[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1291.

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:03:17 PM

Quote from: hoertest on June 11, 2014, 01:02:47 PM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 01:00:21 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really. No other coin is publicly testing.

we don't even have rev2 yet, atc always made clear that atm it was about proving a link and it never happened

plus his guess was wrong.. so enough already

Stop with the bullshit semantics. that "test" wasnt clearly laid out, and "no you didnt guess right" isnt anything other that you typing words.

Crypto is full of bullshit claims. prove up or shut up

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 01:03:34 PM

Quote from: KimmyF on June 11, 2014, 01:01:09 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

No, do not agree. Trust the Dev, he delivered so far and is at the moment the only one who knows his code well enough. Patients, that test will be there one day & Chaeplin is not the only one that needs to check it.

The developer claims the transactions cant be tracked. chaeplin claims he can track them.

One is right. One is wrong. We need to find out which. Trust the developer is bullshit when the claims are easily verifiable with proof. The best way to earn trust is to back it up with actual verifiable facts.

and he guess'd wrong on this 1 off transaction test..

Plus I didn't see any proof of anything

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: KimmyF on June 11, 2014, 01:01:09 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

No, do not agree. Trust the Dev, he delivered so far and is at the moment the only one who knows his code well enough. Patients, that test will be there one day & Chaeplin is not the only one that needs to check it.

The developer claims the transactions cant be tracked. chaeplin claims he can track them.

One is right. One is wrong. We need to find out which. Trust the developer is bullshit when the claims are easily verifiable with proof. The best way to earn trust is to back it up with actual verifiable facts.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: hoertest on June 11, 2014, 01:02:47 PM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 01:00:21 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really. No other coin is publicly testing.

we don't even have rev2 yet, atc always made clear that atm it was about proving a link and it never happened

plus his guess was wrong.. so enough already

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 01:00:21 PM

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really. No other coin is publicly testing.

we don't even have rev2 yet, atc always made clear that atm it was about proving a link and it never happened

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:00:00 PM

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 01:00:00 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:54:54 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 12:52:06 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 11:46:37 AM

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??

EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

Please do so. This back and forth is really annoying.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

No, do not agree. Trust the Dev, he delivered so far and is at the moment the only one who knows his code well enough. Patients, that test will be there one day & Chaeplin is not the only one that needs to check it.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 11, 2014, 12:59:53 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:54:54 PM

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

did you find out sender address before evtrmm post the address?

be straightforward

you still believe hes honest

JakeThePanda

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: acseric on June 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really. No other coin is publicly testing.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:54:54 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 12:52:06 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 11:46:37 AM

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??

EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:54:54 PM

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

did you find out sender address before evtrmm post the address?

be straightforward

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: greyskies on June 11, 2014, 12:56:02 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:51:54 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:50:27 PM

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

+1.

Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated.

+1

+2

+3 especially if you change conditions to chaps favour, plain stupid

acseric

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

greyskies

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:51:54 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:50:27 PM

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

+1.

Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated.

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 12:52:06 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 11, 2014, 11:46:37 AM

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??

EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

but now I try to unhash the MD5 and it can't Huh

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:51:54 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 12:50:27 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:49:25 PM

Quote from: policymaker on June 11, 2014, 12:48:55 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:47:06 PM

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

hard link in evtrmm test.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 12:51:01 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:49:25 PM

Quote from: policymaker on June 11, 2014, 12:48:55 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:47:06 PM

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this.

Comeone, we had a new release & ATC posted an TX. After marketing is in place & final release ready, start talking bounty. For now i hope we are all crypto enthousiast testing a new release

greyskies

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:49:25 PM

Quote from: policymaker on June 11, 2014, 12:48:55 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 12:47:06 PM

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Cheaplin is a big DRK supporter.

It's in his interests to try and create uncertainty.

Whenever the price moves up, DRK people get scared and start trying to spread FUD.

There is only one reason why they do this... they fear us Cool

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1291. (Read 1484248 times)