[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1295.

brother3

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 500

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 11, 2014, 11:03:53 AM

Quote from: hunterwolf on June 11, 2014, 11:01:44 AM

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

your theory apply to any coin. btc ltc xc drk and any coin

Herd mentality...

Same with stocks too

Edit: I actually got 1K of XCs at ~ 93K level and people have always been buying - Otherwise we would not be at this level now

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:25:43 AM

I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.

did you see that, dev will disclose transaction detail after Chaeplin post address.

simple. if dev do not post transaction details after that. most ppl will lose patience and confidence.

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 11:18:13 AM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 11:17:19 AM

ATCSecure?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 11:09:50 AM

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'

and post result.

Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.

Profetu

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 11:08:23 AM

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:04:00 AM

snip

No, we can't move on. Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address. I won't stop until someone folds.

I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.

phosphorush

hero member

Activity: 503

Merit: 500

someone looking for a transaction would have the md5 or sha? if not that's part of the privacy features and should not be required to track it if it's possible to do so? Am I wrong? (I'm very ignorant on these things Cheesy

)

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 11:14:12 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on June 11, 2014, 11:11:28 AM

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer? if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

And every time I sent my XC, there is an error:

Code:

Error: The transaction was rejected. 
This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, 
such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and 
coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 11:17:19 AM

ATCSecure?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 11:09:50 AM

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'

and post result.

Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

JakeThePanda

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

ATCSecure?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 11:09:50 AM

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'

and post result.

Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: 520Bit on June 11, 2014, 11:11:28 AM

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer? if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

myelbow4

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

This is just the beginning. Prepare for .01

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

And every time I sent my XC, there is an error:

Code:

Error: The transaction was rejected. This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: KimmyF on June 11, 2014, 11:10:28 AM

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:04:00 AM

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

yes hear myself loud & clear, just go back from the given block, desc. order. Sounds easy enough for me. Not even needed to scan all addresses.
Also please read back about previous tests, MD5 was online

exactly...

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:04:00 AM

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

yes hear myself loud & clear, just go back from the given block, desc. order. Sounds easy enough for me. Not even needed to scan all addresses.
Also please read back about previous tests, MD5 was online

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mav137 on June 11, 2014, 11:08:59 AM

is there a bounty out for this at the moment? Could be a nice carrot..

if dev request.

jaft16

member

Activity: 88

Merit: 10

Quote from: hunterwolf on June 11, 2014, 11:01:44 AM

Quote from: provenceday on June 11, 2014, 10:39:53 AM

Quote from: Crindon on June 11, 2014, 10:35:12 AM

XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more. Grin

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now. Grin

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

You can always wait to see if it goes down but I suggest you buy now and keep an eye on it, plus we been in the 90ks for to long even with some good progress from ATC. Lets not forget that right now there is no marketing done so when that kicks in we should make some progress price wise.

mav137

full member

Activity: 163

Merit: 100

is there a bounty out for this at the moment? Could be a nice carrot..

JakeThePanda

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:04:00 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:55:54 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:45:16 AM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 10:42:33 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:32:46 AM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 10:09:42 AM

ATCSecure?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 10:05:52 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yes, which reminds me.

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 09:08:34 AM

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin. Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 08:34:25 AM

Mixer Test using v1.42

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address

here is another one....

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 10:40:26 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

Grin

First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers on earlier tests.

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

No, we can't move on. Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address. I won't stop until someone folds.

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Profetu on June 11, 2014, 11:04:00 AM

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

simple.

Chaeplin post address, and Dev will post transaction details. any thing wrong about this?

Profetu

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:55:54 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:45:16 AM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 10:42:33 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 10:32:46 AM

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 10:09:42 AM

ATCSecure?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 10:05:52 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yes, which reminds me.

Quote from: JakeThePanda on June 11, 2014, 09:08:34 AM

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin. Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 08:34:25 AM

Mixer Test using v1.42

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address

here is another one....

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Quote from: chaeplin on June 11, 2014, 10:40:26 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

Grin

First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers on earlier tests.

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: hunterwolf on June 11, 2014, 11:01:44 AM

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

your theory apply to any coin. btc ltc xc drk and any coin

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1295. (Read 1484248 times)