Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1443. (Read 1484248 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
wait for the next update from dev,

after Anon feature work smoothly and Xnode also works smoothly, everything will change.

+1 I have no doubt at all about this Smiley
hero member
Activity: 573
Merit: 500
need help to sync after updating;  its stuck at 203 blocks missing;

addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=162.243.109.24

This from wallet:

blocks" : 23288,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 5205.79639598,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 40851533731,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false

Get info;

"version" : "v0.9.1.5x11-coin-1.0",
"protocolversion" : 71002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
wait for the next update from dev,

after Anon feature work smoothly and Xnode also works smoothly, everything will change.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?

If you lie, it doesn't make him wrong Wink

But the point is you can't prove that I'm lying.  If you were able to prove I was lying, then you truly cracked the anonymity feature.

Your basing the concept of an anonymous transaction on the idea that the tracking party would even need verification from you in the first place. What if they never ask if they are right or not?

A third party with no interaction with yourself would not be inclined to ask you if they were right or not. The NSA or other Acronym Agency is not going to ask you if they guessed it correctly or not. At which point, the burden of proof would be on you. IE: Prove it isn't the address.

Again, lying does not change the validity of the guess. It just makes you a liar.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?

If you lie, it doesn't make him wrong Wink

But the point is you can't prove that I'm lying.  If you were able to prove I was lying, then you truly cracked the anonymity feature.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.



we were looking for the sender address, not receiver address.

Then he did just the inverse. Goes back a few blocks looking for the same amount. If you guys want I can repeat what he did.
That sound constructive, would be great.
ACTSECURE was already setting up a new wallet for another test, maybe you two can catch up.
Please, work together.

hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?

If you lie, it doesn't make him wrong Wink
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
When is the approximate date for rev 2 release? Just want to know when to have funds and BTC ready
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Omg, ofc you can get it by guessing or just looking out there for that X transaction when there are not enough transactions

Anyway...


At the end of the day, if just "guessing" is enough to sidestep the current mixing process, it isn't very anonymous is it?

Don't get me wrong, I am a believer in the XC platform, and am sure ATC will get things sorted out in later revisions. I just don't know why everyone saw the need to jump down Chaeplin's throat when it was the community and the dev that asked him to do it in the first place. Anyway, I am done.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?
Jump to: