[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1284.

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 02:31:53 PM

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

Okay... but you still don't know who the original sender is, correct? Isn't that the point of anonymous transfers -- to mask the original sender's address?

Mixer identified.
Input of mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb == output from sender XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb will not be used again for any sender.

So XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw == XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb.
Compare output, count blocks, check explorer, input of XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb will be user for output for another sender.
Can find related output address.

That's what i am doing in analysis aka mapping.

braxx

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 11, 2014, 02:21:23 PM

new fuds are coming!

do you have whitepaper, open-source?

I'm just asking for some info..
I know DRK fanboys are also pretty trollish. I was looking for information because I'd expect it to be available.
If it isn't, that's fine, I just thought it would be.

I get why you guys are defensive...but geez.
Some of you already jumped on me because I'm always in the DRK thread...which is true.
Not hiding it.
Except, DRK was the first and only crypto I've ever participated in - the community was good, the profits were good and are good - so I stayed.
Trying to get more involved in stuff - wanted to research and see if I can see what chaeplin does on the same level ....

But this is definitely not a productive place for anyone from the outside.

sukottosan...
as a follower of the thread I can tell you there is a reason why the official xc-thread is now a moderated thread...
FUD & Trolling from dark on the original thread were tremendous... even official drk twitter account was used for trolling...

The guy's here are very carefull with newcomers who are suddenly coming over from dark...

sukottosan_d

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: battbot on June 11, 2014, 02:38:22 PM

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

Okay... but you still don't know who the original sender is, correct? Isn't that the point of anonymous transfers -- to mask the original sender's address?

Urm, that's the same as just generating a new bitcoin address and sending a transaction.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 02:39:29 PM

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

Thats not the Sender , AAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

of course you can find the sender address used by mixer as it has a direct link to the receiver

but the point is what is the original users sender address?

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

of course you can find the sender address used by mixer as it has a direct link to the receiver

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 02:08:31 PM

I think everyone needs to chill out and let people work together.

Whatever his motives, Chapelin is giving his time to this product, and we should be grateful for that.

At this point, with very few transaction, by scrubbing addresses and matching transactions in/out, he can find an address tied to the wallet.

So trying to say he is wrong - is wrong.

I would imagine if we treated him with a little more respect, he would probably do the same in return.

Once transactions pick up, it may be a lot harder to track those transactions, but by using his method - whatever it be, he most likely would be able to match the transaction, or at least narrow it down.

if the sent matches the received, it most likely will be able to be flagged if not by the eye, by a piece of software.

+1

hes is giving his time to discrediting a competition product to his investment with zero intention to help or ever say "yes it works". he never proves anything and you idiot still wanna be gratefull and give this guy more respect?
he has gotten way more respect than he deserves already. You don't get it . he doesn't want to help and he laughes his ass off to guys like you still beeing nice to him. its crazy

Nice to see some fighting spirit in this community finally from dev and some of the other guys.

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Dev can deny.

Here is point.

Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.

One time.

Every input to mixer got NEW address.

Matched.... Grin

Are you serious? Where did the mixer get the coins from? who clicked the send button?

From sender, with NEW address.

Okay... but you still don't know who the original sender is, correct? Isn't that the point of anonymous transfers -- to mask the original sender's address?

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250