[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1448.

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:58:39 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:56:48 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

Quote

are you seeing a direct link o~~n the block chain?"~~

I use block explorer.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

an updated release will resolve the output not being split, but I also want to see if there is an actual link on the blockchain between wallet A and C.. so the release covers any other potential gaps

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:56:48 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

Rraider

full member

Activity: 180

Merit: 100

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:56:48 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard ..... Roll Eyes

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:54:27 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

BADASS

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

https://i.imgur.com/ujB8qYz.gif

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:54:10 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:47:53 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:40:01 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix

I would not only split the output between several xnodes but also split the input too. So allowing the total amount to be sent to multiple addresses and not fix it just to one. This will exponentially increase the difficulty of running such an analysis with every address used to the point of unfeasability and statistical true anonymity. Another feature would be to relay from xnode to xnode for a random or user selected amount of blocks depending on how "much" privacy they want.

I am not vetting. Grin

So what are you doing?
The only link I can see is the total sum.

Design flaw...

it is not a design flaw, the code is already in place to split transactions as it is done on the inputs, the function just isn't being called at the moment

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: vemdoctor9 on June 03, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

This coin is crap. sorry.

Well crap on the internet is like $20 so I would be more than happy if our coin starts selling for that much.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:53:10 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: chaeplin on June 03, 2014, 10:47:53 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:40:01 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix

I would not only split the output between several xnodes but also split the input too. So allowing the total amount to be sent to multiple addresses and not fix it just to one. This will exponentially increase the difficulty of running such an analysis with every address used to the point of unfeasability and statistical true anonymity. Another feature would be to relay from xnode to xnode for a random or user selected amount of blocks depending on how "much" privacy they want.

I am not vetting. Grin

So what are you doing?
The only link I can see is the total sum.

Design flaw...

provenceday

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

how about we set a public test day when next version update?

community can have a big bonus for this, such as 10BTC or 5K XC coin?

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:52:16 AM

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

yetiripper

full member

Activity: 250

Merit: 100

The Future Of Work

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:44:25 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 03, 2014, 10:42:24 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:40:01 AM

split the outputs randomly

Is this the multi-path part of the protocol?

it is the first part, the 2nd part is using multiple mixers going through another setup of multiple mixers, it will use a TTL type metric, so you can specify how many hops (mixers) to use

My dick came and a huge fountain formed

In that order?

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

studio1one

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 500

BintexFutures

I guess at this stage I won't bother doing another test until code is updated.

studio1one

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 500

BintexFutures

Quote from: vemdoctor9 on June 03, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

This coin is crap. sorry.

oops,

missed that post when I posted my last comment.

Oh well, there's always one.

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: atcsecure on June 03, 2014, 10:40:01 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix

I would not only split the output between several xnodes but also split the input too. So allowing the total amount to be sent to multiple addresses and not fix it just to one. This will exponentially increase the difficulty of running such an analysis with every address used to the point of unfeasability and statistical true anonymity. Another feature would be to relay from xnode to xnode for a random or user selected amount of blocks depending on how "much" privacy they want.

I am not vetting. Grin

studio1one

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 500

BintexFutures

just home.

Good stuff.

Nice to see people being proactive and positive and not just shouting abuse and opinion.

vemdoctor9

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

This coin is crap. sorry.

PeterPalmBeach

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

SellALL, BuyBTC

XC officially listed on http://cryptocoinstats.com

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1448. (Read 1484248 times)