Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 2055. (Read 4670562 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
We should voting to some big exchange like Mintpal
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
I like this coin because you can get coins to for free and the wallet works great!
how can i get free coins? Cheesy

The giveaway hasn't started yet, but will soon.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I like this coin because you can get coins to for free and the wallet works great!
how can i get free coins? Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.

It will be CPU only mining pool?
MRO is currently CPU only as far as we know. If you do have a GPU miner or ASIC, I will accept shares and blocks from them also.  Wink
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
FYI to fix the link problem just use url tags around the link like this
Code:
[url]https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting[/url]
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting
Thanks!
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
It will be CPU only mining pool?
Yes, since CryptoNight is CPU-only (at least currently).
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.

It will be CPU only mining pool?
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold
For sure it is:)

Remember to vote for monero on swaphole!
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting

(copy the whole link, simple machines forum breaks the links with a #)
FYI to fix the link problem just use url tags around the link like this
Code:
[url]https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting[/url]
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
Please someone message me I want to buy more monero, I will pay on the high end

I don't have any feedback so we can do escrow or whatever the formal sell procedure is
https://cryptonote.exchange.to/
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
When can pool diggers?
Soon, the dev are now working on the frond end.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
When can pool diggers?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold
For sure it is:)

Remember to vote for monero on swaphole!
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting

(copy the whole link, simple machines forum breaks the links with a #)
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
what to do when i got this one?  Huh

Code:
2014-May-12 06:23:00.201575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 06:23:00.209575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [90.220.5.84:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()

is this a problem ?

It won't break your daemon but it does cause extra connections to be opened. If you see a lot of them it is best to restart your daemon.
thanks for your reply

yes i have 100's of them inside my log, but after a restart it runs smooth again.

i just hope it does not happen while im sleeping  Grin

otherwise i would just make a small Catch n replay script that restarts the deamon from time to time.  Roll Eyes

A few of them are no big deal. Nothing really bad will happen if the error occurs while you are sleeping. Just restart it if you see a lot of them.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Orphans are normal. It doesn't mean that your block from mining was necessarily orphaned, it may be (and usually is) just some orphan from the network. That is an expected part of how block chains work and the reason why multiple confirmations are required.


full member
Activity: 122
Merit: 100
what to do when i got this one?  Huh

Code:
2014-May-12 06:23:00.201575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 06:23:00.209575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [90.220.5.84:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()

is this a problem ?

It won't break your daemon but it does cause extra connections to be opened. If you see a lot of them it is best to restart your daemon.

when i check the log , i found there's many orphans in there, and also some network error, so what can i do ? why there's so many orphans? maybe there are more than 5 orphans at least, here's a part of my log:

2014-May-12 09:24:20.188696 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl
:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 09:24:20.188772 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_a
sync.h:515 [54.187.205.25:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send
2014-May-12 09:24:20.188982 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl
:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 09:24:20.189038 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_a
sync.h:515 [108.61.194.121:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send
2014-May-12 09:24:20.189407 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl
:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 09:24:20.189468 [P2P8]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_a
sync.h:515 [140.180.190.181:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send
2014-May-12 09:24:20.318269 [P2P5]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id = <09e2e9c7e10ce84a266788
0d40a344489bb894c5163c4126b8bfd5be51226001>
2014-May-12 09:24:20.527331 [P2P1]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id = <09e2e9c7e10ce84a266788
0d40a344489bb894c5163c4126b8bfd5be51226001>
2014-May-12 09:24:21.598271 [P2P5][212.234.243.195:18080 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-May-12 09:24:21.989431 [P2P7]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl
:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 09:24:21.989538 [P2P7]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_a
sync.h:638 [60.178.228.189:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()
2014-May-12 09:24:21.989586 [P2P7]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl
:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 09:24:21.989656 [P2P7]ERROR /root/bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_a
sync.h:638 [24.60.203.161:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
what to do when i got this one?  Huh

Code:
2014-May-12 06:23:00.201575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-May-12 06:23:00.209575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [90.220.5.84:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()

is this a problem ?

It won't break your daemon but it does cause extra connections to be opened. If you see a lot of them it is best to restart your daemon.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Can somebody explain the difference between BitMonero and Monero and what happened in the past?

It is reasonably well explained here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6645981

It is odd given TFT's sentiments about the name change (linked above, quoted below) and hard forks these questions are still being asked again and again, but you have to understand that the world of cryptocoins has become rampant with FUD campaigns, puppet accounts and all sort of dirty tricks. It is sad that people want to operate that way instead of focusing on building the best technology and products, but there is nothing we can do about it, except minimize the disruption they cause. Fortunately most of their efforts are pretty transparent and ineffective (see comments a page or two back on this thread, or better yet don't).


The previous quote was posted in the Quazar thread by me. It was not a part of any FUD campaign, just my understand of things at the time. I now see that TFT is the problem.

Question: Are both coins using the same chain?

The is only one coin/chain.

EDIT: btc-mike, my comment wasn't specifically addressed toward your comment, but there most certainly are organized FUD and puppet campaigns. They've been continuous since BCN appeared. What frequently happens is innocent third parties don't realize it is fake and end up responding to and repeating the same stuff the puppets are posting. Since we can't shut down (or even definitively identify) the 30+ sock puppet accounts, it is best to just ignore them on move forward with building a useful coin.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
Can somebody explain the difference between BitMonero and Monero and what happened in the past?

It is reasonably well explained here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6645981

It is odd given TFT's sentiments about the name change (linked above, quoted below) and hard forks these questions are still being asked again and again, but you have to understand that the world of cryptocoins has become rampant with FUD campaigns, puppet accounts and all sort of dirty tricks. It is sad that people want to operate that way instead of focusing on building the best technology and products, but there is nothing we can do about it, except minimize the disruption they cause. Fortunately most of their efforts are pretty transparent and ineffective (see comments a page or two back on this thread, or better yet don't).


The previous quote was posted in the Quazar thread by me. It was not a part of any FUD campaign, just my understand of things at the time. I now see that TFT is the problem.

Question: Are both coins using the same chain?
Jump to: