Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 608. (Read 1484248 times)

Oblox we've chatted about this issue before.

Your issue is related to Privacy Mode. This is a Rev 2 issue.

At the moment we're dealing with XChat. After this, we move onto the final Rev 2 release.

So Dan is being gracious in working with you to fix an issue that is not only isolated but also not at the top of XC's task list.

Please drop this. It's been discussed before.

...or I'm the only one that has openly posted about it.

...or I'm one of the people that actually tried private transfers instead of taking everyone's word that it works.

Regardless, it should be fixed. Perhaps it's an easy fix, in which case, great, it shouldn't take long at all. So far, Dan has been stumped what is going on so take it for what it's worth. Testing bugs should be considered a good thing in crypto as it leads to a solid end-product.

wtf are you people talking about?

No, that is why I explicitly made the point that you are the only one.  At the company I work for, the reported bugs escalate as more hits are gained.  It is the only way to effectively develop software.

If more people were to complain about the same issue you are having, it is only logical that the priority would increase.

Pft, I haven't sold a single coin since I've accumulated my position, although I have moved 20k of my coins to MP in the event I need to hedge my exposure. You probably should play detective elsewhere.

I found the large holder keeping the price suppressed. Unhappy they can't get the support needed to fix a problem not many are having. They are making sure no one else benefits from the coin till their issue is resolved.

I didn't say he was going to prioritize someone else's code over fixing the problem with me. I just said I'd rather see it happen that any sort of additional peer reviews be done after the coin works 100%. Simple as that. The sole reason I invested in XC was for the private transfers and so far I don't have that. I like the fact that the team is going the platform route and not focusing 100% on just private transfers, but still, the initial investment was for that particular feature. Needy or not, it's an advertised feature that lacks 100% functionality and voicing my concern to have it fixed shouldn't be ostracized. I'm not saying it has to be fixed this weekend, but I'd like to think that this afternoon's testing session will finally yield some sort of result to resolve this. I'm continually shocked at how the community seeming turns on another investor who has a broken feature that is advertised as working. Working for 99% is not 100% last I checked. I may be the only one, who knows. I'm at least speaking up and voicing my concern because everyone keeps saying private transfers work and from my eyes, they do not. You should be happy when it works for everyone. XC currently has such a small footprint, what happens when more people start trying it out and run into the same issue I am having. Are you really going to say it's low priority then?

Basically, Dan has so far funded a lot of things out of his own pocket like Xcaht development. We want to prevent converting the xc into fiat as much as possible.

I see your point, but i think the team has earned enough trust so that we can be more than confident that they will find the right way and balance. Sometimes it s a thin line between a justifiable demand and the screaming of a spoiled brat.  

How do you know he is going to review their code before he helps you this afternoon?

You are coming across as extremely needy, IMO.  You are the only one that seems to have this problem.  I think Dan is being very gracious by spending some one on one time with you to try and figure it out.  I would find it surprising if Dan would give priority to another coin over his own project.

In my eyes, since you are the only one who can reproduce the bug, it is a relatively low priority.  Instead of complaining, you should be commending.  

Considering on multiple occasions of previous testing attempts with Dan he has had to delay or push back our testing period because he didn't have the time, I would say if he has the time available to test someone else's code, he should have the time to test with me to resolve an issue that affects 100% functionality of the coin he, himself, is developing.

There should be some things that are up to the dev to decide, don t you think? Let s not become too demanding, neither concerning Dan nor the market situation.

I'm not talking about previous execution with keycoin, I'm talking about making our coin work 100% before peer-reviewing other coins. If there is available time to help others, great, but it shouldn't come at the expense of neglecting existing bugs with our own coin.

I think he learned from keycoin and will execute it a little differently. also not all devs are as shady as keycoin and don't give credit.
Perhaps finally people will realise that its a wise idea to buy the coin of the dev everybody is running to for validation.
Arlyn should look over it since its a public statement and he really knows how to find a middle ground of objective review and still showing superiority of the own project without sounding arrogant.

Support and resistance gonna converge not too long from now 

Wow! I'm sure it does. I remember you writing that you had a significant amount of pre-mine set aside for PR and marketing. It's new news to me if that is not the case. I don't know if you will be able to raise enough funding through donations alone to launch a proper advertising campaign. (As highlighted on the latest road map). I am trusting that you have a plan and know what your doing. ;-)

like a mountain.

I'd still rather see him focus on making private transfers work for everyone first as it's a core feature of XC before further reviewing other coin's code. But my bias is obvious being that it doesn't work for me. Dan and I are going to do some testing later this afternoon so hopefully we narrow down why it's not working the way it should.

A good thing in my opinion, hope to have the same profit % as with another coin he reviewed

I just wrote a message with the old wallet, thinking about could be great to sent a message pushing enter instead of the SEND botton, and here you are in the new wallet you send with enter.
Good one!