Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1294. (Read 1484248 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  



In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  

You are naive beyond believe. HE isn#t a critic he is an opponent and he is laughing his ass of that you all jump on his one liners that prove shit from day one the moment xc is gaining momentum again instead of concentrating on the positiv. every stupid rocket picture would be more constuctive in this situation than begging this asshole for another test
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
Well, just had my first xnode transactions come through Smiley

So, working for me on v42
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop. 
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Just wanted to let everyone know I am still around and we are working hard on the branding to go with the XC logo. While it takes some time to get it right, it will be worth it in the long run. Our goal is to provide the branding at a professional level that matches the work that atcsecure has been bringing to the table. 

It is great to be invested in a coin that delivers what they promise. I look forward to what the future holds for XC. 

best news of the day. this is getting really good.
hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

that's why i asked if someone looking for a transaction would have access to it, but nobody replied... if they can't have access to it, then it doesn't make sense to give it to chap.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it




I think we all need to face this test.

dev can give a md5(real_address_A + salt), salt can be any string and needn't post here. Just md5 hash C

the tester give address B

then dev give A and salt, the rest can verify it.

because if B=A, dev cannot find a A',  md5(A' + salt') = C

Hey, if chaeplin could trace the address, what we need to do is just fix it before the boat sails to the sea, isn't it?
sr. member
Activity: 519
Merit: 253
While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Just wanted to let everyone know I am still around and we are working hard on the branding to go with the XC logo. While it takes some time to get it right, it will be worth it in the long run. Our goal is to provide the branding at a professional level that matches the work that atcsecure has been bringing to the table. 

It is great to be invested in a coin that delivers what they promise. I look forward to what the future holds for XC. 
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1002
XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more.  Grin

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now. Grin

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

You can always wait to see if it goes down but I suggest you buy now and keep an eye on it, plus we been in the 90ks for to long even with some good progress from ATC. Lets not forget that right now there is no marketing done so when that kicks in we should make some progress price wise.  

no, you wrong. İ bought 400K, i bought 20K a lot. And i sold  145K a part now. if go down i buy again. if  go up, i sell again, you understand?
but wee need truth. No good time for buy, i dont like scam. is my opinion offcourse.

 
hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Blacksteel
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
Should we be worried about X11 mining in the near future and the XC price (let's say it will work) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7252546
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Expecting this to leg up again tonight... Great progress dev, thanks for the further updates today... Remember this is a young coin...
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it




Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.

This is just REV1 release, REV2 release will be more exciting.
Jump to: