It's odd that I keep getting banned from the official Blocknet thread for trying to share publicly available information.
http://www.plymouthdeeds.org/
Topic: XCurrency (XC) BlockNet community thread - page 13. (Read 29212 times)
XC forum offline. No more posts on btctalk. Sweeping info under the rug. Dan Metcalf doesn't want you to know the truth. Dan, you out there? Ready to discuss your federal tax lien and fraud with feds?
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
+1000
Classy bunch.
I'll just reply that I have no satisfaction in any of you losing money. But immense satisfaction in the fact that it more people won't get sucked into this circlejerk closed source "anon coin"
It was Dan and Syn and Teka that sold you those cheap coins before moving on. Not me. I'm not to blame for your coins problems
rdnkjdi is right...I too invested a small amount in Blocknet shares(Less than $1000 usd), along with buying a bit of XC. I've sold out of it completely. Always invest what you have to lose...If you look at the Blocknet github, Dan has done absolutely nothing.
XC/Blocknet is a scam, plain and simple. The warning signs were there, XC's code not being open sourced, their mixer allegedly taken from fedoracoin, and I believe Dan having charges against him for not paying taxes.
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
+1000
Classy bunch.
I'll just reply that I have no satisfaction in any of you losing money. But immense satisfaction in the fact that it more people won't get sucked into this circlejerk closed source "anon coin"
It was Dan and Syn and Teka that sold you those cheap coins before moving on. Not me. I'm not to blame for your coins problems
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
+1000
Lolz. An asshole crying over his financial loss, this brings me great happiness.
So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.
So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.
I haven't smeared anything. I followed his project. And Dan smeared it himself.
I just ask questions people don't like.
I don't have the power to screw XC over the way that associating with prom, being caughy in bold faced lies about creating a different competing coin, diluting XC with a new ICO that contains features on the future XC roadmap, dumping the premise and not following up on a promise to be transparent (after ignoring the last one)
I am not responsible for any of it. I'm only responsible for not turning a blind eye
Lolz. An asshole crying over his financial loss, this brings me great happiness.
So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.
So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.
Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least. Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp. You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel. By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof. And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands. Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.
I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.
Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD" But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.
Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"
So stupid. If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)
But rather than do what's best for shareholders they attack the messengers, play up the victim and violate their promises.
So yeah ... dance in the rain that I lost money. Just know the guys you are championing could actually be doing something to win back an iota of credibility if there actually are good answers to the questions laid out. But instead they are encouraging you to put the focus on people like me while their total lack of integrity is ruining your coin.
So keep giving Dan, Syn and Teka tuggies. Just know they don't have your back or they'd be responding to this debacle entirely differently.
P.S. If you're a shining example of a "good attitude" then I think I'm doing just fine. I've never gloated over XC hodlers losing money the way you guys have me.
I love seeing the truth come out so more people don't get suckered in. But I don't gloat over people losing money. Even assholes.
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
I've provided a suggestion for your post. Please be reasonable.
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.
You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.
Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.
When will the official BlockNet numbers be released? Are we still waiting on all of the coins to be burned?
Since everything gets deleted in the main thread (I know people who don't like who I am but I feel what I have to say has merit) then I'm posting my three replies here.
Even if I'm a horrible person and just in it to destroy a coin because darkcoin or shadycoin(shadowcoin?) or whatever is paying me (which isn't the case) if what I have to say is true. Then it really doesn't matter.
No one but the core team is responsible for all this shit & for not being transparent like THEY PROMISED
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like. But can't find the time to be transparent like they promised or tactfully answer their supporters questions doesn't sit well for their legitimacy.
Try to get over the messenger and look at the message people.
No one is paid to FUD XC. It isn't an organized effort. I don't get along with Spotniek half the time. He sure as hell isn't on anyone's payroll. Mr McHammer just seems like some dude who lost his big toe and thinks Dan is to blame.
There's little to no organization or collaboration on the "FUD campaign"
Stating that all FUD is an organized effort is really just a springboard to avoid questions & inconvenient truth.
Even if I'm a horrible person and just in it to destroy a coin because darkcoin or shadycoin(shadowcoin?) or whatever is paying me (which isn't the case) if what I have to say is true. Then it really doesn't matter.
No one but the core team is responsible for all this shit & for not being transparent like THEY PROMISED
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like. But can't find the time to be transparent like they promised or tactfully answer their supporters questions doesn't sit well for their legitimacy.
Try to get over the messenger and look at the message people.
Quote
Neither I nor ANY of the "FUDDERS" are responsible for the lack of transparency that was promised, the truth that came out about Prom, that your PR guy is being borderline rude, that the premine was likely distributed to the market, or the fact that Blocknet has massively dilluted XC in both roadmap (what people were expecting) and resources.
We DID NOT MAKE THE DECISIONS THAT CAUSED MASSIVE COIN HEMORRHAGING. We might have been a slight pain in the ass in not letting things go that the PR team would have liked to see us let go - but I think your aggressive attitude is misplaced. Maybe you should start asking yourself who is responsible rather than who won't shut up.
We DID NOT MAKE THE DECISIONS THAT CAUSED MASSIVE COIN HEMORRHAGING. We might have been a slight pain in the ass in not letting things go that the PR team would have liked to see us let go - but I think your aggressive attitude is misplaced. Maybe you should start asking yourself who is responsible rather than who won't shut up.
Quote
No one is paid to FUD XC. It isn't an organized effort. I don't get along with Spotniek half the time. He sure as hell isn't on anyone's payroll. Mr McHammer just seems like some dude who lost his big toe and thinks Dan is to blame.
There's little to no organization or collaboration on the "FUD campaign"
Stating that all FUD is an organized effort is really just a springboard to avoid questions & inconvenient truth.
Quote
What? No. I'm posting exactly what / with who I want.
I think you guys are missing the point. It's like people getting pissed at the whistle blowers on the catholic church instead of the priests. I'm not the source of your pain. Period. Neither is shadowcashcoin or paid shills or whoever the hell else you think is behind the FUD.
We weren't the ones who made the decisions that are driving your coin into the dirt.
Maybe it's just people pissed at the shady practices happening in crypto who don't mind calling it out.
I think you guys are missing the point. It's like people getting pissed at the whistle blowers on the catholic church instead of the priests. I'm not the source of your pain. Period. Neither is shadowcashcoin or paid shills or whoever the hell else you think is behind the FUD.
We weren't the ones who made the decisions that are driving your coin into the dirt.
Maybe it's just people pissed at the shady practices happening in crypto who don't mind calling it out.
Looks like the official XC thread was deleted? Anyone know the issue?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
hmmm. weird...
Quote
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
Official discussion should stay in the main coin thread in Announcements (Altcoins).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
Official discussion should stay in the main coin thread in Announcements (Altcoins).
Guess they gotta re open the original thread?
Ummm, I didn't touch anything.
Looks like the official XC thread was deleted? Anyone know the issue?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
hmmm. weird...
Quote
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
Official discussion should stay in the main coin thread in Announcements (Altcoins).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
Official discussion should stay in the main coin thread in Announcements (Altcoins).
Guess they gotta re open the original thread?
Looks like the official XC thread was deleted? Anyone know the issue?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--854023
Nah dan is fine, in the last 6 months I haven't seen someone so much the subject of slander and jealousy. Its like the few alt coin cloners got really really pissed off that they couldn't just clone their crap pump and dump anymore, when the race for new things like anon etc became common and dan comes along and pushes development of all coins forward in 6 months when the shit cloners were holding it back. And if blocknet gets out there first then supernet will having a go if they are not already...
Thats the only reason for why all this bullshit is out there in my opinion. I just want people to not lose sight of the goal.
Thats the only reason for why all this bullshit is out there in my opinion. I just want people to not lose sight of the goal.
Didnt I read somewhere that Dan will not be doing any code rewievs anymore? It looks like he has more or less taken over development of utiltiycoin, at least thats what the utilitydev has written.
Now, I followed all the drama here only losely, and I am convinced a good part of it is total nonsense, just fud. But I have followed utiltiy since the beginning, this coin is exactly what crypto should not be. Promises, insider trading, shiny graphics, absolutely nothing to show for, whitepapers that (if you actually read them) are 85% irrelevant stuff, which the dev admitted more or less. Huge volume right from the start with just a naked blockchain nothing else, the usual newbie accounts praising it, p+d groups desperately trying to hype it.
When that coin made it to Blocknet, I decided not to buy. Now Dan is more or less the dev. Maybe my view on utility is dead wrong, but this just looks horrible to me and for xc.
Now, I followed all the drama here only losely, and I am convinced a good part of it is total nonsense, just fud. But I have followed utiltiy since the beginning, this coin is exactly what crypto should not be. Promises, insider trading, shiny graphics, absolutely nothing to show for, whitepapers that (if you actually read them) are 85% irrelevant stuff, which the dev admitted more or less. Huge volume right from the start with just a naked blockchain nothing else, the usual newbie accounts praising it, p+d groups desperately trying to hype it.
When that coin made it to Blocknet, I decided not to buy. Now Dan is more or less the dev. Maybe my view on utility is dead wrong, but this just looks horrible to me and for xc.
Honestly, you betted on the wrong horse. Actually on further thought, I take that back, you betted on a donkey.
A goat.
...
This isn't a thread to call anyone names. ...
This isn't a thread to call anyone names. ...
Right.
Anyway No one is forcing you to invest into XC, sell -> move on -> prosper. What is the need of this thread?
XC benefits from Blocknet like a shop benefits from being inside a mall or an app to be in an app-store. Added exposure but also concentrated competition.
Which anon tech is best, XC or DRK? In my opinion XC from KimmyF's blockchain analysis seems to be very strong. The whole Masternode maybe in an equally trading volume scenario inferior to XC but because of the current trading volume of DRK it is strong enough. Time and FBI/CIA/NSA/DEA will tell.
What is really interesting is that this micro-universe of alt-coins is spawning so many competing different approaches, this will over time create value for people and further increase the paradigm shift in transactions.
Open-source, Delayed Open-Source, Closed Source if this matters to you don't invest? Release 1 is open which is emperical evidence of delayed open-source. People complained in the main thread when alts copied the rev 1 source. Currently blockchain analysis can reveal the strength of anon mixing and the market cap of coins. So aside from an ideological stance on opensource why is it needed right now and not later as shown on the road-map? Arguing, threatening and FUDding for it now seems childish or opportunistic at the best.
And XChat is working fine on windows. It is beta-software, so hick-ups on Apple client I would think can be expected. Being constructive about it rather than starting FUD storms would help your course more.
Did I call anyone a name? Perhaps your not aware of the ongoing XC goat joke. It's not a joke at anyone's expense. This thread was opened so anyone could discuss XC and BlockNet without fear of being banned or having their comments deleted. Serious investors look at ALL of the information available and not just the one sided press releases that come from the company itself.
Honestly, you betted on the wrong horse. Actually on further thought, I take that back, you betted on a donkey.
A goat.
...
This isn't a thread to call anyone names. ...
This isn't a thread to call anyone names. ...
Right.
Anyway No one is forcing you to invest into XC, sell -> move on -> prosper. What is the need of this thread?
XC benefits from Blocknet like a shop benefits from being inside a mall or an app to be in an app-store. Added exposure but also concentrated competition.
Which anon tech is best, XC or DRK? In my opinion XC from KimmyF's blockchain analysis seems to be very strong. The whole Masternode maybe in an equally trading volume scenario inferior to XC but because of the current trading volume of DRK it is strong enough. Time and FBI/CIA/NSA/DEA will tell.
What is really interesting is that this micro-universe of alt-coins is spawning so many competing different approaches, this will over time create value for people and further increase the paradigm shift in transactions.
Open-source, Delayed Open-Source, Closed Source if this matters to you don't invest? Release 1 is open which is emperical evidence of delayed open-source. People complained in the main thread when alts copied the rev 1 source. Currently blockchain analysis can reveal the strength of anon mixing and the market cap of coins. So aside from an ideological stance on opensource why is it needed right now and not later as shown on the road-map? Arguing, threatening and FUDding for it now seems childish or opportunistic at the best.
And XChat is working fine on windows. It is beta-software, so hick-ups on Apple client I would think can be expected. Being constructive about it rather than starting FUD storms would help your course more.
Jump to: