Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1449. (Read 1484248 times)

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

At least 4 confirmation needed.


5 of 6 now

probably stupid being that I sent the coins form that address.....  bah.

As tx is given, to easy.


Used XM4f4GbzaCnMphTKitAYMSX8vdkUPrwYuQ
change XUUgYHRfqd3bcNRLqgHKvhKBD3HnjGuTTL
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
 What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix

I see, so I will wait for v1.37 to do further test. I reserved 10 XCs to do this kind of test. Keep moving, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
split the outputs randomly

Is this the multi-path part of the protocol?


it is the first part, the 2nd part is using multiple mixers going through another setup of multiple mixers, it will use a TTL type metric, so you can specify how many hops (mixers) to use

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250



I just did a test


http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XTiTRPu5dJgUou217i8ZZJukD1QQHA5Uhm


thats the receiver address, tell me the sender's wallet address



You use same amount for test.

Can't tell. 2 address popup.



can you reveal the source wallet or not?

Do you want change address ? XYqv6iJxvBE9sEwVeutn3Lw3yWCv5vKb8R
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
split the outputs randomly

Is this the multi-path part of the protocol?
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

At least 4 confirmation needed.


5 of 6 now

probably stupid being that I sent the coins form that address.....  bah.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
 What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
/quote]

You use same amount for test.

Can't tell. 2 address popup.



post the 2 address's
Oh my bad.. Just one

XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn


This one also used XXPwPgua2u7Psa6PCR6noHR7XrsyRVfh1x

But main is XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn

thats not the address I used

Could you post the used address, and do the test with chaeplin again please.

I'm setting up a fresh wallet for a new test.. will post the TX ID# in a few minutes for this test
[/quote]

Please post the used address, Chaeplin should be able to verified it the way he want.

member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10

I agree 100%, I want this kind of feedback and data to resolve any issues, we need real world testing to improve the product

Is there a specific area in which you most need testing?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.


this detail would reveal source but not destination

but the key question is documenting that this transaction is linked on the block chain, from A to B to C - I haven't seen any proof of that
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

At least 4 confirmation needed.
hero member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 500
BintexFutures
I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

People like you harm the coin more than people like him.

lol

whats funny?

Chaeplin is doing useful testing. You are giving out abuse.

Who is helping and who is hindering.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ?
After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty.
Lets wait and see IF this is true at all Smiley

No luck, pattern.

XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine.

Sent 0.1 XC to XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 by sendfrommixer

Code:
sendfrommixer mixer XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 0.1

Please find out what is the sent address? If you need more information, let me know.

I will go to have a shower and check your result later.

@chaeplin, could you please reveal my sender address to your address XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8?



XGi2KfLRLLMergb2iepfdY4QUcWBnKnfEZ


XGi2KfLRLLMergb2iepfdY4QUcWBnKnfEZ is the correct sender address I used.

@atcsecure, do you need more details to find the root cause?
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100

No problem.  Just keep in mind that the metrics will improve as the sample size grows.
sr. member
Activity: 261
Merit: 250
Seriously guys. Let them do the test without the bs. This is needed.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Would you rather know sooner or later?

I'm still undecided.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

unbelievably clever to offend People trying to verify your code.. please don't do that, it only hurts the community
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

People like you harm the coin more than people like him.

lol
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.
Jump to: