So our Mintpal XMR's gone or not? 
Is there anyone that withdrew their XMR succesfully? There was some speculation bytheway that Mintpal's XMR were sold off on poloniex.
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1336. (Read 4670643 times)
October 20, 2014, 11:34:43 AM
Is there anyone that withdrew their XMR succesfully? There was some speculation bytheway that Mintpal's XMR were sold off on poloniex.
October 20, 2014, 10:46:12 AM
So our Mintpal XMR's gone or not?
October 20, 2014, 10:06:02 AM
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
So what's your point? Leaving aside moral matters.
I double resistant's post. Running monero pool is very expensive and such crappy software made it much more expensive. I didn't count ignorants who running a pool and can't understand a difference between valid share or trusted one.
Many legit miners still mining this coin and it's not good for everyone if they will be screwed by fake PoW and loose money. I know some miners in person and I feel some responsibility.
October 20, 2014, 10:00:40 AM
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
So what's your point? Leaving aside moral matters.
I suppose you could classify stealing shares (and therefore XMR) from other miners as immoral, and therefore if morality is no concern for you then feel free to use it and accept the consequences. Personally I would be concerned about using software with a demonstrably immoral history unless I could validate the source very carefully.
October 20, 2014, 09:51:04 AM
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
So what's your point? Leaving aside moral matters.The point is that those duplicate-shares are spamming pools with crap data which has a cost for us pool owner (high server load) + those fake-shares are counted as legit (trust-exploit) on some pool (not on my pool, I just ban them) which steal the hashrate from legit miners (number of blocks found is the same but fake-shares take a % of gain from other miners).
October 20, 2014, 09:45:05 AM
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
So what's your point? Leaving aside moral matters.
October 20, 2014, 07:25:52 AM
Guys, it seems some suspicious russian proprietary miner kachur is very popular already. I'd like to say that this mining software proven SCAM. I banned several miners after I found duplicate share vulnerability and all miners spotted in logs with attempt to submit duplicate share were using this software. Stay away from not trusted developers, there is no even BCT thread for this miner.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
...
Duplicate share: {"id":"779749578400515","job_id":"394227879843674","nonce":"804f3800","result":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"} from 4
...
Now that's a proof.
Good work.
October 20, 2014, 07:07:48 AM
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
...
Duplicate share: {"id":"779749578400515","job_id":"394227879843674","nonce":"804f3800","result":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"} from 4
...
..... 1.4 (faster+ low fee than Claymore 9.1) came out week ago...i suggest you to use 1.1 or 1.0 its more funn 
Funny how ignorants will stay till death on their own. Initial idea was kminer testing against exploiting pools. I did it. It does not matter what future versions does.
October 20, 2014, 07:04:16 AM
Guys, it seems some suspicious russian proprietary miner kachur is very popular already. I'd like to say that this mining software proven SCAM. I banned several miners after I found duplicate share vulnerability and all miners spotted in logs with attempt to submit duplicate share were using this software. Stay away from not trusted developers, there is no even BCT thread for this miner.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
...
Duplicate share: {"id":"779749578400515","job_id":"394227879843674","nonce":"804f3800","result":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"} from 4
...
..... 1.4 (faster+ low fee than Claymore 9.1) came out week ago...i suggest you to use 1.1 or 1.0 its more funn One question..is it came from one miner (account) or from 4-5-10...
October 20, 2014, 06:05:22 AM
Guys, it seems some suspicious russian proprietary miner kachur is very popular already. I'd like to say that this mining software proven SCAM. I banned several miners after I found duplicate share vulnerability and all miners spotted in logs with attempt to submit duplicate share were using this software. Stay away from not trusted developers, there is no even BCT thread for this miner.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
If you are trusted person, we can test this miner in isolation, I'll run test pool and can give you early binaries, because after vulnerability fix they probably deleted duplicate submission functionality.
Just did isolated test using latest pool software and 1.2b version of this miner. Duplicates spotted in logs immediately:
...
Duplicate share: {"id":"779749578400515","job_id":"394227879843674","nonce":"804f3800","result":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"} from 4
...
October 20, 2014, 04:18:06 AM
My wife and I are going to be in LA next week, and I'd like to have a little meetup for any Moneroers in the area on Wednesday, October 29th.
Details and discussion can be had here: https://forum.monero.cc/14/events/70/fluffypony-s-los-angeles-monero-meetup
Details and discussion can be had here: https://forum.monero.cc/14/events/70/fluffypony-s-los-angeles-monero-meetup
October 20, 2014, 04:09:12 AM
forum.monero.cc won't allow me to login, due to inactivity. it would be nice to have a contact link on the front page.
Due to inactivity? Is is about the Web of Trust part? If yes then you can just skip it entirely (and complete it later)i registered when the site opened. i logged in once or twice and have been offline since. now login attempts report that my account is inactive and refuse me.
We don't have any functionality that would do that, but I see your account is marked as unconfirmed. Did you receive the email confirmation? Use this: https://forum.monero.cc/user/resend-activation and then you can reactivate it, and we'll check what caused you to become "unactivated" (probably someone fiddling on the forum administrator side)
October 20, 2014, 03:37:01 AM
@correosdelbosque, do you need any help setting things up like wallet, or registering on a reputated exchange website?
just feel free to ask.
BTW: when I do see the pools listed, the one I use is missing (does 25% of net hash, it's the one where the attack packages been injected). Any reason against re-adding?
just feel free to ask.
BTW: when I do see the pools listed, the one I use is missing (does 25% of net hash, it's the one where the attack packages been injected). Any reason against re-adding?
October 19, 2014, 11:57:42 PM
October 19, 2014, 10:46:13 PM
forum.monero.cc won't allow me to login, due to inactivity. it would be nice to have a contact link on the front page.
Due to inactivity? Is is about the Web of Trust part? If yes then you can just skip it entirely (and complete it later)i registered when the site opened. i logged in once or twice and have been offline since. now login attempts report that my account is inactive and refuse me.
October 19, 2014, 04:17:50 PM
Do we really need to have email confirmations to make an account?
If you care about anonymity that much, use a disposable address.It's more about laziness
But:
Not Found
The requested URL /cgi-bin/3D"https://forum.monero.cc/user/acti= was not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at tempinbox.com Port 80
nvm, different service worked!
October 19, 2014, 04:16:24 PM
Do we really need to have email confirmations to make an account?
If you care about anonymity that much, use a disposable address. October 19, 2014, 04:13:19 PM
Do we really need to have email confirmations to make an account?
October 19, 2014, 04:12:05 PM
forum.monero.cc won't allow me to login, due to inactivity. it would be nice to have a contact link on the front page.
Due to inactivity? Is is about the Web of Trust part? If yes then you can just skip it entirely (and complete it later) October 19, 2014, 04:10:06 PM
forum.monero.cc won't allow me to login, due to inactivity. it would be nice to have a contact link on the front page.
Jump to: