Jl777 himself said to be careful, that ring signatures might not work.
Invest at your own risk is what I think he said actually
In one ear and out the other = Major losses. Wake up people.
Invest at your own risk is what I think he said actually
In one ear and out the other = Major losses. Wake up people.
Is it true?
James was nice to us and we should be nice to James. That means a wrenching change from the empirically justified default prior assumption of altcoin scamminess, to a more generous stance, in which the default assumption is good will. One might still be critical of the structure of James' enterprises (or not!) without any hostility to James.
Whereas you might have considered his advice "Invest at your own risk" in its context (or in its misleading out-of-context quotation) to be an inimical effort to poison the public mind and common knowledge against the virtues of Monero (in particular, as everyone loves and protects their children), now, out of respect for his role in the BCX affair (such as it is) one should respect him well enough to attribute good will, and understand that in its original and intended context his words were simply sound advice to the naive investor.
Monero had it's run, don't get stuck with the bag.
You can see smart devs and investors are selling
You can see smart devs and investors are selling
Is it true?
BlackWidow, on the other hand -- and why not "BlockWidow", which would have been far more clever? -- has earned no such moral variance from rational estimation, and should be considered on par with the newbie bytecoin shill/troll/shrills.
I know that it's all a lot of tedious drama, but having been chosen by providence and our choices to live through these experiences, let us at least draw from them the appropriate, empowering and uplifting lessons.
