Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 585. (Read 4670673 times)

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
A friend of mine shared this article with me today.   Since he does security work on networks and the like for a living I always take what he says seriously about hacking.  He has also been a supporter of Monero since I got involved almost two years ago.

https://www.guardicore.com/2016/06/the-photominer-campaign/

That has been extensively discussed on the Monero subreddit recently: https://reddit.com/r/monero
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 100
A friend of mine shared this article with me today.   Since he does security work on networks and the like for a living I always take what he says seriously about hacking.  He has also been a supporter of Monero since I got involved almost two years ago.

https://www.guardicore.com/2016/06/the-photominer-campaign/

Earlier in this thread maybe a year or so ago, there was a few posts by somebody who claimed to be part of a eastern european hacker group that was highly interested in Monero.  (I cant seem to find the post since I cannot remember the name of the group. But i remember them saying that their hacker group was their username)  Id say there is a good chance they are involved with this.

Edit

found the post of interest.  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8381682

This makes it the first exposed botnet/malware utilizing Monero.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250

good2cu  Smiley

Looks like a good amount of work from moneromoo and Shen Noether on RingCT.   Cool

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/network

Thanks. I never really took my eye off of Monero, I just have lacked the time to interact with the community recently.

I was not going to log in today until I noticed the Chesscoin ICO announcement and felt the need to share my (very negative) feelings about it.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008

good2cu  Smiley

Looks like a good amount of work from moneromoo and Shen Noether on RingCT.   Cool

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/network
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 500
novag
It seems to me that the Monero in their basic characteristics reminiscent of Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
If I ran that pool I'd be skimming the virus addresses. Lol
hero member
Activity: 850
Merit: 1000

I'm glad to see that this article covered many of the shuffling methods, and that it also rightly concluded that none of them are 100% untraceable.

Guess what is 100% untraceable? And also 100% fungible, private, and decentralized? <3 Monero
hero member
Activity: 1873
Merit: 840
Keep what's important, and know who's your friend
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
A friend of mine shared this article with me today.   Since he does security work on networks and the like for a living I always take what he says seriously about hacking.  He has also been a supporter of Monero since I got involved almost two years ago.

https://www.guardicore.com/2016/06/the-photominer-campaign/



Discussed here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/4o1llq/security_researchers_uncover_a_worm_photominer/

&

https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/4o1ebq/worm_spreads_via_ftp_and_http_mines_monero/
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 500
novag
Monero still very strong coin, and soon perhaps any country in the world can be interested in this coin.
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 251
A friend of mine shared this article with me today.   Since he does security work on networks and the like for a living I always take what he says seriously about hacking.  He has also been a supporter of Monero since I got involved almost two years ago.

https://www.guardicore.com/2016/06/the-photominer-campaign/

legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
It makes one wonder what PLOS does to _verify_ an author's identity.  Do they only accept submissions from people who are already known... or could you fabricate a plausible name and curriculum vitae?
I'm not sure it matters though.  The PLOS publications all seem to concern biology, medical science and the like.  No math-y journals, at least I don't find any.

I think generally you submit from a .edu or .gov email address, or IBM.com email or whatever, and that is a decent verification that you are who you say you are and you work where you say you work.

PLOS One publishes science, period.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/search?q=cryptography&filterJournals=PLoSONE

I think if the email came from a monero domains (specifically, the core-team managed domain getmonero.org), it would be fine. There's nothing in the submission guidelines that suggests otherwise.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines

Quote
Each author on the list must have an affiliation. The affiliation includes department, university, or organizational affiliation and its location, including city, state/province (if applicable), and country.

I think its doable. The formatting of the MRL docs would need to be modified and we'd need to properly cite more things. For instance, the footnote on the final page of MRL1 "[3]See what I did there?" would need to go. In general, the tone of bulletin 1 is a bit colloquial.

Our Scientists are not anon so couldn't Noblesir publish a paper (specifically on his work) and reference (cite) the anon papers? And he peer reviewed those papers correct? I know they have been peer reviewed and thats all it should take I would think.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
It's not, but he didn't write the papers, afaik.

Worth a shot I guess, GingerAle, assuming the authors have any interest in it.
hero member
Activity: 1873
Merit: 840
Keep what's important, and know who's your friend
If you are interested, the Monero Research Lab has published some further whitepapers as well:

https://lab.getmonero.org

I wish more people were aware of MRL. Monero is the only coin that I'm aware of, apart from Bitcoin and Ethereum, that has people consistently performing academic-style research in the background and publishing papers of a certain level (ie not crap). People frequently underestimate the difficulty and the importance of this.

Would be even more sweet if we got them peer reviewed. Yah know, its not impossible to get things published in PLOS.

Afaik there are almost no scholarly publications that accept work from pseudonymous or anonymous authors. Even the blockchain journal started by Peter_R said they wouldn't accept anonymous submissions except under extraordinary circumstances I think.

Well wouldn't Ricardo (fluffypony) be an exception? Or is that name pseudononymous too?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
It makes one wonder what PLOS does to _verify_ an author's identity.  Do they only accept submissions from people who are already known... or could you fabricate a plausible name and curriculum vitae?
I'm not sure it matters though.  The PLOS publications all seem to concern biology, medical science and the like.  No math-y journals, at least I don't find any.

I think generally you submit from a .edu or .gov email address, or IBM.com email or whatever, and that is a decent verification that you are who you say you are and you work where you say you work.

PLOS One publishes science, period.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/search?q=cryptography&filterJournals=PLoSONE

I think if the email came from a monero domains (specifically, the core-team managed domain getmonero.org), it would be fine. There's nothing in the submission guidelines that suggests otherwise.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines

Quote
Each author on the list must have an affiliation. The affiliation includes department, university, or organizational affiliation and its location, including city, state/province (if applicable), and country.

I think its doable. The formatting of the MRL docs would need to be modified and we'd need to properly cite more things. For instance, the footnote on the final page of MRL1 "[3]See what I did there?" would need to go. In general, the tone of bulletin 1 is a bit colloquial.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
It makes one wonder what PLOS does to _verify_ an author's identity.  Do they only accept submissions from people who are already known... or could you fabricate a plausible name and curriculum vitae?
I'm not sure it matters though.  The PLOS publications all seem to concern biology, medical science and the like.  No math-y journals, at least I don't find any.

I think generally you submit from a .edu or .gov email address, or IBM.com email or whatever, and that is a decent verification that you are who you say you are and you work where you say you work.
hero member
Activity: 870
Merit: 585
It makes one wonder what PLOS does to _verify_ an author's identity.  Do they only accept submissions from people who are already known... or could you fabricate a plausible name and curriculum vitae?
I'm not sure it matters though.  The PLOS publications all seem to concern biology, medical science and the like.  No math-y journals, at least I don't find any.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
If you are interested, the Monero Research Lab has published some further whitepapers as well:

https://lab.getmonero.org

I wish more people were aware of MRL. Monero is the only coin that I'm aware of, apart from Bitcoin and Ethereum, that has people consistently performing academic-style research in the background and publishing papers of a certain level (ie not crap). People frequently underestimate the difficulty and the importance of this.

Would be even more sweet if we got them peer reviewed. Yah know, its not impossible to get things published in PLOS.

Afaik there are almost no scholarly publications that accept work from pseudonymous or anonymous authors. Even the blockchain journal started by Peter_R said they wouldn't accept anonymous submissions except under extraordinary circumstances I think.
Jump to: