usually about half an hour - an hour
Confirmed. 
Polo didn't show the confirmations in realtime with this amount.
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1454. (Read 4670622 times)
September 10, 2014, 02:49:20 PM
Polo didn't show the confirmations in realtime with this amount.
September 10, 2014, 02:32:00 PM
How long does it usually take for transactions with ~100xmr to show up at Polo balance?
usually about half an hour - an hour September 10, 2014, 02:26:00 PM
I found out that i had to remove Kaspersky Internet Security 2013, install KIS 2015 and run bitmonerod with KIS protection off! simplewallet.exe syncing right now with bitmonerod! 
If you have Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 -
never DON't drop simplewallet.exe & bitmonerod.exe
to folder
c:\users\Admin\appdata\roaming\bitmonero
It's best to use another one!
I'll be Glad if that would be useful for somebody!
Thank everyone for help!
If you have Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 -
never DON't drop simplewallet.exe & bitmonerod.exe
to folder
c:\users\Admin\appdata\roaming\bitmonero
It's best to use another one!
I'll be Glad if that would be useful for somebody!
Thank everyone for help!
September 10, 2014, 02:17:41 PM
How long does it usually take for transactions with ~100xmr to show up at Polo balance?
September 10, 2014, 12:16:39 PM
Can you provide a little bit more information, like maybe tell us the exact steps you took and what it did do?
Ok i just noticed by myself that this wasn't working because the wallet.bin.keys i had in my wallet directory was the keys from my older wallet, how can i retrieve the wallet.bin.keys from my current wallet that i have access to ?
September 10, 2014, 12:04:28 PM
Investors don't care about 3d party GUIs. In fact, the RPC builds don't even work for me at all and non-RPC isn't really more user friendly than simplewallet CLI.
For that QT-GUI not even compiled builds exist. Not user-friendly at all.
I'm not holding a huge amount, but I'd definitely donate for a working Windows compile by dev team in alpha stadium.
For that QT-GUI not even compiled builds exist. Not user-friendly at all.
I'm not holding a huge amount, but I'd definitely donate for a working Windows compile by dev team in alpha stadium.
"Investors" is a misnomer. They don't pay our salaries, and the majority of them have hardly donated to Monero development.
Nonetheless, as the past two weeks have demonstrated there are fundamental things we have to get right BEFORE we can even think about finalising our GUI. Work has not stopped on it, but we are spending less time on it and more time on fundamentals.
Thinking the devs or the core team or whoever supports a coin should care about "Investors" is a fallacy inherited from the 99.9% of crap that compose altcoinsland.
I am grateful fluffy and other developers don't see Monero holders as investors, and don't sell shiny promises to whoever sees him/herself as such.
In fact they do the exact opposite, and that is one of the things that makes Monero different. If you disagree with the priorities and directions taken by the team, I suggest you go back to the 99.9%.
Note that nobody said that having a GUI was bad, it is just not an urgent priority, and there are good reasons for that.
September 10, 2014, 11:47:12 AM
Investors don't care about 3d party GUIs. In fact, the RPC builds don't even work for me at all and non-RPC isn't really more user friendly than simplewallet CLI.
For that QT-GUI not even compiled builds exist. Not user-friendly at all.
I'm not holding a huge amount, but I'd definitely donate for a working Windows compile by dev team in alpha stadium.
For that QT-GUI not even compiled builds exist. Not user-friendly at all.
I'm not holding a huge amount, but I'd definitely donate for a working Windows compile by dev team in alpha stadium.
"Investors" is a misnomer. They don't pay our salaries, and the majority of them have hardly donated to Monero development.
Nonetheless, as the past two weeks have demonstrated there are fundamental things we have to get right BEFORE we can even think about finalising our GUI. Work has not stopped on it, but we are spending less time on it and more time on fundamentals.
September 10, 2014, 11:45:35 AM
Whales are playing on Polo. At some point made 250 BTC buying wall at highest price to buy. Lot of chances to dump for those that have to. And lot of chances could trigger panick buying.
September 10, 2014, 10:31:25 AM
No, that's not one of ours. I suggest Jojatekok's Windows Client - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monerox-a-cross-platform-graphical-account-manager-for-monero-683365
Is this Jojatekok's Windows Client better then CryptoNoteWallet.exe? September 10, 2014, 10:28:17 AM
Am I the only one that feels that we've outgrown the forum real estate that is generally attributed to an altcoin in BitcoinTalk? I was checking the OP, and the MoneroTalk.org forum is the closest alternative listed (other than reddit, IRC, etc), but doesn't appear to be very active.
Is there a plan (or could we pool for one) of moving towards a dedicated forum?
I'm not too thrilled about MoneroTalk.org, just for the fact that I'm so much more familiar with SMF. I suppose there might be others in the same position as me... Just food for thought.
~ Myagui
Is there a plan (or could we pool for one) of moving towards a dedicated forum?
I'm not too thrilled about MoneroTalk.org, just for the fact that I'm so much more familiar with SMF. I suppose there might be others in the same position as me... Just food for thought.
~ Myagui
There's a plan - it got slightly derailed by the attacks over the past two weeks, but now that we're getting back on track we'll start pulling things together.
September 10, 2014, 10:27:04 AM
You mean exactly like we have on the OP? Here:
GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
- Qt GUI (Cross-platform) by Neozaru
- Windows GUI by Jojatekok
fluffypony, I have used some GUI XMR wallet early - CryptoNoteWallet.exe...
Is It one of these 2 or not? What GUI is better for luckless user?
No, that's not one of ours. I suggest Jojatekok's Windows Client - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monerox-a-cross-platform-graphical-account-manager-for-monero-683365
September 10, 2014, 10:25:08 AM
delete your wallet.bin (or whatever you've called your wallet) - NOT the wallet.bin.keys file - and run simplewallet as normal. It will rebuild the wallet cache from scratch.
Hi thanks for your help, i just did this and opened simplewallet but it didn't rebuilded the cache as expected
Can you provide a little bit more information, like maybe tell us the exact steps you took and what it did do?
September 10, 2014, 10:22:36 AM
You mean exactly like we have on the OP? Here:
GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
- Qt GUI (Cross-platform) by Neozaru
- Windows GUI by Jojatekok
fluffypony, I have used some GUI XMR wallet early - CryptoNoteWallet.exe...
Is It one of these 2 or not? What GUI is better for luckless user?
September 10, 2014, 10:13:26 AM
delete your wallet.bin (or whatever you've called your wallet) - NOT the wallet.bin.keys file - and run simplewallet as normal. It will rebuild the wallet cache from scratch.
Hi thanks for your help, i just did this and opened simplewallet but it didn't rebuilded the cache as expected
September 10, 2014, 10:12:02 AM
Am I the only one that feels that we've outgrown the forum real estate that is generally attributed to an altcoin in BitcoinTalk? I was checking the OP, and the MoneroTalk.org forum is the closest alternative listed (other than reddit, IRC, etc), but doesn't appear to be very active.
Is there a plan (or could we pool for one) of moving towards a dedicated forum?
I'm not too thrilled about MoneroTalk.org, just for the fact that I'm so much more familiar with SMF. I suppose there might be others in the same position as me... Just food for thought.
~ Myagui
Is there a plan (or could we pool for one) of moving towards a dedicated forum?
I'm not too thrilled about MoneroTalk.org, just for the fact that I'm so much more familiar with SMF. I suppose there might be others in the same position as me... Just food for thought.
~ Myagui
September 10, 2014, 10:09:49 AM
It would be great if there was a Windows GUI by the official devs.
It doesn't have to be officially released though.
What about providing an early test build (with big alpha-logo inside) once per KB fees are implemented? Precompiled for Windows with all the necessary runtime environments bundled.
It doesn't have to be officially released though.
What about providing an early test build (with big alpha-logo inside) once per KB fees are implemented? Precompiled for Windows with all the necessary runtime environments bundled.
You mean exactly like we have on the OP? Here:
GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
- Qt GUI (Cross-platform) by Neozaru
- Windows GUI by Jojatekok
Think some are asking for a ICON + DOUBLECLICK = LAUNCH version.
September 10, 2014, 10:07:08 AM
You mean exactly like we have on the OP? Here:
GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
Investors don't care about 3d party GUIs. In fact, the RPC builds don't even work for me at all and non-RPC isn't really more user friendly than simplewallet CLI.GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
- Qt GUI (Cross-platform) by Neozaru
- Windows GUI by Jojatekok
For that QT-GUI not even compiled builds exist. Not user-friendly at all.
I'm not holding a huge amount, but I'd definitely donate for a working Windows compile by dev team in alpha stadium.
September 10, 2014, 10:04:56 AM
I've always gotten similar errors, but just ignored them. For example:
Code:
[P2P4][sock 1100] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
[P2P4][sock 1068] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
and[P2P4][sock 1068] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
Code:
[P2P1][sock 996] Some problems at write: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine:10053
We have different situations:
just some of your bitmonerod connections have forcibly closed by the remote host or software in your host machine, but sync starts & goes with this unimportant errors in bitmonerod.log
As for me - sync doesn't start at all 'cause something on my PC terminates the connections one after the other!
September 10, 2014, 09:49:55 AM
It would be great if there was a Windows GUI by the official devs.
It doesn't have to be officially released though.
What about providing an early test build (with big alpha-logo inside) once per KB fees are implemented? Precompiled for Windows with all the necessary runtime environments bundled.
It doesn't have to be officially released though.
What about providing an early test build (with big alpha-logo inside) once per KB fees are implemented? Precompiled for Windows with all the necessary runtime environments bundled.
You mean exactly like we have on the OP? Here:
GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.
- Qt GUI (Cross-platform) by Neozaru
- Windows GUI by Jojatekok
September 10, 2014, 09:35:09 AM
What does this error of bitmonerod mean?
Some problems at write:
software on your host computer severed established connection:
10053
Some problems at write:
software on your host computer severed established connection:
10053
It's really hard to pin this down, as you are the only person encountering any of these issues. We try to test thoroughly in multiple Windows environments on VMs with restricted hardware, and even they don't hit the problems you're seeing. At any rate, that 10052 is not a Monero error, it's an error coming from Windows, and it basically means that there was a socket error. 99% of the time a socket error is caused by overly aggressive antivirus software.
I've always gotten similar errors, but just ignored them. For example:
Code:
[P2P4][sock 1100] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
[P2P4][sock 1068] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
[P2P4][sock 1068] Some problems at write: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
and
Code:
[P2P1][sock 996] Some problems at write: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine:10053
Jump to: