This might be a good suggestion right now:
+1
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1287. (Read 1484248 times)
June 11, 2014, 01:48:43 PM
June 11, 2014, 01:47:59 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
Right. not from that transaction.
Used address by Mixer is related after all.
In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.
It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.
So I call it flaw.
Ah, so there is no provable direct link
thank you
1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine.
okay show me the proof of link?
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm
1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine.
June 11, 2014, 01:46:33 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....
Do you realize how many coins claim to either be working on or have anon functionality that works?? Crypto is full of scam artists and liars - anyone who isnt skeptical of every claim is just asking to be duped.
I understand you concerns but here is the thing:
1) The identity of the DEV is known which means that the risk is high for him
2) Any bugs that were reported were normally sorted out within the day
3) Question are constantly being answered
4) So far all developments that were promised have been on time
5) We listen to feedback and improving things as we go
All very good to hear. Just another part of the research I am doing.
June 11, 2014, 01:44:42 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....
Do you realize how many coins claim to either be working on or have anon functionality that works?? Crypto is full of scam artists and liars - anyone who isnt skeptical of every claim is just asking to be duped.
I understand you concerns but here is the thing:
1) The identity of the DEV is known which means that the risk is high for him
2) Any bugs that were reported were normally sorted out within the day
3) Question are constantly being answered
4) So far all developments that were promised have been on time
5) We listen to feedback and improving things as we go
June 11, 2014, 01:44:17 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain
I am giving you.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm
Multi input == same owner == same wallet.
In coinjoin, Multi input =/= same owner =/= same wallet.
I haven't reviewed those links, but multi-input == multiple different wallets from previous transactions
so your statement is incorrect but I will review the data shortly
Want this
June 11, 2014, 01:44:07 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain
I am giving you.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm
Multi input == same owner == same wallet.
In coinjoin, Multi input =/= same owner =/= same wallet.
This is the semantics thing I am talking about.
June 11, 2014, 01:44:03 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
Right. not from that transaction.
Used address by Mixer is related after all.
In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.
It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.
So I call it flaw.
Ah, so there is no provable direct link
thank you
1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine.
okay show me the proof of link?
June 11, 2014, 01:42:40 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
Right. not from that transaction.
Used address by Mixer is related after all.
In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.
It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.
So I call it flaw.
Ah, so there is no provable direct link
thank you
1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine.
June 11, 2014, 01:42:09 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain
I am giving you.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm
Multi input == same owner == same wallet.
In coinjoin, Multi input =/= same owner =/= same wallet.
I haven't reviewed those links, but multi-input == multiple different wallets from previous transactions
so your statement is incorrect but I will review the data shortly
June 11, 2014, 01:42:05 PM
I think ATC has been pretty open mate, and I think Chaeplens woeful response suggests he cannot link the transactions... I also think we get a hell of a lot more honesty here than anywhere else I have seen.
June 11, 2014, 01:40:35 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....
EDIT so you buy DRK even though masternode payments is broken - interesting.... And it is not even anonymous... Even more interesting...
I dont own any DRK. I am not sold on their technology either.
June 11, 2014, 01:39:57 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
Right. not from that transaction.
Used address by Mixer is related after all.
In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.
It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.
So I call it flaw.
Ah, so there is no provable direct link
thank you
June 11, 2014, 01:39:42 PM
Just to be sure even if chaeplin proves any solid links (which from what it seems is unlikely), this rev 1 as in BETA.
we are good now!
i can go sleep and wait XC to beat other coins.
June 11, 2014, 01:39:32 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain
I am giving you.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm
Multi input == same owner == same wallet.
In coinjoin, Multi input =/= same owner =/= same wallet.
June 11, 2014, 01:39:22 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....
Do you realize how many coins claim to either be working on or have anon functionality that works?? Crypto is full of scam artists and liars - anyone who isnt skeptical of every claim is just asking to be duped.
June 11, 2014, 01:38:29 PM
Just to be sure even if chaeplin proves any solid links (which from what it seems is unlikely), this rev 1 as in BETA.
June 11, 2014, 01:36:34 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....
EDIT so you buy DRK even though masternode payments is broken - interesting.... And it is not even anonymous... Even more interesting...
June 11, 2014, 01:36:28 PM
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?
yes
Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.
Problem is received coins are reused.
Proof :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7254769
I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Right ?
ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER
Right. not from that transaction.
Used address by Mixer is related after all.
In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.
It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.
So I call it flaw.
June 11, 2014, 01:35:41 PM
No-one proving any links.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today
Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.
Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.
I dont won DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in. The proof is very relevant to my interests.
you want proof? check the thread that was closed due to FUD, created by DKR member, for a COMPETELY STUPID MISTAKE OF HIS, making DKR official community managers taking advantage of it(twitter), thus plummeting price which stood at nearly 500k.
Thats ur proof.
June 11, 2014, 01:35:24 PM
This might be a good suggestion right now:
Jump to: