Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1293. (Read 1484248 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


Put an end to this.. People posting up "Tests" or "Challenges" need to know there is clearly a difference between "Tell me the FROMADDRESS" and "Show me a link back to the FROMADDRESS".

If you are going to offer "Tests/Challenges" then do it right. Run the sendfrommixer 10 times, each from a different sentfrom address to the same sendto address with the same amount. Then ask which address is it for 1 of the 10 specific transactions. (This is needed as with so few mixed transactions going on right now, you can massively cut down the "guess work" when you know the amount sent.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.


agreed, that wasn't a test I put forward

here is one


XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk

Tell me the source


hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


+1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once.

We aren't backstabbing anything.  ATCSecure put a test out there.  I'm not looking for a pump and dump here. If you are worried about what you are going to find out from a test then you should sell.  You are obviously here just for a higher price so you can sell now.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


First, say address is correct ?


I will show you hard evidence.

Design flaw.


Is there bounty ?


I don't know the address

and no there is not a bounty for that test
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


+1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two


First, say address is correct ?


I will show you hard evidence.

Design flaw.


Is there bounty ( BTC ) ?
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100
Wow. Such community...

MD5 is just to prove a string. I doesn't have to be that, it could be an uploaded image with a time stamp, or a zip protected file. To claim he reversed MD5 is utter nonsense. You can MD5 argrfz-address-fdfgg and that will return a completely different hash.

I am really embarrassed by the people's attitude in this thread. I guess it's human nature after all.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Over 20 BTC worth of buy orders in the last 5 min Shocked
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?

Why do I have a feeling he got it right?   Undecided

answer pls
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?

Why do I have a feeling he got it right?   Undecided
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?
hero member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 500
BintexFutures
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

no.

The MD5 is like a sealed envelope with the address in it, so that when it is revealed we know if the guess is correct or not, its that simple.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
If Chaeplin is willing to be more co-operative, I will personally give him 1 DRK, or 10 DOGE, whichever is worth more in 1 months time.

here we go again, nice people desease
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
If Chaeplin is willing to be more co-operative, I will personally give him 1 DRK, or 10 DOGE, whichever is worth more in 1 months time.
hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  



In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

+1
Jump to: