[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1288.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:32:59 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:31:00 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:27:13 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:26:41 PM

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: greyskies on June 11, 2014, 01:33:26 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 01:31:41 PM

Who cares if he is legit. he is asking for something completely reasonable

You are stirring shit yourself with the way you phrase all your posts.

Seriously, why are you afraid of having the technology confirmed? If it works, it is a total win for XC - and I will be investing also!

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: greyskies on June 11, 2014, 01:32:10 PM

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today Cool

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.

greyskies

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 01:31:41 PM

Who cares if he is legit. he is asking for something completely reasonable

You are stirring shit yourself with the way you phrase all your posts.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:31:00 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:27:13 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:26:41 PM

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

greyskies

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today Cool

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:30:37 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:28:22 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

Just very peculiar, looking at your posts, you spend most your time on the DRK thread then come over here demanding answers..... Im sure you are 100% legit...

Who cares if he is legit. he is asking for something completely reasonable

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 01:30:46 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:29:01 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:28:22 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

100 XC's or the equivalent in BTC

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:27:13 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:26:41 PM

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:29:01 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:28:22 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:28:22 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

Just very peculiar, looking at your posts, you spend most your time on the DRK thread then come over here demanding answers..... Im sure you are 100% legit...

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:28:22 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

sukottosan_d

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 11, 2014, 01:25:14 PM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

greyskies

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

So funny how many people are trying to FUD this topic.

Dev has given a challenge which can't be cheated:

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:51:54 PM

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

Prove it or STFU

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

ATC, you will never please these jokers.. I would suggest if they don't want to now take part, we all just ignore them - including chaeplen or whatever he is called - you have made a reasonable offer and so far it has been just met with more FUD.. I think we can all see the hidden agenda here...

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:26:41 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:23:24 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:22:54 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:21:00 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:20:17 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:18:48 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:18:25 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 01:14:57 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 01:13:28 PM

Hey. bounty ?

I will give you hard link for this.
I got the link.

Once again. Prove up!

Put bounty, then I will.

there is NO bounty for that test, stop going in circles

I am saying hard link. not test.
If I provide hard link, what is bounty ?

100 XC's

It's design flaw. You have to fix it.

it doesn't impact REV2

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?

yes proof that there is connection from sender to receiver

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 11, 2014, 01:23:55 PM

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Exactly. All the rest of this back and forth is childish semantics

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250