Topic: [XMR] Monero Mining - page 49. (Read 264826 times)
fix
If you're on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/ past 14 hours or so block finder is stuck.
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
You won't be paid for the 12 hours because the bitmonerod process of the pool was stuck and no new block information was available so you've been mining for nothing.
It happen, the admin felt into deep sleep and the second admin was not giving a damn.
It's working now though.
EDIT: This is not my pool, my pool don't have this problem.
If you're on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/ past 14 hours or so block finder is stuck.
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
Its now working again.
If you're on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/ past 14 hours or so block finder is stuck.
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
Haven't been paid for anything since =\
xnbya: Thanks for the reply.
Yes... while experimenting I have one other machine set-up this way and it does work only after the user has logged in then the program fires . I think I can have the user login automatically after reboot, only I believe one must set this up with no password don't like this idea as others use these computers?
The task manager route fires the program when the machine reboots after a power failure no user login required.
Yes... while experimenting I have one other machine set-up this way and it does work only after the user has logged in then the program fires . I think I can have the user login automatically after reboot, only I believe one must set this up with no password don't like this idea as others use these computers?
The task manager route fires the program when the machine reboots after a power failure no user login required.
minexmr.com has updated to the latest pool code
this update should help a lot, practically removing all of the issues with dust, making it easier for miners to spend their money & reducing sizes of transactions - good for everyone!
wetland: i haven't used windows for a while, but afaik if you add the bat to the startup folder in the start menu you should be able to see it
this update should help a lot, practically removing all of the issues with dust, making it easier for miners to spend their money & reducing sizes of transactions - good for everyone!
wetland: i haven't used windows for a while, but afaik if you add the bat to the startup folder in the start menu you should be able to see it
any good settings for an r9 280x ?
(sapphire vapor OC 3GB)
(sapphire vapor OC 3GB)
I have a question about viewing my Monero.bat file that is set to run on system start-up?
I have set the file to start on system start-up through Task Scheduler. I’m running Windows64.
I can see the program is running in task manager, however I would like to see my hash rate window (like I see when I start it manually). Is there a way / command I can use to view this? Can I just open the .bat file again? I would assume this would open a second instance… Any help / suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
***Originally posted in the main Monero thread. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7446505***
I have set the file to start on system start-up through Task Scheduler. I’m running Windows64.
I can see the program is running in task manager, however I would like to see my hash rate window (like I see when I start it manually). Is there a way / command I can use to view this? Can I just open the .bat file again? I would assume this would open a second instance… Any help / suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
***Originally posted in the main Monero thread. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7446505***
Guys, spread hashrate! http://xmr.hashinvest.net / 0.75% FEE
I take care of this pool all the day and night. HashInvest is pretty stable all the time. Low 0.75% fee. Instant online support and payouts.
You can't get more decentralized than http://moneropool.mooo.com/ which has a single miner at the moment, down from two an hour ago 
Feel free to join, the pool's first block needs finding
Feel free to join, the pool's first block needs finding
Help to decentralize Monero mining - join coinmine.pl pool - we have 0% fee!
feeleep
feeleep
minexmr.com now has optional fees, ie you can pay whatever percentage you want
come and join us now, spread the hash!
come and join us now, spread the hash!
I reduced fee back to 0.75% on http://hashinvest.net
Dev fee is taken properly, no additional main mining degradation is involved. Miner shows raw hash rate, but except dev fee there are also "outdated share found - skip" messages:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
Right, it display the raw hashrate. Thanks for the input.
Test v3.1, I improved pool-related code, v2.2 has problems with json implementation if pool is loaded heavily, it can skip new jobs in some cases and it will cause a lot of outdated shares.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
PM'ed.
http://moneropool.com/ die again?! 
HERE ARE THE RESULTS after 18 hours of mining.
I stop the mining 5 hours ago, to let the blocs on pool to be mature and payouts done. If in the next hours there is more payouts, i will correct.
CPU 1 (xeon 2687W) on minergate (330H/s, merge mining) : 0.533054140795 XMR
CPU 2 (xeon 2687W, Wolf cpuminer) on crypto-pool.fr (~340 to 360H/s) : 0.603162341904 XMR
GPU (R9 280X, Claymore 2.2) on Crypto-pool.fr (325H/s) : 0.438738015254 XMR
Conclusion :
Fisrt, Minergate miner is not as good as Wolf's one, but do merge mining
CPU2 is a little better than the GPU in hashrate (up to 10%), but the difference in earnings is almost 25% (including 5% of fee)
I don't know if there is some sort of hidden fees or simply a performance issue due to the way the devfee is taken.
I stop the mining 5 hours ago, to let the blocs on pool to be mature and payouts done. If in the next hours there is more payouts, i will correct.
CPU 1 (xeon 2687W) on minergate (330H/s, merge mining) : 0.533054140795 XMR
CPU 2 (xeon 2687W, Wolf cpuminer) on crypto-pool.fr (~340 to 360H/s) : 0.603162341904 XMR
GPU (R9 280X, Claymore 2.2) on Crypto-pool.fr (325H/s) : 0.438738015254 XMR
Conclusion :
Fisrt, Minergate miner is not as good as Wolf's one, but do merge mining
CPU2 is a little better than the GPU in hashrate (up to 10%), but the difference in earnings is almost 25% (including 5% of fee)
I don't know if there is some sort of hidden fees or simply a performance issue due to the way the devfee is taken.
I have 4.5 KH/s from my GPUs. After 60 hours mining at moneropool.com I've observed ~30% less of expected income (all fees included).
Hey everyone! I have another question about Claymores GPU miner.
I am using a 270x and its pumping out ~350 h/s and I just got a 280x now using the same code it's pumping out around ~360 h/s. I am using the setx GPU_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 and have catalyst 13.12 installed. I have tried version 3.0 and 3.1 of claymores gpu miner and I am no where near the 450 h/s the readme claims. Anyone rocking a 280x? I may try new catalyst version next.
Thanks for the help
I am using a 270x and its pumping out ~350 h/s and I just got a 280x now using the same code it's pumping out around ~360 h/s. I am using the setx GPU_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 and have catalyst 13.12 installed. I have tried version 3.0 and 3.1 of claymores gpu miner and I am no where near the 450 h/s the readme claims. Anyone rocking a 280x? I may try new catalyst version next.
Thanks for the help
Dev fee is taken properly, no additional main mining degradation is involved. Miner shows raw hash rate, but except dev fee there are also "outdated share found - skip" messages:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
Test v3.1, I improved pool-related code, v2.2 has problems with json implementation if pool is loaded heavily, it can skip new jobs in some cases and it will cause a lot of outdated shares.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
Thanks for the infos.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
Test v3.1, I improved pool-related code, v2.2 has problems with json implementation if pool is loaded heavily, it can skip new jobs in some cases and it will cause a lot of outdated shares.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
I'm testing 3.1 right now, nice improvement.
Waiting for a version that can mine to minergate with merge mining
Dev fee is taken properly, no additional main mining degradation is involved. Miner shows raw hash rate, but except dev fee there are also "outdated share found - skip" messages:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
Test v3.1, I improved pool-related code, v2.2 has problems with json implementation if pool is loaded heavily, it can skip new jobs in some cases and it will cause a lot of outdated shares.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7212994
Test v3.1, I improved pool-related code, v2.2 has problems with json implementation if pool is loaded heavily, it can skip new jobs in some cases and it will cause a lot of outdated shares.
BTW, I see strange things related to pools in logs and you can check them too. There are two threads in miner - main and devfee, both are connected to the same pool and both must get new job at the same time. However, sometimes new job arrives only to one thread and second thread can get it 10-30 seconds later or don't get it at all. I test stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666, I did not test other pools.
HERE ARE THE RESULTS after 18 hours of mining.
I stop the mining 5 hours ago, to let the blocs on pool to be mature and payouts done. If in the next hours there is more payouts, i will correct.
CPU 1 (xeon 2687W) on minergate (330H/s, merge mining) : 0.533054140795 XMR
CPU 2 (xeon 2687W, Wolf cpuminer) on crypto-pool.fr (~340 to 360H/s) : 0.603162341904 XMR
GPU (R9 280X, Claymore 2.2) on Crypto-pool.fr (325H/s) : 0.438738015254 XMR
Conclusion :
Fisrt, Minergate miner is not as good as Wolf's one, but do merge mining
CPU2 is a little better than the GPU in hashrate (up to 10%), but the difference in earnings is almost 25% (including 5% of fee)
I don't know if there is some sort of hidden fees or simply a performance issue due to the way the devfee is taken.
I stop the mining 5 hours ago, to let the blocs on pool to be mature and payouts done. If in the next hours there is more payouts, i will correct.
CPU 1 (xeon 2687W) on minergate (330H/s, merge mining) : 0.533054140795 XMR
CPU 2 (xeon 2687W, Wolf cpuminer) on crypto-pool.fr (~340 to 360H/s) : 0.603162341904 XMR
GPU (R9 280X, Claymore 2.2) on Crypto-pool.fr (325H/s) : 0.438738015254 XMR
Conclusion :
Fisrt, Minergate miner is not as good as Wolf's one, but do merge mining
CPU2 is a little better than the GPU in hashrate (up to 10%), but the difference in earnings is almost 25% (including 5% of fee)
I don't know if there is some sort of hidden fees or simply a performance issue due to the way the devfee is taken.
Thanks for posting results. I think that the hashrate displayed on the GPU miner is calculated differently, thus exaggerated.
Jump to: