Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1292. (Read 1484248 times)
June 11, 2014, 12:52:08 PM
Give him a boumty if what he claims is not true, no need to fear and all is cleared...
June 11, 2014, 12:52:06 PM
https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742
zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included
"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2
---FROMADDRESS??
EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.
zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included
"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2
---FROMADDRESS??
EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.
PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction
June 11, 2014, 12:51:54 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD
Then bounty ?
bounty for what?
prove to me who sent the payment to
XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k
and you can get a bounty
June 11, 2014, 12:51:01 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD
Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this.
June 11, 2014, 12:50:32 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
its the same talk all over again and he never proved anything
June 11, 2014, 12:50:27 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD
Then bounty ?
June 11, 2014, 12:50:14 PM
for who know better this coin, do you think it could have the same end like the DRK?
I mean there're only 5.5 Milion coin, and it could give to the money the possibility to gain a very high price.
I bought some when it was at 210k, and now I'm considering to take some coin at 140k, what do you believe is the destiny of this coin in the next few weeks?
I mean there're only 5.5 Milion coin, and it could give to the money the possibility to gain a very high price.
I bought some when it was at 210k, and now I'm considering to take some coin at 140k, what do you believe is the destiny of this coin in the next few weeks?
June 11, 2014, 12:49:25 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD
June 11, 2014, 12:48:55 PM
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
June 11, 2014, 12:48:47 PM
June 11, 2014, 12:47:06 PM
June 11, 2014, 12:44:39 PM
maybe we need a large scope test.
June 11, 2014, 12:44:18 PM
June 11, 2014, 12:43:39 PM
Where is his answer?
June 11, 2014, 12:41:21 PM
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now
and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two
Put an end to this.. There is clearly a difference between "Tell me the FROMADDRESS" and "Show me a link back to the FROMADDRESS".
If you are going to offer "Tests" Then run the sendfrommixer 10 times, each from a different sentfrom address to the same sendto address with the same amount. Then ask which address is it for 1 of the 10 specific transactions.
YES DONE
received payment @ - XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk
June 11, 2014, 12:41:12 PM
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now
and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
just reading through now...
June 11, 2014, 12:40:40 PM
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now
and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two
+1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once.
We aren't backstabbing anything. ATCSecure put a test out there.
Actually I didn't put that test out there, that was done by evtrmm
So far nobody has provided the source address for any test I have done
June 11, 2014, 12:40:34 PM
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now
and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two
As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.
+1
June 11, 2014, 12:40:13 PM
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now
and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me
evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.
All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two
First, say address is correct ?
I will show you hard evidence.
Design flaw.
Is there bounty ?
I don't know the address
and no there is not a bounty for that test
I am saying hard evidence. hard link.
June 11, 2014, 12:40:01 PM
where is @evtrmm?
reveal the address now
reveal the address now
Jump to: