Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 643. (Read 4670673 times)

sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 251
Node count in China continues to gradually grow: https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html

If you live in China, please start more nodes.  Then contact your favorite Chinese exchanges and ask for Monero trading.

There's a node close to me, which sort of blows my mind.

So what area are you located?
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 251
Tonight I read through some of the Ideas section over on Monero Forums and this idea just really speaks to me.  Although I have know idea how to do  it and I don't have the technical skills that would be needed, I think this is something to start looking into and thinking about for the future acceptance of monero from more than just traders and enthusiasts.

I understand that most of the work on monero right now is centralized around the fundamentals set out by the devs and the creation of real world usable features like RingCT, GUI wallet and others. This development is fundamental of course and is what will and is making monero great.  I think its time though to start discussing how monero captures more users especially business that can accept day to day transactions.

I came across this post by kodaxx on the forum and I post a link of it here so those that may have not read his idea could read it over.  Maybe there is someone out there in the monero community now thinking about this same issue or maybe someone out there would know how to go about a project like this.  I love the idea and I would love to see this become a reality. Like kodaxx said in his post the first coin to get something like his idea right would benefit so much.

https://forum.getmonero.org/6/ideas/2434/monero-pos-system-like-square

legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
Node count in China continues to gradually grow: https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html

If you live in China, please start more nodes.  Then contact your favorite Chinese exchanges and ask for Monero trading.

There's a node close to me, which sort of blows my mind.
full member
Activity: 122
Merit: 100
Node count in China continues to gradually grow: https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html

If you live in China, please start more nodes.  Then contact your favorite Chinese exchanges and ask for Monero trading.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
It is only exploratory so far, but a major East Coast U.S. V.C. has asked me to brief them on XMR. (Please do not speculate on this basis.).  What are the best collateral materials for this purpose?  Software engineers with some bitcoin exposure will be there, and I should like to satisfy their questions from script, where possible.

Not sure if these have been shared yet but here are the slides from Fluffypony's "50 Shades of Privacy" presentation, very informative:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Wr0za-GUUUWGdrc0E4TjB0WTg/view?usp=sharing

Well I'm sold.  That was epic!   Cool

edit: the post below this this one made me realize we need the Fluffysliden translated into non-western languages ASAP.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1004
It is only exploratory so far, but a major East Coast U.S. V.C. has asked me to brief them on XMR. (Please do not speculate on this basis.).  What are the best collateral materials for this purpose?  Software engineers with some bitcoin exposure will be there, and I should like to satisfy their questions from script, where possible.

Not sure if these have been shared yet but here are the slides from Fluffypony's "50 Shades of Privacy" presentation, very informative:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Wr0za-GUUUWGdrc0E4TjB0WTg/view?usp=sharing
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1004
introducing Monero-PHP:
https://github.com/PsychicCat/monero-php

x-post from reddit:
Quote
I'm learning PHP at the moment so I decided to put together a simple wrapper class for the simplewallet JSON-RPC API.
There were already some good implementations out there from TheKoziTwo and MalMen, but this is less opinionated and deals only with simplewallet communication! Plus, you can easily install it in your PHP project using Composer.
If anyone does end up using it please feel free to let me know feedback/things that could be improved. Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
This? http://moneroinvestment.com
Forever a work in progress though.

That's the one.

It's due for an annual update, but still a great representation of the uber-bull thesis.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
Those are all great links iCEBREAKER, but the one aminorex really needs is this one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qomqt/what_a_landmark_legal_case_from_mid1700s_scotland/

That's the first thing Adam talks about in his speech.  Might be kind of esoteric deep diving for a VC.

There was a great Potential Monero Investor Executive Summary that Risto wrote or edited.  Can't find it on the MEW page.  Halp?

This? http://moneroinvestment.com
Forever a work in progress though.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Those are all great links iCEBREAKER, but the one aminorex really needs is this one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qomqt/what_a_landmark_legal_case_from_mid1700s_scotland/

That's the first thing Adam talks about in his speech.  Might be kind of esoteric deep diving for a VC.

There was a great Potential Monero Investor Executive Summary that Risto wrote or edited.  Can't find it on the MEW page.  Halp?
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
Those are all great links iCEBREAKER, but the one aminorex really needs is this one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qomqt/what_a_landmark_legal_case_from_mid1700s_scotland/
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Fungibility is an emergent property here because Monero is a constructed device. Thus fungibility must emerge from the construction.

Fungibility in other (mostly historical) cases is not emergent but a property of the underlying good.

Isn't fungibility an intrinsic property of, and thus indistinguishable from, Monero's construction?

Quote

I believe ^that supports my POV, given the speaker notes "fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."

Put another way, Monero's privacy is optional/voluntary (ie weak) but its fungibility is not (ie strong).  From there, I conclude the latter is logically prior to the former (and the fussy/subtle supervenience relation therein).

For you noob lurkers, here's some background about why this is such a Big Deal.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/401i0r/great_point_fungibility_upgrades_are_equal_to_if/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zr9hz/andreas_antonopoulos_another_proposal_based_on/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4012hu/bitpay_is_actively_cooperating_with_chainalysis/
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Love that word.  

"What's so special about Monero?"  

"It's supervenient."

 Grin Grin Grin

Monero:  Fungibilistic.  Supervenient.  Cryptolicious.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

It's nice to quote Adam Back but I think his formulation is weak.
It's better expressed as "Fungibility requires privacy". The later relationship makes it clear there is no other way to obtain fungibility at the macro scale than to offer privacy at the user scale.

Adam's (admittedly subtle) formulation is exactly right; yours creates chicken-or-egg recursion.  Did you listen to the context?

He may have put up some reddit posts on the subject too.  CBA to find them tho.   Tongue

It's more a matter of PR and catchyness rather than pure logic, for me both are correct in terms of logic.
What I find weak/unintuitive with his statement is that he expresses the desired result at the global scale (fungibility) and says "by the way that also gives you" the desired result at the individual scale (pricacy).
I much prefer to express that if you want to get to the general goal "fungibility", you'll have to design your system for the goal "privacy" and there is no alternative that'd by-pass it

Monero's "involuntary" (ie 100%) fungibility is logically prior to its privacy, which is an emergent property.

Systemic macro scale fungibility supervenes upon privacy at the individual user level.

Pure logic FTW.   Cool

I still disagree because for me fungibility is the emergent property, not the other way around.
Anyway we might be splitting hairs.  Smiley

Fungibility is an emergent property here because Monero is a constructed device. Thus fungibility must emerge from the construction.

Fungibility in other (mostly historical) cases is not emergent but a property of the underlying good.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

It's nice to quote Adam Back but I think his formulation is weak.
It's better expressed as "Fungibility requires privacy". The later relationship makes it clear there is no other way to obtain fungibility at the macro scale than to offer privacy at the user scale.

Adam's (admittedly subtle) formulation is exactly right; yours creates chicken-or-egg recursion.  Did you listen to the context?

He may have put up some reddit posts on the subject too.  CBA to find them tho.   Tongue

It's more a matter of PR and catchyness rather than pure logic, for me both are correct in terms of logic.
What I find weak/unintuitive with his statement is that he expresses the desired result at the global scale (fungibility) and says "by the way that also gives you" the desired result at the individual scale (pricacy).
I much prefer to express that if you want to get to the general goal "fungibility", you'll have to design your system for the goal "privacy" and there is no alternative that'd by-pass it

Monero's "involuntary" (ie 100%) fungibility is logically prior to its privacy, which is an emergent property.

Systemic macro scale fungibility supervenes upon privacy at the individual user level.

Pure logic FTW.   Cool

I still disagree because for me fungibility is the emergent property, not the other way around.
Anyway we might be splitting hairs.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
Love that word. 

"What's so special about Monero?" 

"It's supervenient."
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

It's nice to quote Adam Back but I think his formulation is weak.
It's better expressed as "Fungibility requires privacy". The later relationship makes it clear there is no other way to obtain fungibility at the macro scale than to offer privacy at the user scale.

Adam's (admittedly subtle) formulation is exactly right; yours creates chicken-or-egg recursion.  Did you listen to the context?

He may have put up some reddit posts on the subject too.  CBA to find them tho.   Tongue

It's more a matter of PR and catchyness rather than pure logic, for me both are correct in terms of logic.
What I find weak/unintuitive with his statement is that he expresses the desired result at the global scale (fungibility) and says "by the way that also gives you" the desired result at the individual scale (pricacy).
I much prefer to express that if you want to get to the general goal "fungibility", you'll have to design your system for the goal "privacy" and there is no alternative that'd by-pass it

Monero's "involuntary" (ie 100%) fungibility is logically prior to its privacy, which is an emergent property.

Systemic macro scale fungibility supervenes upon privacy at the individual user level.

Pure logic FTW.   Cool
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

It's nice to quote Adam Back but I think his formulation is weak.
It's better expressed as "Fungibility requires privacy". The later relationship makes it clear there is no other way to obtain fungibility at the macro scale than to offer privacy at the user scale.

Adam's (admittedly subtle) formulation is exactly right; yours creates chicken-or-egg recursion.  Did you listen to the context?

He may have put up some reddit posts on the subject too.  CBA to find them tho.   Tongue

It's more a matter of PR and catchyness rather than pure logic, for me both are correct in terms of logic.
What I find weak/unintuitive with his statement is that he expresses the desired result at the global scale (fungibility) and says "by the way that also gives you" the desired result at the individual scale (pricacy).
I much prefer to express that if you want to get to the general goal "fungibility", you'll have to design your system for the goal "privacy" and there is no alternative that'd by-pass it.

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
**Funding required! Improving Developer Guides to include Simplewallet examples and Bitmonerod methods and examples**

https://forum.getmonero.org/8/funding-required/2504/improving-developer-guides-to-include-simplewallet-examples-and-bitmonerod-methods-and-examples

Fully funded already, thanks to everyone who donated!
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

It's nice to quote Adam Back but I think his formulation is weak.
It's better expressed as "Fungibility requires privacy". The later relationship makes it clear there is no other way to obtain fungibility at the macro scale than to offer privacy at the user scale.

Adam's (admittedly subtle) formulation is exactly right; yours creates chicken-or-egg recursion.  Did you listen to the context?

He may have put up some reddit posts on the subject too.  CBA to find them tho.   Tongue
Jump to: