[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1447.

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

I have edited this.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: evtrmm on June 03, 2014, 11:08:54 AM

Quote from: Grifftech on June 03, 2014, 11:03:03 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard ..... Roll Eyes

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

at least someone is vs everyone praising it when there are obvious holes. those holes are not obvious to all, but we need people like him to help out.

remember, it is not about coin vs coin, it is about moving cryptos forward.

exactly, you don't have to like him or the arrogance he is showing now, if he doesn't prove the link he wants to feel great about himself or he simply can't prove it, but once guys like him can't find anything you know its bulletproof, dev seems more than capable to life up to the task

Grifftech

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: evtrmm on June 03, 2014, 11:08:54 AM

Quote from: Grifftech on June 03, 2014, 11:03:03 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard ..... Roll Eyes

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

at least someone is vs everyone praising it when there are obvious holes. those holes are not obvious to all, but we need people like him to help out.

remember, it is not about coin vs coin, it is about moving cryptos forward.

What obvious holes? He refuses to back up his statements, until then it is just pure shit, plain and simple

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on June 03, 2014, 11:10:06 AM

You are ignored.

BADASS

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Theirs only one coin I give a hoot for and that's our XC!

studio1one

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 500

BintexFutures

I think chances are that Chaeplin vetted the blocks but his ego is so big he wanted to show he had more knowledge of how it works than he does.

If he actually was smart enough to spot a direct block chain link he would post it. As it stands he's just lucky there are not many transactions.

SpringfieldM1A

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 550

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

What is the purpose of opting for a design test when you don't want to share your results? It's the same as being a test driver saying "yeah well there is something wrong with this car, but I am not going to tell you what exactly because you as a designer already know it"

Your attempts at FUD are laughable and pathetic.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: Grifftech on June 03, 2014, 11:03:03 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard ..... Roll Eyes

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

at least someone is vs everyone praising it when there are obvious holes. those holes are not obvious to all, but we need people like him to help out.

remember, it is not about coin vs coin, it is about moving cryptos forward.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

I appreciate all the feedback, and if we see the proof from chaeplin I will review and make sure the issue is resolved in the next release...

ATCSECURE

Slaxt

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Gone......

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

and another hour wasted while we could have done greater things for this community

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

That's design flaw.

Splitted tx with one rx address ?

ethereal73

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

Come one, no need for this!

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

YES and that INPUT has NO connection to the OUTPUT - and if your saying otherwise, I would like to see proof to backup your statement

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 11:02:04 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

studio1one

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 500

BintexFutures

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

and I was warming to you as well.

Oh well. I'll put you back in the troll box.

SpringfieldM1A

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 550

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

Without proof you are merely spreading false rumours, I really thought you were seriously testing the functionality of XC which would have been good for the infrastructure. Sadly you trolled everybody by making them believe you actually found something. Shame on you for perpetuating the endless fudding that goes on in this thread. For the record, I made screenshots of your posts so that when you were to spread fud in other channels it will easily be thwarted by showing your poor attempt at discrediting XC without anything to back those claims.

Grifftech

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard ..... Roll Eyes

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

Cool post it so if you are here to help please.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM