a total of 0.243 RVN)

Full Test Results

FINAL Normalized Average Results

#1

*

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

what u need to do is create an optimized miner for opencl

I would willing switch all my rx cards and vegas if an rx 580 with optimal mem
straps was not basiclly btween a 1050ti and a 1060 lol

nitrobg

member

Activity: 413

Merit: 17

Quote from: sp_ on May 09, 2018, 02:19:09 AM

in round #3 spmod-git3 was faster than enemy 1.08

now you can try spmod-git4

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4

Release already the full binary with a dev fee, we don't mind it as long as it's the fastest miner available.
Since Enemy 1.09 is way faster than your public version, we'll simply use it instead of yours.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

in round #3 spmod-git3 was faster than enemy 1.08

now you can try spmod-git4

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

abanamat

jr. member

Activity: 274

Merit: 1

JackIT

jr. member

Activity: 99

Merit: 8

Round 2 of Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git3 results are in
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36628995

After 2 rounds:

Normalized Average Results

#1

*

Fenixn

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: Bimmber on May 08, 2018, 06:23:09 AM

Quote from: Fenixn on May 08, 2018, 06:09:12 AM

Hi, I have some quick question Grin

1 of my mining rig have 6x gtx 1060 3gb and computer have normal cpu and 4 gb ram and 60gb swap file but on normal slow hdd so I was curious which -i was be better for this specific rig for mining raven with the new enemy 1.09, when I have slow swap file no quick swap file on ssd, so does matter -i 19, -i 20, -i 21, -i 21.5 or it does not matter or which is best ? Thanks for answer Grin

Wrong thread. This is not topic to ask advice, but for testing.

Well, I sorry that its not correct topic but it was only curiosity and above that topic on this specfic question dosnt exist so, and I test the new program so this is also the case of this topic i run my rig 12 hour on -i 21 without instability.

Pages:

«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
»

Bitcoin Forum>Alternate cryptocurrencies>Mining (Altcoins)

Jump to:

Topic: X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log - page 3. (Read 7659 times)