Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 2046. (Read 4670972 times)

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
I'm on Arch too, and while it's in the repos, I shouldn't need it to fix a bug in a program, as the devs should be doing that.

Let me explain how this works. The devs' salary is....are you ready for it?......zero dollars and zero cents (or if you prefer zero moneros).

You are just as eligible to submit fixes to github as anyone else.

Throwing mud at the volunteer developers for not prioritizing what you think should be prioritized (and can easily be worked around with a standard utility) won't win you any style points.


I'm not saying the devs don't deserve a pat on the back for their work thus far. But they released alpha software. It's full of bugs. Not like some small oversight, but HUGE bugs.


Noone ever said this isnt alpha software. Hell bitcoin is still in beta after 5 years... Thats how open source software works....you release it and slowly community makes the software better... This is not a bitcoin clone!
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
I'm on Arch too, and while it's in the repos, I shouldn't need it to fix a bug in a program, as the devs should be doing that.

Let me explain how this works. The devs' salary is....are you ready for it?......zero dollars and zero cents (or if you prefer zero moneros).

You are just as eligible to submit fixes to github as anyone else.

Throwing mud at the volunteer developers for not prioritizing what you think should be prioritized (and can easily be worked around with a standard utility) won't win you any style points.


I'm not saying the devs don't deserve a pat on the back for their work thus far. But they released alpha software. It's full of bugs. Not like some small oversight, but HUGE bugs.

I agree. The merged mining stuff has been a disaster for example (wallet breaking bugs twice).

I don't understand why you are focusing on the one bug that has an easy and essentially complete work around though.

Any rational prioritization puts bugs with a workaround below bugs without one. That has been done here. Every time there has been a serious bug (i.e. merged mining breaking wallets twice, or a poor implementation of checkpointing being exploited), there was a fix pushed out very quickly.

Seriously, the devs are doing the best they can. If you can contribute to doing better, great. If not then appreciate what they do or move on to another coin. Repeatedly sniping at them here over relatively minor issues is getting old.



sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Anyone knows how many coins there are? Couldn't find the explorer.

cheers

number of blocks*17.2 . Something around that.

This is the only info I am able to find about current supply. Can anyone confirm this?

That's about right. The reward started at something like 17.5 now its down to about 16.9


Thank you both.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
I'm on Arch too, and while it's in the repos, I shouldn't need it to fix a bug in a program, as the devs should be doing that.

Let me explain how this works. The devs' salary is....are you ready for it?......zero dollars and zero cents (or if you prefer zero moneros).

You are just as eligible to submit fixes to github as anyone else.

Throwing mud at the volunteer developers for not prioritizing what you think should be prioritized (and can easily be worked around with a standard utility) won't win you any style points.



hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
Yah i tried that exact line they had, but it seems like it not working with 12.04 im very confused. driving me crazy!
Use do-upgrade-release thrice to upgrade.
From 12.04 to 12.10
From 12.10 to 13.04
From 13.04 to 13.10
Then try again
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Anyone knows how many coins there are? Couldn't find the explorer.

cheers

number of blocks*17.2 . Something around that.

This is the only info I am able to find about current supply. Can anyone confirm this?

That's about right. The reward started at something like 17.5 now its down to about 16.9
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
there is only Windows 64-bit blockchain in the OP
will it work for 32-bit?
No, it won't. Please someone with a fully-sync'd 32-bits blockchain upload it, I will add it to the pack.
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Anyone knows how many coins there are? Couldn't find the explorer.

cheers

number of blocks*17.2 . Something around that.

This is the only info I am able to find about current supply. Can anyone confirm this?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
It doesn't even COMPILE on Arch.
I am on Arch (well, Manjaro). Use http://bit.ly/monerostarterpack and get the Linux binaries - they are compiled on Ubuntu but work on Arch. I am the maintainer, by the way.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Okay, one feature we REALLY need in simplewallet is a command history buffer. It doesn't have to be persistent; it can start with an empty buffer every time. Having to retype things kinda sucks. And I automatically press the up arrow and get garbage that I have to erase.
Duly noted, you are not the only one to wish for it!

Use rlwrap

$ rlwrap ./simpleminer --wallet mywallet


So, install a third-party piece of software to fix a bug in Monero because the devs aren't doing it?

Not third party Ubuntu. Standard package. Not sure about other distros though.

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Okay, one feature we REALLY need in simplewallet is a command history buffer. It doesn't have to be persistent; it can start with an empty buffer every time. Having to retype things kinda sucks. And I automatically press the up arrow and get garbage that I have to erase.
Duly noted, you are not the only one to wish for it!

Use rlwrap

$ rlwrap ./simpleminer --wallet mywallet
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
I agree completely and withdraw my previous attitude. I thought transparency of the issue would be smart, especially considering interested parties have already been accused of "conspiring" behind the community's back. I also wanted knowledgable followers of the thread to be aware of the issue, especially if they have interest in MRO. I don't mind where the discussion takes place, as long as the people in this thread to know it's taking place.
I suggest regularly pasting a text like "Reminder, for those interested in the deep economics issues that monero is trying to solve, please read  Monero economy". Or something like that, you get the idea (The OP has so much info I am not sure people would get it - or maybe people interested in it are the same people that use the whole OP, then issue solved).

Okay, one feature we REALLY need in simplewallet is a command history buffer. It doesn't have to be persistent; it can start with an empty buffer every time. Having to retype things kinda sucks. And I automatically press the up arrow and get garbage that I have to erase.
Duly noted, you are not the only one to wish for it!
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
hahaha, there is actually a file called slow-hash.c!

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/7620d55e6c9d9d625740004c86de17354ccceed2

it's almost as if somebody wanted others to optimize it...

I'm just guessing (the cryptonote developers are mysterious so usually all we can do is guess) it's called slow hash because it is intended to be used a memory-hard proof-of-work, as opposed to other (faster) hashes used for digests.

Oh sure, come up with a totally reasonable explanation for my find  Grin

your find is at least a week old if you check the thread and thats a pretty reasonable explanation...

That too.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
hahaha, there is actually a file called slow-hash.c!

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/7620d55e6c9d9d625740004c86de17354ccceed2

it's almost as if somebody wanted others to optimize it...

I'm just guessing (the cryptonote developers are mysterious so usually all we can do is guess) it's called slow hash because it is intended to be used a memory-hard proof-of-work, as opposed to other (faster) hashes used for digests.

Oh sure, come up with a totally reasonable explanation for my find  Grin

your find is at least a week old if you check the thread and thats a pretty reasonable explanation...
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 12
hahaha, there is actually a file called slow-hash.c!

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/7620d55e6c9d9d625740004c86de17354ccceed2

it's almost as if somebody wanted others to optimize it...

I'm just guessing (the cryptonote developers are mysterious so usually all we can do is guess) it's called slow hash because it is intended to be used a memory-hard proof-of-work, as opposed to other (faster) hashes used for digests.

Oh sure, come up with a totally reasonable explanation for my find  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
hahaha, there is actually a file called slow-hash.c!

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/7620d55e6c9d9d625740004c86de17354ccceed2

it's almost as if somebody wanted others to optimize it...

I'm just guessing (the cryptonote developers are mysterious so usually all we can do is guess) it's called slow hash because it is intended to be used a memory-hard proof-of-work, as opposed to other (faster) hashes used for digests.


member
Activity: 140
Merit: 12
hahaha, there is actually a file called slow-hash.c!

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/7620d55e6c9d9d625740004c86de17354ccceed2

it's almost as if somebody wanted others to optimize it...
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
What is the max supply of this coin? I didn't see it in the OP. And is there only one exchange?

It's 18.4 million (given in the OP), but a minimum subsidy will likely implemented so that there's a very slow inflation starting in about 8 years. Yes, there's only one exchange because this is not based on Bitcoin so it takes some effort to integrate.
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 250
What is the max supply of this coin? I didn't see it in the OP. And is there only one exchange?
Jump to: