Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 404. (Read 1484189 times)

ok, apologies if I misunderstood or misconstrued you

I don't wanna quote mecc for the viewing pleasure of forum threads but basically what I think too. Stop being needy and whiny like a bunch of babies. I think sometimes XC thread is way too polite for certain kind of people. It's like an open invitation for the said people who refuse to accept terms with reality.

Dan alone is the real reason why we are in the top 15 market cap. He knows what he's doing. Next time before doubting his abilities and feeling entitled that he owes you, remind yourself that you're no different than those p&ds people who will gtfo the very first moment they make a decent gain. Do we really need those short sighted investors? No, thank you. Better get rid of them right now.

+1. Not to mention, once the p&d's come down xc can snatch up any talent that was on the team.

Nope.   There are 5 inputs (4 of them went to zero balance).  18 different outputs has received 10 XC...  so,  there are 90 possible guesses just from that alone.   So, you have like a 1 out of 90 chances to blindly guess right.  LOL.

I don't like posting, but some of the nonsense going on here is bothering me.

Let's throw out the comparisons, analogies, and whatever story you got. You need to look at the main picture. What's going on? Look at the market. It's shit. Mining is worse than ever. Wallets infected with malware becoming more common. Uninspiring coins cashing in on the latest trend, well that's the same shit different day deal. It used to be anon, multisig, now it's anon + market, smart contracts, magical tech. MintPal used to have 2,000+ btc daily volume traded. Bittrex, still p&d central. Most are just uninspiring p&d coins that get left for dead, repeat ad nauseam. ICO/IPOs end up being a quick P&D with no future. The point? This is how money leaves the alt scene. Confidence dwindles.

XC was once labeled as a Fedora clone hack job. The dev a scammer. This was only a few months ago. Now he's getting paid by other developers/communities to verify their goods. It shows ATC as a businessman, XC as a leader. Who do you want in charge of development if you want to make money?

So what if a new developer on the scene wants to push out innovative ideas and useful features? He can inspire confidence by submiting proof of code. Clean, legit, innovative, certified to fly. Otherwise you get paired up with the bad of the cryptoworld. Look at every new announcement thread. POD! POD! POD!, what's the points of this shitcoin? You can open source all your goodies, but you know what happens after that. People use your tech, don't even credit you, run a quick p&d and leave the scene worse off. Case in point, Shadow with all its clones. These reviews help the entire alt scene.

An interesting thing to note. Supercoin devs said in their whitepaper a long time ago (phase one era) that Cloak had no idea what trustless meant. If Cloak had proof of code done would they have even gotten pumped? We saw the results of their 3rd party audit and its effect. How many people got burned on this? How many of them are bitter and are trolling other threads?

As for development on XC. Solidify the foundation. This means bulletproofing network, security and privacy features. Have you paid attention to some of the issues that have popped up for other coins? Network and security issues. If only they had someone on their team who was an expert in these fields. People already forgot about the ad hosting collab service. This is a ground breaking idea and it's just the beginning. I don't like coin hyping so I will stop there. If you feel depressed over XC's market, just look at Dan's linkedin.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82

As for the fudders, let them eat stake.

I put a tiny buy at 0.00127400 on Mint and a bunch of bots (I assume) cut ahead of me. I'll play your game

Such a poor analogy. You are comparing a car company, which is a profit seeking venture with shareholders witha community based venture that will eventually be an open source project for the benefit of anyone, not just shareholders.

Can you see the very vast difference between a company with shareholders and a profit motive and something like Bitcoin?

Bitcoin or XC is very very different to a profit seeking corporation

I'd strongly disagree. We have possibly the hardest working fastest developer around. He has been fantastic. But he owes us nothing.
Dan, can do whatever he wants as far as I'm concerned. And I'm not concerned, at all. There are many reasons I like this coin and one is that I believe that Dan genuinely believes in what he is doing.
I think he will keep working away because of this, but he can take as much time off as he wants to.

bump for those that missed it earlier

I know, right? Me too. Must be all the buying pressure.

Thanks Arlyn!

why ppl complain about legitimacy of this great innovation?

this is the safe heaven of alt coins. just be patient.

With so much drama in xcurrency
It's so hard to find a place to put my btc
but I, some how some way
keep comin' up with money for XC, like, every single day. 

ASAP. It's my job. Just so much going on here.

It's easy to draft, but takes hours to convert to BBcode.

While we're on the topic of my agenda:
- There will be a few press releases this week unveiling new features of Rev 2
- On Monday we release the final Rev 2 update, not Rev 2.5
- There will be other news on Monday too.




P.S. For the sake of those still confused about Rev 2: we released trustless mixing on 7/7/14, and since then have been building out the privacy functions. Monday is the final update to Privacy Mode before we move on to the UI and the distributed content delivery service.

Anytime. ;-)

Anyone know when the timelines will be updated on the OP?

Thank you sir. :-)

Let it not be said that XC hasn't performed well during dump season:


Sep 2:  Top Weekly Performers:
@XCurrency +3.97%
@SaveCoinDev -0.34%
@Bitcoin -0.34%
@Feathercoin -0.51%
http://goo.gl/jBCXam   #xcurrency
 

XC has also consistently been the top quarterly performer.

I'll give you one thing synechist. You are the king of rhetoric.

 Don't take it the wrong way. It is a talent.

+1. Spot on.

Your scenario here is not analogous to the world of cryptocurrency:
1) Market players are not highly visible
2) Scams are rife
3) New projects continually bring new innovations to the market

None of these apply to the world of cars.

I think it was Hoertest who summarised XC's advantage here very well:
- Supporters of other coins get to hear about XC. (1)
- XC gets to establish itself as the paragon of security and legitimacy. (2)
- XC gets to see every piece of new code that comes out, and benefit from it if there's anything useful there (3)


So do you get it now?

Also, a lot of the criticism of these reviews is completely cockeyed. Investors want Dan to focus purely on XC so that they get a return on investment? No:
- XC is already the technology leader. New tech from Dan isn't going to magically transform XC's value. A return on investment has to do with real-world market adoption, not some quick pump. This has been XC's plan from the beginning. Be patient.
- Dan himself wants a return on investment more than anyone else, and holds more XC than most. So what possible incentive would he have to not work toward this end?


Think about it. Code reviews really make sense, for the reasons given above.